Introduction

For a proper integral variety SS over a field kk, the Stein degree over kk is

sdeg⁡(S/Spec⁡k)=dim⁡kH0(S,OS).\operatorname{sdeg}(S/\operatorname{Spec} k) = \dim_k H^0(S, \mathcal{O}_S).

The field of global functions measures the finite part of the structural morphism. Its degree can be large even when the dimension of SS is fixed. The question here is whether a boundary component of a log Calabi–Yau pair has uniformly bounded Stein degree once its coefficient is bounded away from zero.

Birkar formulates this question for log Calabi–Yau fibrations in [4], Conjecture 11.1. Birkar–Qu prove normalized Stein-degree bounds over algebraically closed characteristic-zero fields [6], Theorem 1.3, as summarized in [4], Theorem 12.1. Over an arbitrary characteristic-zero field, the finite arithmetic extensions carried by boundary components must also be controlled.

For any integral kk-variety VV, let kVk_V be the relative algebraic closure of kk in its function field and put

c(V/k)=[kV:k].(1)c(V/k) = [k_V : k]. \tag*{(1)}

Our result bounds this stronger invariant.

Theorem 1.1. For every integer d≥1d \ge1 and real number t>0t > 0, there is an integer N(d,t)≥1N(d,t) \ge1 with the following property. Let kk be any field of characteristic zero, and let (X,B)(X, B) be a projective log canonical Q\mathbb{Q}-pair such that

dim⁡X=d,H0(X,OX)=k,KX+B∼Q0.\dim X = d,\qquad H^0(X,\mathcal{O}_X) = k,\qquad K_X + B \sim_{\mathbb{Q}} 0.

Assume that XX is normal and integral and that BB is effective. If SS is a prime component of BB with coefficient at least tt, then

c(S/k)≤N(d,t).c(S/k) \le N(d,t).

Consequently

sdeg⁡(S/Spec⁡k)≤dim⁡kH0(Sν,OSν)=c(S/k)≤N(d,t),\operatorname{sdeg}(S/\operatorname{Spec} k) \le\dim_k H^0(S^\nu,\mathcal{O}_{S^\nu}) = c(S/k) \le N(d,t),

where SνS^\nu is the normalization of SS. Theorem 1.1 thus proves the contraction-to-Spec kk formulation of Birkar’s Stein-degree conjecture for ordinary Q\mathbb{Q}-pairs.

The birational strategy follows Birkar–Qu [6], using the minimal model program (MMP), bounded complements, and boundedness of Fano varieties. Two additional arguments address the arithmetic and inductive difficulties. First, Section 3 turns geometric boundedness into a bound on Galois orbits of divisorial valuations. A bounded extension fixes a polarization class; a determinant construction descends a bounded power of that class. On a resolution of the resulting bounded pair, a log canonical place is determined by a stratum and integral weights. The finite permutation action on strata therefore bounds its arithmetic orbit, even though there may be infinitely many such places. Second, when the distinguished divisor becomes vertical on a Mori fibre space, the earlier bigness of that divisor forces a horizontal boundary component of coefficient one. A relative MMP makes the two components intersect, so ordinary divisorial adjunction reduces the dimension (Sections 4 and 5).

Conventions and foundational inputs

All fields have characteristic zero. A variety is integral and of finite type over its ground field. A contraction is a projective surjective morphism f ⁣:V→Zf \colon V \to Z between normal varieties with f∗OV=OZf_* \mathcal{O}_V = \mathcal{O}_Z. Divisors over a variety are identified with divisorial valuations, normalized to have value group Z\mathbb{Z}. We use log discrepancies:

a(P,X,B)=1−coeff⁡PBW,KW+BW=p∗(KX+B).a(P,X,B)=1-\operatorname{coeff}_{P}B_W,\qquad K_W+B_W=p^*(K_X+B).

The pair is log canonical (lc) if these numbers are nonnegative and Kawamata log terminal (klt) if they are positive. A divisorial valuation of log discrepancy zero is an lclc place. A variety is ϵ\epsilon-lc if the pair with zero boundary has all log discrepancies at least ϵ\epsilon. Canonical divisors in birational comparisons are chosen compatibly. The relation ∼Q0\sim_{\mathbb{Q}} 0 means that a positive integral multiple is a principal Cartier divisor.

We require Q\mathbb{Q}-factoriality only over the working field. It need not hold over an algebraic closure. For normal geometrically integral varieties, the singularity conditions just stated are preserved by ground-field extension: resolve in characteristic zero, base change, and apply the log smooth discrepancy criterion. Coefficients on geometric components are unchanged.

Constants and generic fibres

Lemma 2.1. Let VV be an integral kk-variety.

(i) The number c(V/k)c(V/k) is the number of irreducible components of Vk‾V_{\overline{k}}; these components form one Galois orbit. It is a birational invariant. If VV is proper, then H0(V,OV)⊆kVH^0(V,\mathcal{O}_V) \subseteq k_V, with equality when VV is normal.

(ii) If V→ZV \to Z is dominant and ZZ is geometrically integral over kk, then, for its generic fibre,

c(V/k)≤c(VηZ/k(Z)).(2)c(V/k) \leq c(V_{\eta_Z}/k(Z)). \tag*{(2)}

(iii) If XX is normal projective and H0(X,OX)=kH^0(X,\mathcal{O}_X)=k, then XX is geometrically integral. The normal base of a contraction from XX is also geometrically integral. Its generic fibre is normal, projective, and has global functions k(Z)k(Z).

Proof. The extension kV/kk_V/k is finite and separable, and k(V)/kVk(V)/k_V is regular. Its embeddings in k‾\overline{k} give precisely the geometric components. Properness makes global functions finite over kk. On a normal variety every element of k(V)k(V) algebraic over kk is integral over every local ring and hence regular, proving (i). The regular extension k(Z)/kk(Z)/k is linearly disjoint from kV/kk_V/k. Thus kVk(Z)k_Vk(Z) is a degree-[kV:k][k_V:k] extension of k(Z)k(Z) inside k(V)k(V) and is contained in the relative algebraic closure of k(Z)k(Z) there. This proves (ii). The first assertion of (iii) follows from (i). For a contraction, global functions on the base are kk and localizing f∗OX=OZf_*\mathcal{O}_X=\mathcal{O}_Z gives the asserted generic-fibre function field. Normality is preserved by localization, and a normal variety over a perfect field is geometrically normal; the assertion follows over k(Z)k(Z) as well.

We use c(P/k)c(P/k) for a divisorial valuation by using its residue function field. Its geometric extensions on a model where it is a divisor are distinct valuations forming a single Galois orbit.

If (X,B)(X,B) is as in Theorem 1.1 and X→ZX\to Z is a contraction, restriction to the generic fibre gives a projective lc log Calabi–Yau pair over k(Z)k(Z). Indeed, work over the smooth locus of ZZ, restrict a log resolution, and use generic smoothness and adjunction. The same argument restricts a specified principal multiple of KX+BK_X+B. Hence a horizontal boundary component can be treated by induction in the dimension of this generic fibre, using (2.1).

