alphaFeedback

WorksMathematics

Global regularity of the two-dimensional fractional Boussinesq equations with critical dissipation

AI contributions
Not recorded for this paper
View details

Abstract

In the present paper, our primary focus is on the Boussinesq equations with fractional velocity dissipation ΛαuΛ^αu and temperature diffusion ΛβθΛ^βθ. On the critical balance line α+β=1α+β=1, establishing global regularity for weak velocity dissipation has been obstructed by the quadratic convective-buoyancy feedback, and all available results below α=1013α=\frac{10}{13} require a smallness assumption on the initial temperature. In this paper, we prove large-data global regularity across the extended regime α>57−54≈0.637α>\frac{\sqrt{57}-5}{4} \approx 0.637. This provides a step beyond the previous barrier α=1013α=\frac{10}{13}, unconditionally dismantling the temperature smallness assumption that has persisted in the literature for over a decade. The mathematical mechanism relies on a high-order Quadratic Normal Form transformation H=ω-R_αθ-\Bop(θ,θ) tailored to eliminate non-resonant quadratic vorticity-temperature interactions. Crucially, by uncovering the exact physical scalings of the underlying multilinear commutators and maintaining sharp fractional conjugates in the LmL^m-energy framework, we ensure that the global energy closure is governed entirely by the quadratic thermal dissipation. Once an integrability threshold m>2αm>\frac{2}α is attained, a fine Littlewood-Paley transport estimate drives a fractional regularity gain H∈Br,∞3α−2H \in B_{r,\infty}^{3α-2}, ensuring the velocity field achieves critical drift regularity CαC^α. By Silvestre-type drift regularization, this spontaneously generates positive Hölder continuity for the temperature, which in turn elevates the drift regularity strictly beyond the critical threshold, unlocking non-local Schauder estimates to prevent finite-time singularity formation.

AMS Subject Classification 2020: 35Q35; 35B65; 76D03.

Keywords: Boussinesq equations; Global regularity; Fractional dissipation.

[email protected] (Qian Li), [email protected] (Jiahong Wu), [email protected] (Xiaojing Xu), [email protected] (Zhuan Ye)

Introduction

We consider the Cauchy problem for the two-dimensional (2D) incompressible Boussinesq equations with fractional dissipation

\begin{cases} \partial_t u + (u \cdot\nabla)u + \Lambda^{\alpha}u + \nabla p = \theta e_2,\\ \partial_t \theta+ (u \cdot\nabla)\theta+ \Lambda^{\beta}\theta= 0,\\ \nabla\cdot u = 0,\\ u(x,0) = u_0(x),\quad\theta(x,0) = \theta_0(x), \end{cases} \qquad x \in\mathbb{R}^{2},\quad t>0. \tag*{(1)}\end{cases}

where u=(u1,u2)u=(u_1,u_2) denotes the velocity field, pp is the scalar pressure, θ\theta represents the temperature (or buoyancy), and e2=(0,1)e_2=(0,1) is the vertical unit vector. The fractional dissipation operator Λ=(−Δ)12\Lambda=(-\Delta)^{\frac{1}{2}} is defined via the Fourier transform Λγf^(ξ)=∣ξ∣γf^(ξ)\widehat{\Lambda^\gamma f}(\xi)=|\xi|^\gamma\hat{f}(\xi), with α\alpha and β\beta characterizing the intensity of the non-local dissipation in the fluid and the thermal diffusion, respectively.

The Boussinesq system (1.1) plays a fundamental role in geophysical fluid dynamics, modeling atmospheric and oceanic flows driven by density differences [27, 29]. Mathematically, it also serves as a critical lower-dimensional toy model for the 3D incompressible Euler and Navier-Stokes equations, owing to the structural similarities in their vortex stretching mechanisms. Beyond the classical viscous and thermal diffusion models (α=β=2\alpha=\beta=2), the incorporation of fractional dissipation operators carries profound physical significance in modern fluid dynamics. In large-scale geophysical scenarios, oceanic and atmospheric flows are inherently turbulent, rendering standard Brownian molecular diffusion inadequate to capture the complex, multi-scale mixing processes. Instead, the fractional Laplacian serves as a rigorous macroscopic parameterization for anomalous diffusion driven by Lévy flights of fluid parcels in fully developed turbulence [30]. Furthermore, specific fractional orders directly correspond to observable geophysical boundary effects; for instance, the case α=1\alpha=1 mathematically encapsulates the Ekman pumping friction originating from the bottom boundary layers of rotating fluids [10, 29]. Therefore, identifying the exact analytical threshold for global regularity in the fractional regime not only resolves a longstanding mathematical challenge but also helps determine the minimum intensity of turbulent mixing required to prevent catastrophic atmospheric frontogenesis or finite-time singularity formation [10].