Established theorems used in the proof

We state the versions needed, so that no arithmetic strengthening of a geometric boundedness theorem is implicit.

  • Klt MMP and extraction. For a projective morphism of normal varieties over a characteristic-zero field and a Q\mathbb{Q}-factorial klt pair (V,Δ)(V,\Delta) with effective rational boundary, an MMP with suitable ample scaling terminates in a Mori fibre space if KV+ΔK_V+\Delta is not relatively pseudo-effective. If Δ\Delta is relatively big and KV+ΔK_V+\Delta is relatively pseudo-effective, it terminates in a minimal model. Outputs are Q\mathbb{Q}-factorial and klt. A finite set of exceptional valuations of log discrepancy at most one for a klt Q\mathbb{Q}-pair can be extracted by a projective birational morphism with Q\mathbb{Q}-factorial source and no other exceptional prime divisors. These are consequences of [5]; versions over the fields used here are [10], Theorem 21.7, Corollaries 21.9–21.10, Theorem 22.1. We also use the negativity lemma, monotonicity of discrepancies along a klt MMP, and klt base point freeness.

  • Bounded complements. In fixed dimension, for an lc pair over an algebraically closed characteristic-zero field, with coefficients in a fixed finite rational set, underlying variety of Fano type, and nef anti-log canonical divisor, there is an enlarged lc boundary B+≥BB^+\ge B such that n(K+B+)∼0n(K+B^+)\sim0, where nn depends only on the dimension and coefficient set. This is the relevant case of [2], Theorem 1.7; a finite rational set is contained in an appropriate hyperstandard set. We may replace nn by a prescribed fixed multiple.

  • BAB. For fixed qq and ϵ>0\epsilon>0, geometrically ϵ\epsilon-lc projective Fano varieties of dimension qq over an algebraically closed characteristic-zero field form a bounded family [3], Theorem 1.1. In particular, they admit very ample line bundles of bounded degree.

Here Fano type over ZZ means the existence of an effective rational boundary Δ\Delta with (V,Δ)(V,\Delta) klt and −(KV+Δ)-(K_V+\Delta) ample over ZZ. The absolute term means Z=Spec⁡kZ=\operatorname{Spec} k. The other standard inputs are resolution and principalization in characteristic zero, klt vanishing and rational singularities, and divisorial adjunction; see [1], [9], [8]. We give the index and field arguments for adjunction in Theorem 4.4.

The algebraically closed bounds above are uniform in the ground field. One may also deduce this from their complex versions: descend all finite data, including resolutions and positivity witnesses, to a finitely generated field over Q\mathbb{Q}, embed it into C\mathbb{C}, and spread and specialize an embedding or a complement. For an embedding, very ampleness and its degree persist after shrinking the parameter space. For the complement used below, the general-member argument in Theorem 3.1 gives the same transfer in its specified linear system.

Lemma 2.2. Suppose (V,D)(V,D) is lc and KV+D∼Q0K_V + D \sim_{\mathbb{Q}} 0. Under a birational contraction or flip, push DD forward and keep compatible canonical divisors. Then the resulting pair is crepant to (V,D)(V,D), remains lc with effective boundary, and retains every specified relation n(KV+D)∼0n(K_V + D) \sim0.

Proof. Write the specified multiple as the divisor of a rational function. Since the map extracts no divisors, pushing forward gives the same principal-divisor identity on the new model. Its two pullbacks to a common resolution are that same principal divisor. Thus the pullbacks agree, which proves crepancy and the discrepancy assertions. Without a specified multiple, choose one first. □\square

Arithmetic consequences of geometric boundedness

Descending a complement

Lemma 3.1. Fix dd and a rational number b∈(0,1)b \in(0,1). There is an integer n=n(d,b)n = n(d,b) such that the following holds over every characteristic-zero field kk. Suppose VV is a normal geometrically integral projective klt Fano variety of dimension dd, SS is a Q\mathbb{Q}-Cartier prime divisor, (V,bS)(V,bS) is lc, and −KV−bS-K_V-bS is nef. Then there is an effective rational boundary C≥bSC \ge bS over kk with (V,C)(V,C) lc,

n(KV+C)∼0.n(K_V+C)\sim0.

We may assume nb∈Znb \in\mathbb{Z}.

Proof. Apply bounded complements to (Vk‾,bSk‾)(V_{\overline{k}},bS_{\overline{k}}) and multiply the index by the denominator of bb. The geometric complement has the form bSk‾+D/nbS_{\overline{k}}+D/n, where

D∈∣−nKV−nbS∣k‾.(3)D \in\left|-nK_V-nbS\right|_{\overline{k}}. \tag*{(3)}

This linear system is defined over kk. For clarity, its underlying space is the space of rational sections of the integral Weil divisor −nKV−nbS-nK_V-nbS; it can be computed on the smooth locus and extended across codimension two. Sections commute with field extension. The divisor is Q\mathbb{Q}-Cartier, although it need not be Cartier.

A general geometric member of (3) gives an lc pair. To see this, resolve both (V,bS)(V,bS) and the rational map of this linear system. On a further resolution the pullbacks of its members have the form F+MF+M, with FF fixed and rational and MM varying in a base point free Cartier system. Indeed, differences of pullbacks are divisors of ratios of sections, so eliminating the base ideal gives precisely this decomposition. Arrange that the support of FF and the crepant boundary BWB_W of (V,bS)(V,bS) has simple normal crossings. The existence of one lc member implies that every coefficient of BW+F/nB_W+F/n is at most one: adding the effective moving part could not remove an excessive coefficient. By Bertini, a general MM is smooth and transverse to this support, and its coefficient 1/n1/n is at most one. The resulting log smooth pair is lc.

The argument describes a nonempty geometric open subset of the projective space of sections. Since kk is infinite, its kk-rational points are Zariski dense even after extension to k‾\overline{k}. Choose a member DD over kk in this open subset and set C=bS+D/nC=bS+D/n. Then n(KV+C)=nKV+nbS+Dn(K_V+C)=nK_V+nbS+D is principal over kk, as required. □\square

Log canonical places of a simple normal crossings pair

A stratum of a reduced simple normal crossings divisor will mean an irreducible component of a nonempty intersection of its components, including a single component.

Lemma 3.2. Let WW be smooth over an algebraically closed field, and let HH be a reduced simple normal crossings divisor. If a divisorial valuation vv satisfies a(v,W,H)=0a(v,W,H)=0, then its centre is a stratum. Moreover, vv is uniquely determined by that stratum and its positive integral values on the components of HH containing the stratum. Proof. Let TT be the centre. If fewer than codim⁡T\operatorname{codim} T components of HH pass through its generic point, complete their local equations by a smooth hypersurface containing TT, keeping simple normal crossings. The enlarged reduced divisor is lc, and the additional hypersurface has positive value under vv. The discrepancy for HH would therefore be positive. Thus the components through the generic point of TT have number codim⁡T\operatorname{codim} T, and TT is a stratum.

We prove uniqueness by a sequence of blowups that is determined by the weights. If TT is already a divisor, the normalized valuation centred at its generic point is its order of vanishing. Otherwise choose two components through TT, with values p1,p2>0p_1,p_2 > 0, and blow up their codimension-two intersection near the generic point of TT. The new reduced total divisor is simple normal crossings and the blowup is log crepant. The exceptional divisor has value min⁡(p1,p2)\min(p_1,p_2); the values of the two strict transforms are

p1−min⁡(p1,p2),p2−min⁡(p1,p2),p_1-\min(p_1,p_2), \qquad p_2-\min(p_1,p_2),

with a zero value indicating that the centre is not on that strict transform. The other values are unchanged.

The new centre is again a stratum. These data specify it uniquely over the generic point of TT: in the exceptional P1\mathbb{P}^1-bundle, the two strict transforms give the two distinguished sections. Unequal weights choose one section; equal weights choose the full fibre, since a different proper subvariety would not be a stratum. Intersecting with the remaining components through TT imposes the remaining prescribed conditions. This is also immediate in the two blowup charts. The sum of the positive weights decreases by min⁡(p1,p2)\min(p_1,p_2). Repeating therefore reaches a divisorial centre, where the valuation is unique. Tracing back proves the assertion. □

Corollary 3.3. A klt rational pair has only finitely many divisorial valuations of log discrepancy less than one.

Proof. First work over an algebraic closure and take a log resolution with crepant boundary BWB_W. Let H=∑HiH=\sum H_i be a reduced simple normal crossings divisor containing its support, and write BW=∑biHiB_W=\sum b_iH_i, allowing zero and negative coefficients. Since the pair is klt, bi<1b_i<1. For a valuation vv with discrepancy less than one,

a(v,W,BW)=a(v,W,H)+∑i(1−bi)v(Hi)<1.(3.2)a(v,W,B_W)=a(v,W,H)+\sum_i(1-b_i)v(H_i)<1. \tag*{(3.2)}

The first term on the right is a nonnegative integer, so it is zero. The centre is therefore a stratum by Theorem 3.2. At each stratum, the positive integral weights satisfy ∑i(1−bi)v(Hi)<1\sum_i(1-b_i)v(H_i)<1, which allows only finitely many choices. There are finitely many strata, and Theorem 3.2 gives uniqueness. Over the original field, each divisorial valuation extends to a geometric one with the same discrepancy, so finiteness follows there as well. □

Bounded resolutions and Galois orbits

We record the bounded-family fact needed to keep resolutions over the field of the data.

Lemma 3.4. Fix bounds for the ambient projective dimension, the degree of a normal geometrically integral projective variety VV, and the degree of a reduced divisor D⊂VD\subset V, where DD may be empty. There are constants R,MR,M depending only on these bounds such that, over the field of the embedded pair, one can find a projective resolution p:W→Vp:W\to V and a geometrically simple normal crossings reduced divisor HH containing the exceptional locus and the strict transform of DD, with

b2(Wk‾)≤R,#{geometric components and strata of H}≤M.b_2(W_{\overline{k}})\le R,\qquad\#\{\text{geometric components and strata of }H\}\le M.

One may use an ℓ\ell-adic second Betti number for any ℓ\ell.

Proof. We explain both the finite-type parametrization and the field assertion. A reduced pure-dimensional projective locus of dimension jj and degree at most D0D_0 in a fixed PN\mathbb{P}^N is cut out set-theoretically by equations of bounded degree. Indeed, given a geometric point outside the locus, choose a linear projection to Pj+1\mathbb{P}^{j+1} whose centre misses the locus and whose fibre through that point misses it. Such a choice exists by the usual dimension count. The projection is finite on the locus; its image is a hypersurface of degree at most D0D_0. Pulling back its equation separates the point. Multiplying by forms nonvanishing at that point puts these equations in one fixed degree. The codimension-one case uses the identity projection; the empty and full loci require no argument. A basis of the space of equations in this fixed degree has bounded size. These spaces of equations descend to the field of the locus, because extension of the ground field commutes with their defining linear conditions.

Apply this to VV and DD. Tuples of equations of bounded size and degree give parameter spaces of finite type over Q\mathbb{Q} containing all the embedded pairs over their original fields. Stratify to take fibrewise reductions and to impose geometric normality, integrality, dimension, and the divisor condition. This can be done by spreading the reductions at generic points and shrinking, using characteristic zero and generic flatness, and then proceeding by Noetherian induction.

At the generic point of each stratum, resolve the pair over that point’s own function field. Resolution and principalization in characteristic zero may be chosen to give geometric simple normal crossings, with no extension of that function field [1 Theorems 1.3 and 6.1, including the Addendum]. Spread the projective morphism, the reduced divisor, and a dense open on which the morphism is an isomorphism. After shrinking, the resolving variety is smooth and projective over the stratum, the morphism is fibrewise birational, and the divisor has geometric simple normal crossings in every fibre and contains the required exceptional and marked loci. To verify the last condition, spread the inverse image of the closed bad locus and the smoothness and expected codimensions of intersections of the divisor components; the components can be considered after an auxiliary finite étale cover of the parameter stratum for this verification. The resolution itself remains defined on the original stratum. Noetherian induction on its complement yields finitely many families.

Every embedded pair over a field is a point of one of these strata, so pulling back the corresponding family gives a resolution over that same field. Smooth proper base change bounds the second Betti numbers. Applying it also to intersections of components, after the finite étale covers just used, bounds the numbers of their geometric connected components and hence the numbers of strata. Taking maxima over the finitely many families gives RR and MM. □

Proposition 3.5. Fix an integer q≥1q \ge1, a real ϵ>0\epsilon> 0, and an integer n≥1n \ge1. There is a finite number A(q,ϵ,n)A(q,\epsilon,n) with the following property. Let Q/kQ/k be a normal geometrically integral projective ϵ\epsilon-lc Fano variety of dimension qq, and suppose

(Q,Λ) is lc,Λ≥0,n(KQ+Λ)∼0.(Q,\Lambda)\text{ is lc},\qquad\Lambda\ge0,\qquad n(K_Q+\Lambda)\sim0.

Then every divisorial valuation vv with a(v,Q,Λ)<1a(v,Q,\Lambda)<1 satisfies

c(v/k)≤A(q,ϵ,n).c(v/k)\le A(q,\epsilon,n).

Proof. A bounded polarization after a bounded extension. By BAB, Qk‾Q_{\overline{k}} has a very ample line bundle LL of bounded degree. Its space of sections also has bounded dimension: for a nondegenerate qq-dimensional projective variety, degree is at least codimension plus one, so h0(L)≤Lq+qh^0(L)\le L^q+q.