The principal mathematical challenge in establishing global regularity for (1.1) lies in the derivative forcing present in the vorticity equation. Denoting the scalar vorticity by ω=∂1u2−∂2u1\omega=\partial_1u_2-\partial_2u_1, applying the curl operator to (1.1) yields:

∂tω+(u⋅∇)ω+Λαω=∂1θ.(2)\partial_t\omega+(u\cdot\nabla)\omega+\Lambda^{\alpha}\omega=\partial_1\theta. \tag*{(2)}

While the temperature equation obeys a robust maximum principle (∥θ(t)∥∞≤∥θ0∥∞\|\theta(t)\|_{\infty}\leq\|\theta_0\|_{\infty}), it provides no immediate bound for the derivative term ∂1θ\partial_1\theta on the right-hand side of (1.2). This mismatch induces a severe “loss of derivatives.” Overcoming this loss heavily depends on the subtle interplay between the fractional dissipation regimes α\alpha and β\beta. The regime where α+β=1\alpha+\beta=1 is universally recognized as the critical line, whereas α+β>1\alpha+\beta>1 and α+β<1\alpha+\beta<1 are referred to as the subcritical and supercritical regimes, respectively.

Historical context

Due to its profound physical relevance and structural analogy to the 3D Euler equations—where the temperature gradient ∇⊥θ\nabla^\perp\theta acts as a potent driving mechanism analogous to vortex stretching—the 2D Boussinesq system has inspired an extensive body of mathematical and computational literature [2, 16, 26]. The fundamental local well-posedness and blow-up criteria for the Boussinesq equations were pioneered by Chae and Nam [5]. Conversely, the quest for finite-time singularity formation in the purely inviscid equations has witnessed spectacular breakthroughs recently. Triggered by the striking numerical discovery of Luo and Hou [25], Elgindi and Jeong rigorously demonstrated finite-time singularity formation for strong solutions to the Boussinesq system [15]. Subsequently, Chen and Hou [7] provided a monumental proof of stable, finite-time blow-up for the 2D inviscid Boussinesq equations with smooth data in the presence of a boundary. These groundbreaking results, alongside Elgindi’s finite-time singularity formation for the 3D Euler equations with C1,αC^{1,\alpha} data [14], profoundly underscore the virulent nature of the quadratic buoyancy forcing. In light of these finite-time singularity formations in the absence of dissipation, establishing global regularity necessitates an exquisite balance of partial or fractional dissipation. For global regularity, early breakthroughs were achieved in the partial dissipation regimes. Hou and Li [22], and independently Chae [4], established global well-posedness for the viscous but nondiffusive case (α=2,β=0\alpha= 2, \beta= 0). The inviscid but strictly diffusive case (α=0,β=2\alpha= 0, \beta= 2) was subsequently resolved by Chae [4] and further refined by Danchin and Paicu [13], and Hmidi and Keraani [18]. Concurrently, remarkable progress was made regarding anisotropic partial dissipation; for instance, Cao and Wu [3], as well as Larios, Lunasin, and Titi [24], established global regularity for systems lacking dissipation in certain spatial directions. Hmidi and Zerguine [21] further considered Euler–Boussinesq systems with fractional thermal diffusion. These works systematically demonstrate how dissipation in one equation can control the coupled system through sophisticated transport estimates and vorticity bounds.

An essential step toward weaker dissipation was made by Hmidi, Keraani, and Rousset. They proved global well-posedness for the Boussinesq–Navier–Stokes system with only first-order velocity dissipation [19] and for the Euler–Boussinesq system with only first-order thermal diffusion [20]. In these two models, the other dissipative term is absent. Their approach uses a combined quantity involving the vorticity and a Riesz transform of the temperature, replacing the derivative forcing by a commutator that can be estimated in suitable function spaces. This change of unknowns is a basic component of many subsequent arguments for fractional Boussinesq equations. Based on regularity estimates for the associated drift–diffusion equation, Ye [39] (see also [40]) gave an alternative proof for the Euler–Boussinesq system with critical thermal diffusion without the use of the combined quantity introduced in [20].

The global well-posedness in the subcritical regime has also attracted extensive attention and has been investigated in depth in recent years. It is worth emphasizing that the global regularity of (1) in the subcritical ranges is not a trivial problem. In fact, many subcritical cases have not been resolved. In particular, we do not know the global regularity for the case when α\alpha and β\beta are close to one half and α+β>1\alpha+ \beta> 1. In the regimes with stronger velocity dissipation, Miao and Xue [28] obtained global well-posedness for a class of such systems, namely, α>6−64\alpha> \frac{6-\sqrt{6}}{4}. Ye [38] enlarged the range of velocity dissipation to α>10−2105\alpha> \frac{10-2\sqrt{10}}{5}. Zhou, Li, Shang, Wu, Yuan, and Zhao [42] proved global well-posedness for 23<α<1\frac{2}{3} < \alpha< 1 and β>1−αα\beta> \frac{1-\alpha}{\alpha}. These results illustrate that the inequality α+β>1\alpha+ \beta> 1 alone does not capture all the conditions needed by a given proof. Recently, Stefanov, Wu, Xu, and Ye [34], Theorem 1.1 made interesting progress in the subcritical regime, establishing global well-posedness for by pushing the threshold down to α>23\alpha> \frac{2}{3}. In regimes with stronger thermal diffusion, Constantin and Vicol [11 Theorem 6.1] proved global well-posedness for smooth solutions of the fractional Boussinesq system with 0<α,β<10 < \alpha,\beta< 1 under the condition β>22+α\beta> \frac{2}{2+\alpha}, which was further improved by Ye and Xu [41]. The very recent preprint of Stefanov, Wu, Xu, and Ye [35] addresses subcritical dissipation for α≤23\alpha\le\frac{2}{3}, and their result holds under the condition

{β≥4−2α4+α,0<α≤13−3,β>max⁡{4−6αα,2−α−2α22α},13−3<α≤23.\begin{cases} \beta\ge\frac{4-2\alpha}{4+\alpha}, & 0 < \alpha\le\sqrt{13}-3,\\ \beta> \max\left\{\frac{4-6\alpha}{\alpha},\frac{2-\alpha-2\alpha^2}{2\alpha}\right\}, & \sqrt{13}-3 < \alpha\le\frac{2}{3}. \end{cases}

Compared with [19, 20], when both dissipative terms are present and 0<α,β<10 < \alpha,\beta< 1, the general critical line α+β=1\alpha+\beta=1 requires a more delicate balance. Jiu, Miao, Wu, and Zhang [23] established global regularity for

α>23−14512=0.9132….\alpha> \frac{23-\sqrt{145}}{12}=0.9132\ldots.

Stefanov and Wu [33] obtained the threshold

α>1777−2324=0.7981…,\alpha> \frac{\sqrt{1777}-23}{24}=0.7981\ldots,

and Wu, Xu, Xue, and Ye [36] proved global regularity for α>1013\alpha> \frac{10}{13}. The proofs combine estimates for the corrected vorticity with regularity mechanisms for a critical active scalar. On the critical line α+β=1\alpha+\beta=1, Stefanov, Wu, Xu, and Ye [34 Theorem 1.2] recently managed to lower the regularity threshold to α>23\alpha> \frac{2}{3}. However, to control the explosive growth of the nonlinear commutators in this low-dissipation regime, a strict smallness condition on the initial temperature amplitude (∥θ0∥L∞≪1\lVert\theta_0\rVert_{L^\infty}\ll1) was inevitably required. This smallness assumption has remained a major bottleneck in the literature, as the velocity dissipation alone proves fundamentally insufficient to close the energy estimates when α\alpha drops below 1013\frac{10}{13}.

1.2. Main contributions and methodological innovations. In this paper, we completely remove the aforementioned smallness assumption and establish unconditional global well-posedness for arbitrary, large initial data on the critical line, pushing the regularity threshold further down to an algebraic root α0=57−54≈0.637\alpha_0=\frac{\sqrt{57}-5}{4}\approx0.637 (the positive root of 2α2+5α−4=02\alpha^2+5\alpha-4=0). The present paper treats the critical interval α0<α≤1013\alpha_0<\alpha\le\frac{10}{13} with arbitrary HsH^s data. The main results are stated as follows.