We claim that Pic⁡(Qk‾)\operatorname{Pic}(Q_{\overline{k}}) is free abelian of bounded rank. First a numerically trivial line bundle NN on Qk‾Q_{\overline{k}} is trivial. Indeed, klt singularities are rational, so Euler characteristic can be computed on a resolution; Riemann–Roch there gives χ(N)=χ(OQk‾)\chi(N)=\chi(\mathcal{O}_{Q_{\overline{k}}}). Klt Kawamata–Viehweg vanishing applies to both bundles, since N−KQN-K_Q and −KQ-K_Q are ample. Hence h0(N)=h0(OQk‾)=1h^0(N)=h^0(\mathcal{O}_{Q_{\overline{k}}})=1. The divisor of a nonzero section of NN is effective and numerically trivial. Its intersection with a power of an ample divisor forces it to be zero, so NN is trivial. Pullback to a resolution therefore embeds Pic⁡(Qkˉ)\operatorname{Pic}(Q_{\bar{k}}) into the Néron–Severi group modulo numerical equivalence of that resolution: numerical triviality of a pullback implies numerical triviality downstairs by lifting curves and the projection formula. This is a free abelian group of rank at most the second Betti number. Theorem 3.4, applied to the bounded embedding with empty marking, bounds that number. This proves the claim.

The Galois action on this lattice has finite image, because its finitely many generators are defined over finite extensions. Finite subgroups of GL⁡r(Z)\operatorname{GL}_{r}(\mathbb{Z}) have bounded order for bounded rr: reduction modulo 3 is injective on each such subgroup. To recall why, the kernel has no nontrivial finite-order element. If I+3aMI+3^{a}M with a≥1a\geq1 and M≢0(mod3)M\not\equiv0\pmod{3} had prime order, the binomial expansion at that prime would have a nonzero lowest 3-adic term; every finite-order element has a power of prime order. Thus an extension F/kF/k of bounded degree fixes the class of LL.

Invariance of a class need not descend a line bundle, so one more step is necessary. Put r=h0(L)r=h^{0}(L). Choose a finite Galois field of definition of LL over FF, and isomorphisms between its conjugates. Their failure to satisfy the cocycle condition consists of scalar factors. On

L⊗r⊗(det⁡H0(L))−1(4)L^{\otimes r}\otimes\left(\det H^{0}(L)\right)^{-1} \tag*{(4)}

these factors cancel: a scalar acts to the rrth power on both factors. This gives effective descent data. The required isomorphisms exist over the chosen field of definition because two line bundles that become isomorphic over an algebraic closure are already isomorphic over that field on a proper geometrically integral variety: apply base change to the sections of their quotient and its inverse. Consequently (3.3) descends to a line bundle AA on QFQ_{F} whose geometric class is L⊗rL^{\otimes r}. It is very ample and has bounded degree and bounded h0(A)h^{0}(A).

A bounded marked support. The principal-divisor identity implies that nΛn\Lambda is integral, since KQK_{Q} is an integral Weil divisor. Thus every positive coefficient of Λ\Lambda is at least 1/n1/n. On the geometric variety,

(Supp⁡Λ)red⋅Aq−1≤n(−KQ)⋅Aq−1≤n((q−1)Aq+2).(5)(\operatorname{Supp}\Lambda)_{\mathrm{red}}\cdot A^{q-1}\leq n(-K_{Q})\cdot A^{q-1}\leq n\left((q-1)A^{q}+2\right). \tag*{(5)}

For the last inequality, intersect q−1q-1 general members of ∣A∣|A|. When q>1q>1 they give a smooth curve avoiding the singular locus of the normal variety, and adjunction says

(−KQ)⋅Aq−1=(q−1)Aq+2−2g≤(q−1)Aq+2.(-K_{Q})\cdot A^{q-1}=(q-1)A^{q}+2-2g\leq(q-1)A^{q}+2.

For q=1q=1 the same formula is the usual degree formula on a smooth curve. Hence the embedded pair (QF,(Supp⁡Λ)red)(Q_{F},(\operatorname{Supp}\Lambda)_{\mathrm{red}}) satisfies the hypotheses of Theorem 3.4 with uniform bounds.

The orbit of a valuation. Choose the resolution supplied there over FF, and write KW+BW=p∗(KQ+Λ)K_{W}+B_{W}=p^{*}(K_{Q}+\Lambda). Its geometric reduced divisor HH contains the support of BWB_{W}. Since (Q,Λ)(Q,\Lambda) is lc, BW≤HB_{W}\leq H. For every geometric extension vˉ\bar{v} of vv,

0≤a(vˉ,Wkˉ,H)≤a(vˉ,Wkˉ,BW)<1.0\leq a(\bar{v},W_{\bar{k}},H)\leq a(\bar{v},W_{\bar{k}},B_{W})<1.

The left-hand discrepancy is integral, hence zero. By Theorem 3.2, vˉ\bar{v} is determined by its centre stratum and its weights on the components of HH. The Galois subgroup over FF that fixes all the geometric components and strata fixes each such valuation: its centre and weights cannot change. There are at most MM objects in this finite set, so each orbit over FF has size at most M!M!. Its full orbit over kk has size at most [F:k]M![F:k]M!. These are uniformly bounded, proving the proposition. □\square

Birational preparation and adjunction

Making the distinguished component positive

Lemma 4.1. For (X,B)(X,B) as in Theorem 1.1, there is a projective birational morphism h:Y→Xh:Y\to X with YY Q\mathbb{Q}-factorial and klt such that the crepant boundary BYB_{Y} is effective. The strict transform of every component of BB has its original coefficient.

Proof. Take a projective resolution and run a relative KK-MMP with ample scaling over XX. In this birational setting every divisor class, including the zero boundary, is big over XX: the generic fibre is a point. The big-boundary MMP applies. A Mori fibre space over XX cannot be an output, since its total space is birational to XX, whereas its base would have smaller dimension and still dominate XX. We therefore obtain a Q\mathbb{Q}-factorial klt minimal model h:Y→Xh:Y \to X. Write

KY+BY=h∗(KX+B).K_Y+B_Y=h^*(K_X+B).

Minimality says that −BY-B_Y is nef over XX, and h∗BY=B≥0h_*B_Y=B\geq0. The negativity lemma gives BY≥0B_Y\geq0. Crepancy proves the remaining assertions. □

Lemma 4.2. Let XX be a Q\mathbb{Q}-factorial klt projective variety, (X,B)(X,B) an effective lc pair with KX+B∼Q0K_X+B\sim_{\mathbb{Q}}0, and SS a component of coefficient at least t>0t>0. Fix a rational bb with 0<b<t0<b<t. There is a sequence of birational MMP steps preserving SS, followed by a Mori fibre contraction X1→Z1X_1\to Z_1, such that S1S_1 is ample over Z1Z_1 and (X1,B1)(X_1,B_1) is an effective lc log Calabi–Yau pair. If Z1Z_1 is a point and H0(X,OX)=kH^0(X,\mathcal{O}_X)=k, then

Z1=Spec⁡k,−KX1 ample,−KX1−bS1 nef.Z_1=\operatorname{Spec} k,\qquad-K_{X_1}\text{ ample},\qquad-K_{X_1}-bS_1\text{ nef}.

Proof. Set D=KX+B−bS∼Q−bSD=K_X+B-bS\sim_{\mathbb{Q}}-bS. It is not pseudo-effective, since its intersection with a fixed ample divisor to the power d−1d-1 is negative. Choose an ample rational divisor HH and δ>0\delta>0 rational and small enough that D+δHD+\delta H remains outside the pseudo-effective cone.