Theorem 1.1. Let (u0,θ0)∈Hs(R2)×Hs(R2)(u_0,\theta_0)\in H^s(\mathbb{R}^2)\times H^s(\mathbb{R}^2) with s>2s>2 and ∇⋅u0=0\nabla\cdot u_0=0. If α+β=1\alpha+\beta=1 and α>57−54\alpha>\frac{\sqrt{57}-5}{4}, then there exists a unique global solution to the system (1.1) such that for any given T>0T>0

u∈C([0,T];Hs(R2))∩L2([0,T];Hs+α2(R2)),u\in C([0,T];H^s(\mathbb{R}^2))\cap L^2([0,T];H^{s+\frac{\alpha}{2}}(\mathbb{R}^2)),
θ∈C([0,T];Hs(R2))∩L2([0,T];Hs+β2(R2)).\theta\in C([0,T];H^s(\mathbb{R}^2))\cap L^2([0,T];H^{s+\frac{\beta}{2}}(\mathbb{R}^2)).

To breach the barrier of the smallness assumption and transcend the α=1013\alpha=\frac{10}{13} threshold, this paper introduces a highly refined Quadratic Normal Form (QNF) method coupled with exact scaling analysis. Our strategy unfolds in the following novel steps:

  1. Bilinear normal form and frequency splitting: The standard linear correction G=ω−RαθG = \omega- R_{\alpha}\theta leaves behind a virulent purely quadratic temperature term C2(θ,θ)C_2(\theta,\theta). We introduce a bilinear Fourier multiplier B(θ,θ)\mathcal{B}(\theta,\theta) designed to algebraically cancel the non-resonant portion of C2C_2. A sophisticated high-output cutoff χout\chi_{\mathrm{out}} is deployed to isolate the interactions into strictly separated non-resonant, resonant, and low-output regimes.

  1. Eradicating the smallness assumption via exact exponent tracking: In the LmL^m energy estimates of the corrected vorticity H=ω−Rαθ−B(θ,θ)H = \omega- R_{\alpha}\theta- \mathcal{B}(\theta,\theta), past works relied on loose Hölder interpolations, yielding a severe time-integrability failure unless ∥θ∥L∞\lVert\theta\rVert_{L^\infty} was artificially small. By introducing a highly precise fractional chain rule and rigorously avoiding any over-estimation in the conjugate exponents (see Proposition 5.2), we ensure that the nonlinear growth is universally bounded by the natural temperature dissipation energy ∫0T∥Λβ2θ∥22 dt<∞\int_0^T \lVert\Lambda^{\frac{\beta}{2}}\theta\rVert_2^2\,dt < \infty.

  1. Positive Hölder gain via commutator cancellation: We demonstrate that as long as the Lebesgue exponent satisfies m>2αm > \frac{2}{\alpha}, the fractional dissipation ΛαH\Lambda^\alpha H strictly overtakes the transport commutators. This directly bootstraps the corrected vorticity to a Besov regularity gain H∈Br,∞3α−2H \in B^{3\alpha-2}_{r,\infty}, which in turn guarantees the velocity field u∈C1−βu \in C^{1-\beta}.

  1. The Silvestre-Schauder bootstrap: The regularity u∈C1−βu \in C^{1-\beta} perfectly aligns with the critical-drift threshold of Silvestre’s theorem [31] for advection fractional-diffusion equations. This triggers a spontaneous generation of Hölder regularity for the temperature field, immediately elevating the velocity drift regularity strictly beyond the critical threshold.