There is an effective klt boundary Δ\Delta with KX+Δ∼QD+δHK_X+\Delta\sim_{\mathbb{Q}}D+\delta H. Indeed, (X,B−bS)(X,B-bS) is lc and XX is klt, so (X,(1−η)(B−bS))(X,(1-\eta)(B-bS)) is klt for 0<η≪10<\eta\ll1. The class δH+η(B−bS)\delta H+\eta(B-bS) is ample for sufficiently small η\eta. Represent it by a general effective rational divisor with small coefficients, preserving klt, and add this divisor to (1−η)(B−bS)(1-\eta)(B-bS).

Run the MMP for KX+ΔK_X+\Delta with scaling by a sufficiently large multiple mHmH. At a ray RR used by the program, including the final Mori fibre ray, write Li=Di+δHiL_i=D_i+\delta H_i for the transformed class. The scaling condition gives

Li⋅R<0,(Li+λimHi)⋅R=0,λi≥0.L_i\cdot R<0,\qquad(L_i+\lambda_i mH_i)\cdot R=0,\qquad\lambda_i\geq0.

It follows that λi>0\lambda_i>0, Hi⋅R>0H_i\cdot R>0, and hence Di⋅R<0D_i\cdot R<0. Thus every step is positive on SiS_i. The divisor SiS_i cannot be contracted by a divisorial step: if it were, it would be an effective exceptional divisor nef over that contraction, in contradiction with the negativity lemma. Flips do not contract divisors.

The resulting Mori fibre contraction has relative Picard number one, so positivity on its extremal ray makes S1S_1 relatively ample. Theorem 2.2 gives the assertions about (X1,B1)(X_1,B_1). If the base is a point, the function-field condition makes it Spec⁡k\operatorname{Spec} k. Now ρ(X1/k)=1\rho(X_1/k)=1. The nonzero effective divisor B1∼Q−KX1B_1\sim_{\mathbb{Q}}-K_{X_1} is ample, and the effective divisor B1−bS1∼Q−KX1−bS1B_1-bS_1\sim_{\mathbb{Q}}-K_{X_1}-bS_1 is nef, as asserted. □

Making a vertical prime a pullback

Lemma 4.3. Let U→ZU\to Z be a contraction with UU projective and Q\mathbb{Q}-factorial of Fano type over ZZ. Let PP be a vertical prime divisor. There is a sequence of (−P)(-P)-negative MMP steps over ZZ such that the final transform P′P' survives on a Q\mathbb{Q}-factorial klt variety U′U' and −P′-P' is semiample over ZZ. If f:U′→Z′f:U'\to Z' is its semiample contraction, then Z′→ZZ'\to Z is birational and for some integer m>0m>0 and a nonzero effective Cartier divisor TT on Z′Z',

mP′=f∗T.(4.1)mP'=f^*T. \tag*{(4.1)}

The MMP is an isomorphism over the generic point of ZZ. Every horizontal prime EE therefore survives and meets P′P'; its normalization has a nonzero effective restricted divisor P′∣EνP'|_{E^\nu}.

Proof. First −P-P is pseudo-effective over ZZ. Choose an effective Cartier divisor on ZZ containing the proper closed image of PP. A sufficiently large multiple of its pullback has coefficient at least one along PP, so subtracting PP leaves an effective divisor.

Choose an effective klt boundary Δ\Delta for which L=−(KU+Δ)L=-(K_U+\Delta) is ample over ZZ. For a sufficiently small rational a>0a>0, the class L−aPL-aP is also relatively ample. After twisting a sufficiently divisible multiple by a divisor from ZZ, choose a general member and divide by that multiple to obtain an effective rational divisor Da∼QL−aPD_a\sim_{\mathbb{Q}}L-aP over ZZ with (U,Δ+Da)(U,\Delta+D_a) klt. Then Ψ=Δ+Da\Psi=\Delta+D_a is big over ZZ, and

KU+Ψ∼Q−aPover Z.K_U+\Psi\sim_{\mathbb{Q}}-aP\quad\text{over }Z.

The big-boundary MMP with ample scaling terminates in a minimal model U′U', since this class is relatively pseudo-effective. Its steps are (−P)(-P)-negative. As in Theorem 4.2, the negativity lemma prevents the contraction of PP. The steps are isomorphisms over a nonempty open subset of ZZ: there PP is absent and its negative has zero intersection with every curve in a fibre. In particular, every horizontal prime survives.

Put L′=KU′+Ψ′L'=K_{U'}+\Psi', which is nef over ZZ. The boundary Ψ′\Psi' is still big over ZZ, so write Ψ′∼QA′+D′\Psi'\sim_{\mathbb{Q}}A'+D' over ZZ with A′A' relatively ample and D′≥0D'\geq0. For sufficiently small rational η>0\eta>0, the effective boundary

Θ′=(1−η)Ψ′+ηD′\Theta'=(1-\eta)\Psi'+\eta D'

is klt and satisfies

L′−(KU′+Θ′)∼QηA′over Z.L'-(K_{U'}+\Theta')\sim_{\mathbb{Q}}\eta A'\quad\text{over }Z.

Klt base point freeness applies to a sufficiently divisible nef Cartier multiple of L′L' [[10], Theorem 11.1]. Thus L′L', and consequently −P′-P', is semiample over ZZ. The relative theorem can also be applied geometrically and descended: relative generation of sections is detected by faithfully flat base change.

Let f:U′→Z′f:U'\to Z' be the associated contraction. On the generic fibre over ZZ, the line bundle of a multiple of P′P' is trivial and the field of global functions is k(Z)k(Z). Hence Z′→ZZ'\to Z is birational. Choose m>0m>0 such that mP′mP' is Cartier and OU′(−mP′)=f∗A\mathcal{O}_{U'}(-mP')=f^*\mathcal{A} for a line bundle A\mathcal{A} on Z′Z'. The canonical section of OU′(mP′)=f∗A−1\mathcal{O}_{U'}(mP')=f^*\mathcal{A}^{-1} descends, by f∗OU′=OZ′f_*\mathcal{O}_{U'}=\mathcal{O}_{Z'} and the projection formula, to a section of A−1\mathcal{A}^{-1}. Its divisor is a nonzero effective Cartier divisor TT, and its pullback is exactly mP′mP', proving (4.1).

A horizontal prime EE dominates Z′Z' and, being proper, maps onto Z′Z'. Thus it meets f−1(T)f^{-1}(T). It is not contained there, so pulling back TT to its normalization gives a nonzero effective Cartier divisor. Dividing by mm proves the final assertion. □

Adjunction with a specified index

Lemma 4.4. Let (U,C)(U,C) be an effective lc Q\mathbb{Q}-pair over kk, let EE be a prime component of coefficient one, and suppose n(KU+C)∼0n(K_U+C)\sim0. On the normalization ν:Eν→E\nu:E^\nu\to E there is an effective different CEνC_{E^\nu} such that

(Eν,CEν) is lc,n(KEν+CEν)∼0.(E^\nu,C_{E^\nu})\text{ is lc},\qquad n(K_{E^\nu}+C_{E^\nu})\sim0.

In particular, nCEνnC_{E^\nu} is integral and every positive coefficient of CEνC_{E^\nu} is at least 1/n1/n. If P≠EP\ne E is a Q\mathbb{Q}-Cartier prime component of CC of coefficient β>0\beta>0, then

CEν≥βP∣Eν.(4.2)C_{E^\nu}\geq\beta P|_{E^\nu}. \tag*{(4.2)}

Proof. Divisorial adjunction gives an effective lc different on the normalization, geometrically and over kk; its residue construction is compatible with field extension. We verify that it retains the specified index nn, rather than an unspecified multiple. For the construction see [7], Definition 122 and equations (122.7)–(122.10)] and [8]. Choose a nonzero rational top differential ω\omega on UU, and write KU=div⁡(ω)K_U = \operatorname{div}(\omega). The relation in the hypothesis provides a rational nn-canonical form τ\tau with

div⁡(τ)=−nC.\operatorname{div}(\tau) = -nC.

At the generic point of EE, the variety is regular and EE has coefficient one. The logarithmic nn-fold residue of τ\tau along EE therefore defines a nonzero rational nn-canonical form ρ\rho on EνE^{\nu}, over kk. Residue commutes with powers. After passing to k‾\overline{k} and taking any sufficiently divisible power, the usual pluri-residue definition of the different gives

div⁡(ρ)+nCEν=0.\operatorname{div}(\rho) + nC_{E^{\nu}} = 0.

Indeed, the identity for that power is the positive integral multiple of this identity. It consequently holds already for ρ\rho over kk. This proves the principal-divisor assertion at index nn, and also that nCEνnC_{E^{\nu}} is integral. There is no gluing across different normalizations here; the construction is on the single normalized prime EνE^{\nu}.

For (4.2), remove βP\beta P from CC. The remaining pair is effective and lc and still has coefficient one along EE, so its different is effective. After a common Cartier multiple, the two log pluricanonical sheaves differ by the tensor factor OU(mβP)\mathcal{O}_U(m\beta P), and their residues differ by its restriction to EνE^{\nu}. Dividing by mm shows that adding βP\beta P adds exactly βP∣Eν\beta P|_{E^{\nu}} to the different. This comparison does not require KU+EK_U + E to be Q\mathbb{Q}-Cartier. Distinct primes over kk have disjoint sets of geometric prime components, so this restriction is defined on every geometric component of EνE^{\nu}. This proves the inequality.

Lemma 4.5. Let UU be a projective Q\mathbb{Q}-Gorenstein klt variety over an algebraically closed field of characteristic zero, and let (U,C)(U,C) be lc with C≥0C \ge0. Given b>0b > 0, at most 2/b2/b prime components of CC with coefficient at least bb can contain a fixed irreducible codimension-two subvariety of UU.

Proof. Take general very ample hyperplane sections down to a surface, and choose a point where the surface meets a suitable dense open subset of the given codimension-two locus. The surface is normal and klt, and its restricted boundary is lc. These assertions can be checked on a log resolution: general hyperplanes meet its simple normal crossings divisors transversely, adjunction preserves the discrepancy coefficients, and the images of exceptional loci and boundary intersections are met in the expected dimensions. Each prime being counted restricts to a curve germ through the chosen point, with its original coefficient, and the germs are distinct.

It remains to bound the number of these germs at a klt surface singularity. Descend the finite data and a log resolution to an embeddable characteristic-zero field and work over C\mathbb{C}. A klt complex surface singularity is a quotient singularity [9] (Proposition 4.18); it has a finite smooth analytic uniformizing cover étale in codimension one. The crepant pullback of the pair is lc by the finite-cover discrepancy formula. Each curve germ pulls back to at least one curve through the point upstairs, with at least its original coefficient, and different germs have no common curve component. Blowing up this smooth surface point gives the log discrepancy

2−mult⁡0(Cup)≥0.2 - \operatorname{mult}_{0}(C_{\mathrm{up}}) \ge0.

If there are rr original germs, their contributions give rb≤mult⁡0(Cup)≤2rb \le\operatorname{mult}_{0}(C_{\mathrm{up}}) \le2. Thus r≤2/br \le2/b, as required.

Proof of the arithmetic bound

We prove Theorem 1.1 by induction on dd, proving the assertion for all positive thresholds simultaneously in each dimension. For t>1t>1 the assertion is vacuous. Henceforth 0<t≤10<t\leq1.

The curve case

For d=1d=1, XX is a smooth projective geometrically integral curve. Since BB has a positive component and KX+B∼Q0K_X+B\sim_{\mathbb{Q}}0,

0<deg⁡B=2−2g(X).0<\deg B=2-2g(X).

Thus g(X)=0g(X)=0 and deg⁡B=2\deg B=2. If SS is a component with coefficient at least tt, then SS is a closed point and

t c(S/k)=t[k(S):k]≤deg⁡B=2.t\,c(S/k)=t[k(S):k]\leq\deg B=2.

We may take N(1,t)=⌈2/t⌉N(1,t)=\lceil2/t\rceil in the substantive range.

Fix d≥2d\geq2 and assume the theorem in every smaller dimension and for every positive threshold. Write

M<d(u)=max⁡1≤r<dN(r,u),u>0.(5.1)M_{<d}(u)=\max_{1\leq r<d}N(r,u),\qquad u>0. \tag*{(5.1)}

These are finite numbers by the induction hypothesis.

An ample component and a bounded complement

Use Theorem 4.1 to replace XX by a Q\mathbb{Q}-factorial klt variety, with effective crepant lc boundary and the same divisorial valuation SS. Its constant degree is unchanged. Choose once and for all a rational number

0<b=b(t)<t.(5.2)0<b=b(t)<t. \tag*{(5.2)}

Apply Theorem 4.2 to obtain a Mori fibre contraction X1→Z1X_1\to Z_1 on which S1S_1 is relatively ample. If dim⁡Z1>0\dim Z_1>0, the divisor S1S_1 is horizontal: an effective vertical divisor is trivial on the generic fibre and cannot be relatively ample on a positive-dimensional fibre. Its coefficient in B1B_1 is at least tt, so the generic-fibre induction gives

c(S/k)≤M<d(t).(6)c(S/k)\leq M_{<d}(t). \tag*{(6)}

We may therefore assume Z1=Spec⁡kZ_1=\operatorname{Spec} k. Now S1S_1 and −KX1-K_{X_1} are ample, and −KX1−bS1-K_{X_1}-bS_1 is nef. Theorem 3.1 supplies an integer n=n(d,b)n=n(d,b) and a boundary C1C_1 over kk satisfying

(X1,C1) lc,C1≥bS1,n(KX1+C1)∼0.(7)(X_1,C_1)\ \mathrm{lc},\qquad C_1\geq bS_1,\qquad n(K_{X_1}+C_1)\sim0. \tag*{(7)}

The index nn is independent of the field, the original boundary, and its denominators.