More detailed innovations can be summarized as follows:

Innovation 1: Tripartite phase-space decomposition and resonant geometry. Dividing by D(k,l)D(k,l) inevitably encounters small-divisor singularities near the resonant variety D(k,l)=0D(k,l) = 0. We overcome this by constructing a smooth partition of unity in phase space:

References

  1. [1]H. Bahouri, J.-Y. Chemin, R. Danchin, Fourier Analysis and Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations, Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften, vol. 343, Springer, Heidelberg, 2011.DOI
  2. [2]J. R. Cannon, E. DiBenedetto, The initial value problem for the Boussinesq equations with data in Lᵖ, Lecture Notes in Math., vol. 771, Springer, Berlin, 1980, pp. 129–144.DOI
  3. [3]C. Cao, J. Wu, Global regularity for the 2D anisotropic Boussinesq equations with vertical dissipation, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 208 (2013), no. 3, 985–1004.
  4. [4]D. Chae, Global regularity for the 2D Boussinesq equations with partial viscosity terms, Adv. Math. 203 (2006), no. 2, 497–513.DOI
  5. [5]D. Chae, H. Nam, Local existence and blow-up criterion for the Boussinesq equations, Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh Sect. A 127 (1997), no. 5, 935–946.DOI
  6. [6]P. Chaudru de Raynal, S. Menozzi, E. Priola, Schauder estimates for drifted fractional operators in the supercritical case, J. Funct. Anal. 278 (2020), no. 8, 108425.arxiv.org/abs/1902.02616
  7. [7]J. Chen, T. Y. Hou, Stable nearly self-similar blowup of the 2D Boussinesq and 3D Euler equations with smooth data, Ann. of Math. (2) 199 (2024), no. 1, 213–419.
  8. [8]F. Christ, M. Weinstein, Dispersion of small amplitude solutions of the generalized Korteweg-de Vries equation, J. Funct. Anal. 100 (1991), no. 1, 87–109.DOI
  9. [9]R. Coifman, Y. Meyer, Au-delà des opérateurs pseudo-différentiels, Astérisque, no. 57, Société Mathématique de France, Paris, 1978.
  10. [10]P. Constantin, A. Majda, E. Tabak, Formation of strong fronts in the 2-D quasigeostrophic thermal active scalar, Nonlinearity 7 (1994) 1495–1533.DOI
  11. [11]P. Constantin, V. Vicol, Nonlinear maximum principles for dissipative linear nonlocal operators and applications, Geom. Funct. Anal. 22 (2012), no. 5, 1289–1321.arxiv.org/abs/1110.0179
  12. [12]A. Córdoba, D. Córdoba, A maximum principle applied to quasi-geostrophic equations, Comm. Math. Phys. 249 (2004), no. 3, 511–528.DOI
  13. [13]R. Danchin, M. Paicu, Global well-posedness issues for the inviscid Boussinesq system with Yudovich’s type data, Comm. Math. Phys. 290 (2009), no. 1, 1–14.DOI
  14. [14]T. Elgindi, Finite-time singularity formation for C¹,α solutions to the incompressible Euler equations on R³, Ann. of Math. (2) 194 (2021), no. 3, 647–727.
  15. [15]T. Elgindi, I. Jeong, Finite-time singularity formation for strong solutions to the Boussinesq system, Ann. PDE 6 (2020), no. 1, Paper No. 5, 50 pp.arxiv.org/abs/1708.02724
  16. [16]W. E, C. S. Shu, Small-scale structures in Boussinesq convection, Phys. Fluids 6 (1994), no. 1, 49–58.DOI
  17. [17]K. Fujiwara, Remark on the chain rule of fractional derivative in the Sobolev framework, Math. Inequal. Appl. 24 (2021), 1113–1124.arxiv.org/abs/2104.05092
  18. [18]T. Hmidi, S. Keraani, On the global well-posedness of the Boussinesq system with zero viscosity, Indiana Univ. Math. J. 58 (2009), no. 4, 1591–1618.
  19. [19]T. Hmidi, S. Keraani, and F. Rousset, Global well-posedness for a Boussinesq–Navier–Stokes system with critical dissipation, J. Differential Equations 249 (2010), no. 9, 2147–2174.
  20. [20]T. Hmidi, S. Keraani, F. Rousset, Global well-posedness for Euler–Boussinesq system with critical dissipation, Comm. Partial Differential Equations 36 (2011), no. 3, 420–445.DOI
  21. [21]T. Hmidi, M. Zerguine, On the global well-posedness of the Euler–Boussinesq system with fractional dissipation, Phys. D 239 (2010), 1387–1401.