A Mori fibre space with controlled singularities

Set ϵ=1/n\epsilon=1/n. By Theorem 3.3, there are only finitely many valuations with a(v,X1,0)<ϵa(v,X_1,0)<\epsilon. They are exceptional, since a divisor on X1X_1 has log discrepancy one for the zero boundary. Every such valuation is an lc place of (X1,C1)(X_1,C_1). Indeed, the principal-divisor identity in (7) implies

a(v,X1,C1)∈1nZ,0≤a(v,X1,C1)≤a(v,X1,0)<1n.a(v,X_1,C_1)\in\frac{1}{n}\mathbb{Z},\qquad0\leq a(v,X_1,C_1)\leq a(v,X_1,0)<\frac{1}{n}.

so the first discrepancy is zero. The middle inequality uses that C1C_1 is effective and Q\mathbb{Q}-Cartier.

Extract exactly these exceptional divisors by π:X2→X1\pi:X_2\to X_1, using the extraction theorem for the klt pair (X1,0)(X_1,0). The variety X2X_2 is Q\mathbb{Q}-factorial, and the crepant pair (X2,C2)(X_2,C_2) is effective and lc, with coefficient one on each π\pi-exceptional divisor. Moreover X2X_2 is ϵ\epsilon-lc. To see this, write

KX2+G=π∗KX1,G=∑F exceptional(1−a(F,X1,0))F≥0.K_{X_2}+G=\pi^*K_{X_1},\qquad G=\sum_{F\ \mathrm{exceptional}}\left(1-a(F,X_1,0)\right)F\geq0.

For valuations not extracted, effectivity and Q\mathbb{Q}-Cartierness of GG give a(v,X2,0)≥a(v,X1,0)≥ϵa(v,X_2,0)\geq a(v,X_1,0)\geq\epsilon. Each extracted valuation now has log discrepancy one on X2X_2 with zero boundary. Since KX2∼Q−C2K_{X_2} \sim_{\mathbb{Q}} -C_2 and C2C_2 is nonzero and effective, KX2K_{X_2} is not pseudo-effective. Run a KX2K_{X_2}-MMP with ample scaling to a Mori fibre contraction

X2⇢X3→gZ.(8)X_2 \dashrightarrow X_3 \xrightarrow{g} Z. \tag*{(8)}

The variety X3X_3 is Q\mathbb{Q}-factorial and ϵ\epsilon-lc, since log discrepancies do not decrease along this MMP. By Theorem 2.2, its transformed boundary satisfies

(X3,C3) lc,C3≥0,n(KX3+C3)∼0.(X_3,C_3)\ \mathrm{lc}, \qquad C_3 \ge0, \qquad n(K_{X_3}+C_3) \sim0.

Let vSv_S denote the original valuation of SS, whether or not it survives as a divisor on X3X_3. Crepancy gives

a(vS,X3,C3)≤1−b<1.(9)a(v_S,X_3,C_3) \le1-b < 1. \tag*{(9)}

If dim⁡Z=0\dim Z=0, then Z=Spec⁡kZ=\operatorname{Spec} k and X3X_3 is an ϵ\epsilon-lc Fano variety. Theorem 3.5 proves

c(S/k)≤A(d,1/n,n).(10)c(S/k) \le A(d,1/n,n). \tag*{(10)}

We henceforth assume 0<dim⁡Z<d0 < \dim Z < d.

Recovering the divisor over a positive-dimensional base

We first realize vSv_S as a prime PP on a model of Fano type over ZZ. For a sufficiently small rational λ>0\lambda> 0, set Γ=(1−λ)C3\Gamma=(1-\lambda)C_3. The pair (X3,Γ)(X_3,\Gamma) is klt: its log discrepancies are the corresponding convex combinations for the klt pair (X3,0)(X_3,0) and the lc pair (X3,C3)(X_3,C_3). Also

−(KX3+Γ)∼Q−λKX3-(K_{X_3}+\Gamma) \sim_{\mathbb{Q}} -\lambda K_{X_3}

is ample over ZZ. By (5.6), λ\lambda can be chosen so that a(vS,X3,Γ)<1a(v_S,X_3,\Gamma)<1.

If vSv_S is exceptional over X3X_3, extract it alone by a projective birational morphism h:U→X3h:U\to X_3 with UU Q\mathbb{Q}-factorial. Otherwise set U=X3U=X_3. The crepant boundaries for C3C_3 and Γ\Gamma are both effective: on the possible new exceptional prime their coefficients are respectively 1−a(vS,X3,C3)≥b1-a(v_S,X_3,C_3)\ge b and 1−a(vS,X3,Γ)>01-a(v_S,X_3,\Gamma)>0. The first gives an lc log Calabi–Yau pair (U,CU)(U,C_U) with the same principal multiple nn; the second gives a klt pair (U,ΓU)(U,\Gamma_U) whose anti-log canonical divisor LL is nef and big over ZZ.

This makes UU of Fano type over ZZ in the ample sense used above. Indeed, write L∼QA+DL\sim_{\mathbb{Q}} A+D over ZZ, with AA relatively ample and D≥0D\ge0. For sufficiently small η>0\eta>0, the boundary ΓU+ηD\Gamma_U+\eta D is effective and klt, and

−(KU+ΓU+ηD)∼QL−ηD∼Q(1−η)L+ηA-(K_U+\Gamma_U+\eta D) \sim_{\mathbb{Q}} L-\eta D \sim_{\mathbb{Q}} (1-\eta)L+\eta A

is ample over ZZ.

Let PP denote the prime realizing vSv_S on UU. If PP is horizontal over ZZ, its coefficient in CUC_U is at least bb and the generic-fibre induction gives

c(S/k)=c(P/k)≤M<d(b).(11)c(S/k)=c(P/k)\le M_{<d}(b). \tag*{(11)}

It remains to treat the case where PP is vertical.

A horizontal coefficient-one component

The bigness established before the second MMP now supplies the component needed for adjunction. On X2X_2 the divisor π∗S1\pi^*S_1 is effective and big. Its support is contained in the strict transform of S1S_1 and the exceptional divisors of π\pi. Its pushforward to X3X_3 under (5.5) is also effective and big. For completeness, bigness survives this pushforward because every section of a divisible multiple upstairs is a rational function with nonnegative divisor on every prime that remains downstairs. The birational map extracts no divisors, so these sections inject into the corresponding spaces downstairs; the growth of order mdm^d is retained.

An effective big divisor on X3X_3 cannot have only vertical components over ZZ. Such a divisor restricts to zero on the generic fibre, whereas a big divisor restricts to a big class: restrict a Kodaira decomposition into an ample rational divisor and an effective divisor. The generic fibre has positive dimension, so its zero class is not big.

The transform of S1S_1, if present on X3X_3, is vertical because vSv_S has vertical centre. Hence some horizontal component E3E_3 of the pushforward of π∗S1\pi^*S_1 comes from a π\pi-exceptional divisor. All of those have coefficient one in C2C_2, and their uncontracted transforms have coefficient one in C3C_3. We have therefore found

E3⊂⌊C3⌋,E3 horizontal over Z.(5.9)E_3 \subset\lfloor C_3\rfloor,\qquad E_3\text{ horizontal over }Z. \tag*{(5.9)}

The generic-fibre induction at threshold one gives

c(E3/k)≤M<d(1).(12)c(E_3/k)\leq M_{<d}(1). \tag*{(12)}

Intersection, adjunction, and counting conjugates

Apply Theorem 4.3 to U/ZU/Z and PP. We obtain a model U′U' with a contraction f:U′→Z′f:U'\to Z', birational Z′→ZZ'\to Z, and mP′=f∗TmP'=f^*T for a nonzero effective Cartier divisor TT on Z′Z'. The transform EE of E3E_3 survives and is horizontal. Its coefficient in the crepant boundary C′C' remains one, the coefficient of P′P' is at least bb, and

(U′,C′) lc,C′≥0,n(KU′+C′)∼0.(U',C')\ \mathrm{lc},\qquad C'\geq0,\qquad n(K_{U'}+C')\sim0.

In particular, P′≠EP'\neq E. Since E→Z′E\to Z' is surjective, P′∣EνP'|_{E^\nu} is a nonzero effective rational divisor.

The vertical case

Figure 1. The vertical case. The map ι\iota is normalization followed by inclusion. Surjectivity gives mι∗P′=(f∘ι)∗T≠0m\iota^*P'=(f\circ\iota)^*T\neq0. A prime component JJ of this pullback maps finitely onto a codimension-two subvariety of U′U'.

Take a prime component JJ of P′∣EνP'|_{E^\nu}. By Theorem 4.4, its coefficient in the different CEνC_{E^\nu} is positive and hence at least 1/n1/n. View EνE^\nu over its own field of constants kEk_E. By Theorem 2.1, this is a normal geometrically integral projective variety of dimension d−1d-1 over kEk_E, with

[kE:k]=c(E/k)=c(E3/k)≤M<d(1).[k_E:k]=c(E/k)=c(E_3/k)\leq M_{<d}(1).

Since kE/kk_E/k is finite separable, changing the ground field from kk to kEk_E does not alter its canonical divisor. The adjunction pair is therefore a log Calabi–Yau pair over kEk_E. Induction in dimension d−1d-1 at threshold 1/n1/n gives

c(J/kE)≤N(d−1,1/n).c(J/k_E)\leq N(d-1,1/n).

As kE⊂k(J)k_E \subset k(J), degrees in the tower of constant fields multiply, and hence

c(J/k)=[kE:k]c(J/kE)≤M<d(1)N(d−1,1/n).(13)c(J/k)=[k_E:k]c(J/k_E)\le M_{<d}(1)N(d-1,1/n). \tag*{(13)}

Finally work over k‾\overline{k}. Choose a geometric component J0J_0 of JJ and let W0W_0 be its image on Uk‾′U'_{\overline{k}}. The normalization map is finite, so W0W_0 has dimension d−2d-2 and is contained in a geometric prime component of P′P'. The geometric components of P′P' form a single Galois orbit. Thus every one of them contains an image of a conjugate of J0J_0: conjugate both the chosen containment and J0J_0.

There are at most c(J/k)c(J/k) such images. For each image, Theorem 4.5 bounds by 2/b2/b the number of components of Pk‾′P'_{\overline{k}} that contain it, since all these components have coefficient at least bb in Ck‾′C'_{\overline{k}} and Uk‾′U'_{\overline{k}} is Q\mathbb{Q}-Gorenstein klt. Counting the incidences, with repeated images only increasing the upper bound, yields

c(S/k)=c(P′/k)≤2bc(J/k)≤2bM<d(1)N(d−1,1/n).(14)c(S/k)=c(P'/k)\le\frac{2}{b}c(J/k)\le\frac{2}{b}M_{<d}(1)N(d-1,1/n). \tag*{(14)}

Uniformity and conclusion

The four cases (5.3)(5.3), (5.7)(5.7), (5.8)(5.8), and (5.12)(5.12) exhaust the proof. In particular, after choosing b=b(t)b=b(t) and n=n(d,b)n=n(d,b), it suffices to take an integer majorant of

max⁡{M<d(t),M<d(b),A(d,1/n,n),2bM<d(1)N(d−1,1/n)}.(15)\max\left\{ \begin{array}{c} M_{<d}(t),\quad M_{<d}(b),\quad A(d,1/n,n),\\[2pt] \frac{2}{b}M_{<d}(1)N(d-1,1/n) \end{array} \right\}. \tag*{(15)}

Every inductive term involves a strictly smaller ambient dimension. All thresholds and the complement index depend only on d,td,t. Neither the field, any original coefficient denominator, the number of extracted divisors, nor the auxiliary small perturbations enters this maximum. Thus it defines a finite bound depending only on d,td,t and closes the induction.

For the original possibly nonnormal component SS, the injection H0(S,OS)↪H0(Sν,OSν)H^0(S,\mathcal{O}_S)\hookrightarrow H^0(S^\nu,\mathcal{O}_{S^\nu}) now gives the claimed Stein-degree bound. This proves Theorem 1.1. □

References

  1. [1]E. Bierstone, P. D. Milman, and M. Temkin, Q-universal desingularization, Asian J. Math. 15 (2011), 229–250. doi:10.4310/AJM.2011.v15.n2.a5.DOI
  2. [2]C. Birkar, Anti-pluricanonical systems on Fano varieties, Ann. of Math. 190 (2019), 345–463. doi:10.4007/annals.2019.190.2.1.DOI
  3. [3]C. Birkar, Singularities of linear systems and boundedness of Fano varieties, Ann. of Math. 193 (2021), 347–405. doi:10.4007/annals.2021.193.2.1.DOI
  4. [4]C. Birkar, Stein degree of proper morphisms, arXiv:2603.23939v1 (2026).arxiv.org/abs/2603.23939
  5. [5]C. Birkar, P. Cascini, C. D. Hacon, and J. McKernan, Existence of minimal models for varieties of log general type, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 23 (2010), 405–468. doi:10.1090/S0894-0347-09-00649-3.DOI
  6. [6]C. Birkar and S. Qu, Stein degree on log Calabi–Yau fibrations, arXiv:2509.20948v1 (2025).arxiv.org/abs/2509.20948
  7. [7]J. Kollár, Canonical models, author-hosted draft chapter, June 1, 2010, Definition 122 and formulas (122.7)–(122.10), pp. 61–62. Author’s draft; numbering is that of this draft, not the published book.
  8. [8][Kol13] J. Kollár, Singularities of the Minimal Model Program, with the collaboration of S. Kovács, Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics 200, Cambridge University Press, 2013. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139547895.DOI
  9. [9][KM98] J. Kollár and S. Mori, Birational Geometry of Algebraic Varieties, Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics 134, Cambridge University Press, 1998. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511662560.DOI
  10. [10][LM26] S. Lyu and T. Murayama, The relative minimal model program for excellent algebraic spaces and analytic spaces in equal characteristic zero, arXiv:2209.08732v4 (2026), forthcoming in Memoirs of the European Mathematical Society.

Paper details

Contents