  22. [22]T. Hou, C. Li, Global well-posedness of the viscous Boussinesq equations, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. 12 (2005), no. 1, 1–12.DOI
  23. [23]Q. Jiu, C. Miao, J. Wu, Z. Zhang, The 2D incompressible Boussinesq equations with general critical dissipation, SIAM J. Math. Anal. 46 (2014), no. 5, 3426–3454.
  24. [24]A. Larios, E. Lunasin, E. S. Titi, Global well-posedness for the 2D Boussinesq system with anisotropic viscosity and without heat diffusion, J. Differential Equations 255 (2013), no. 9, 2636–2654.DOI
  25. [25]G. Luo, T. Hou, Toward the finite-time blowup of the 3D axisymmetric Euler equations: a numerical investigation, Multiscale Model. Simul. 12 (2014), no. 4, 1722–1776.
  26. [26]A. J. Majda, Introduction to PDEs and Waves for the Atmosphere and Ocean, Courant Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 9, AMS, Providence, RI, 2003.DOI
  27. [27]A. J. Majda, A. L. Bertozzi, Vorticity and Incompressible Flow, Cambridge Texts in Applied Mathematics, vol. 27, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2002.DOI
  28. [28]C. Miao, L. Xue, On the global well-posedness of a class of Boussinesq–Navier–Stokes systems, NoDEA Nonlinear Differential Equations Appl. 18 (2011), 707–735.DOI
  29. [29]J. Pedlosky, Geophysical Fluid Dynamics, 2nd ed., Springer, New York, 1987.
  30. [30]M. Shlesinger, G. Zaslavsky, J. Klafter, Strange kinetics, Nature, 363(6424), (1993), 31–37.DOI
  31. [31]L. Silvestre, Hölder estimates for advection fractional-diffusion equations, Ann. Sc. Norm. Super. Pisa Cl. Sci. (5) 11 (2012), no. 4, 843–855.DOI
  32. [32]L. Silvestre, On the differentiability of the solution to an equation with drift and fractional diffusion, Indiana Univ. Math. J. 61 (2012), 557–584.arxiv.org/abs/1012.2401
  33. [33]A. Stefanov, J. Wu, A global regularity result for the 2D Boussinesq equations with critical dissipation, J. Anal. Math. 137 (2019), 269–290.arxiv.org/abs/1411.1362
  34. [34]A. Stefanov, J. Wu, X. Xu, Z. Ye, A global regularity results of the 2D fractional Boussinesq equations, Math. Ann. 391 (2025), 5965–6012.DOI
  35. [35]A. Stefanov, J. Wu, X. Xu, Z. Ye, Global regularity of the 2D fractional Boussinesq equations with subcritical dissipation, preprint, arXiv:2606.03680, 2026.arxiv.org/abs/2606.03680
  36. [36]J. Wu, X. Xu, L. Xue, Z. Ye, Regularity results for the 2D Boussinesq equations with critical or supercritical dissipation, Commun. Math. Sci. 14 (2016), no. 7, 1963–1997.DOI
  37. [37]L. Xue, Z. Ye, On the differentiability issue of the drift-diffusion equation with nonlocal Lévy-type diffusion, Pacific J. Math. 293 (2018), 471–510.DOI
  38. [38]Z. Ye, Global smooth solution to the 2D Boussinesq equations with fractional dissipation, Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 40 (2017), no. 12, 4595–4612.arxiv.org/abs/1510.03237
  39. [39]Z. Ye, An alternative approach to global regularity for the 2D Euler–Boussinesq equations with critical dissipation, Nonlinear Anal. 190 (2020), 111591.DOI
  40. [40]Z. Ye, Global well-posedness for the 2D Euler–Boussinesq–Bénard equations with critical dissipation, J. Differential Equations 392 (2024), 209–254.DOI
  41. [41]Z. Ye, X. Xu, Global well-posedness of the 2D Boussinesq equations with fractional Laplacian dissipation, J. Differential Equations 260 (2016), no. 8, 6716–6744.DOI
  42. [42]D. Zhou, Z. Li, H. Shang, J. Wu, B. Yuan, J. Zhao, Global well-posedness for the 2D fractional Boussinesq equations in the subcritical case, Pacific J. Math. 298 (2019), no. 1, 233–255.DOI

Paper details

vlnc:W_zenqtvgt
v1 · latestHistory (1)

published · Fresh — added to the Hub within the last 30 days

added ·

Usage

views · 0

downloads · 0

A view counts once per browser per day, a download each time the PDF is requested.

CC BY 4.0

Original source

  • Mathematics

Not recorded for this paper · View statement →

Looking for related papers…
Contents