We give a full proof that the geodesic flow of a closed surface of genus at least two with a C3+Lip metric of nonpositive curvature is ergodic with respect to Liouville measure. In a forthcoming paper, we will present the corresponding result for smooth rank-one manifolds in every dimension.
Introduction
This paper provides a full proof of the following fact. Here C3+Lip means that the third derivatives of the metric are locally Lipschitz.
Theorem 1. Let M be a closed, connected, oriented surface of genus at least two, equipped with a C3+Lip Riemannian metric of nonpositive Gaussian curvature K. Its geodesic flow is ergodic with respect to Liouville measure.
Write SM for the unit tangent bundle, π:SM→M for its projection, and gs for the geodesic flow. Normalize area to aˉ(M)=1; Liouville probability measure is dm=daˉdθ/(2π). Following Pesin’s ergodicity theorem on the regular set [7], it suffices to prove that the singular set
S={v∈SM:K(πgsv)=0 for every s∈R}
has zero Liouville measure. Indeed, gs restricted to SM∖S is ergodic for the restricted Liouville measure.
We have also proved that the geodesic flow of every closed, connected, smooth rank-one manifold of nonpositive sectional curvature and dimension at least two is ergodic with respect to Liouville measure. Here rank one means that some geodesic admits no nonzero parallel normal Jacobi field; see [1]. The proof of this higher-dimensional result will be presented separately.
Throughout, ≲ denotes an inequality up to a constant depending only on the fixed metric. In estimates involving a Fourier degree k or a heat time t, this constant is independent of both unless explicitly stated. All L2 norms are taken with respect to the normalized measures above.
Fourier modes and the connection Laplacian
Assume, towards a contradiction, that m(S)>0, and set f=1S. The set S is closed, invariant under gs, and invariant under v↦−v. If X is the geodesic vector field, then
Xf=0in distributions,f(x,−v)=f(x,v).(1)
Let V generate rotation in each oriented unit tangent circle. For k∈Z, let Ωk be the closed subspace of L2(SM) on which V=ik. In a local oriented orthonormal frame,
These local expressions define global Fourier components. Reversal invariance and Parseval’s identity give
fk=0(kodd),k∈Z∑∥fk∥22=∥f∥22=m(S).(2)
The zeroth component
f0(x)=2π1∫SxM1S(x,v)dθ
is nonnegative, and ∣fk(x,v)∣≤f0(x). Consequently, with
F=supp(f0da),dF(x)=dist(x,F),(3)
every fk, viewed as a section over M, is supported in F. Since f0=0 on {K<0}, continuity of K gives K∣F=0. The Gauss–Bonnet theorem and the genus assumption imply {K<0}=∅. Thus f0 vanishes on a nonempty open set, whereas ∫Mf0da=m(S)>0; in particular, f0 is not constant.
The metric regularity implies K∈C1+Lip. Every point of F is a maximum of K, so ∇K∣F=0. Taylor’s theorem with Lipschitz first derivative therefore yields
∣K(x)∣≲dF(x)2,∣∇K(x)∣≲dF(x).(4)
These estimates hold globally by compactness.
Put H=[V,X]. Thus H moves the base point in the direction Jv, parallel transporting v, where J denotes rotation by π/2. With the conventions of Guillemin–Kazhdan [2],
[V,X]=H,[V,H]=−X,[X,H]=KV.(5)
The three vector fields preserve Liouville measure. Define the Guillemin–Kazhdan operators
η+=21(X−iH),η−=21(X+iH).(6)
Then X=η++η−, η±:Ωk→Ωk±1, and η+∗=−η−. The degree-(2j+1) component of (1) is
η+f2j+η−f2j+2=0in distributions,j≥0.(7)
Such Fourier recurrences are used by Guillemin–Kazhdan [3], Paternain–Salo–Uhlmann [6 Sections 2 and 5] and, for invariant functions in nonpositive curvature, by Lefeuvre [5, Section 4.2.
From (5), [η+,η−]=2iKV. Integration by parts gives the Guillemin–Kazhdan energy identity [2]:
∥η+u∥22−∥η−u∥22=−2k∫SMK∣u∣2dm,u∈H1∩Ωk.(8)
In particular,
∥η+u∥22≥∥η−u∥22(k≥0).(9)
The H1 statement follows from the identity on differentiable sections by density.
Consider
L=−(X2+H2)=−2(η+η−+η−η+).(10)
The bracket identities give
[V,X2]=HX+XH,[V,H2]=−XH−HX,
so L preserves every Ωk. Let Lk be the restriction of L to Ωk. For an oriented orthonormal frame (e1,e2), write ∇e1=ω⊗e2. Horizontal differentiation of u=a(x)eikθ is represented by
Thus Lk=∇k∗∇k is elliptic. We use its nonnegative self-adjoint realization defined by the closed quadratic form ∥∇ku∥22, and set
Ptk=e−tLk(t≥0).
These are contractions on Ωk, preserve the Fourier degree, and converge strongly to the identity as t↓0. Their construction uses the spectral theorem for nonnegative self-adjoint operators.
In an orthonormal eigenbasis (ϕℓ)ℓ the expression of Ptkfk is
Ptkfk=ℓ∑e−tλℓ⟨fk,ϕℓ⟩ϕℓ.
where fk=∑ℓ⟨fk,ϕℓ⟩ϕℓ and the eigenvalues λℓ are nonnegative. For later use, the same spectral theorem and supλ≥0λe−2tλ≲t−1 give
Proof. The distance function dF is Lipschitz, with ∣∇dF∣≤1 almost everywhere. Set
E(r)=21∫Mmax{dF−r,0}(∣wr∣2+∣∇kw∣2)daˉ.
First take smooth initial data, without imposing a support condition. The spectral formula gives wrr,∇kwr∈L2, so E is absolutely continuous. Differentiating and using wrr=−∇k∗∇kw, integration by parts and the product rule give, for almost every r,
Here the Lipschitz weight times wr is an admissible H1 test section, and the inequality uses ∣∇dF∣≤1. Thus E(r)≤E(0) for every $r\ge 0.
Now choose smooth fk,N∈Ωk converging to fk in L2, and let EN be the corresponding weighted energy, with the same set F. By (14) applied to differences of solutions and Cauchy–Schwarz,
∣EN(r)−E(r)∣≲(∥fk,N∥2+∥fk∥2)∥fk,N−fk∥2⟶0.
Passing to the limit in EN(r)≤EN(0) gives E(r)≤E(0). No support condition on the approximants is needed.
Since the original datum is supported in F,
E(0)=21∫MdF∣fk∣2daˉ=0.
Hence E(r)=0, so z(r)=wr(r) and ∇kw(r) vanish almost everywhere on {dF>r}. Finally, w(r)=∫0rz(s)ds in L2, and Fs⊂Fr for 0≤s≤r, so w(r) also vanishes outside Fr. □
Proposition 3. If fk∈Ωk is supported in F, then, for every t>0,
In each calculation, the last equality uses the product rule for η±(Ku). This computation makes explicit that the commutator is first order and involves only K and its first derivatives. In particular,
∥[L,η±]u∥2≲(1+∣k∣)(∥K∇ku∥2+∥(∇K)u∥2).(22)
Although its defining expression has higher derivatives, the right-hand side of (20) or (21) defines the commutator on the form domain.
Apply Proposition 3 and the Taylor estimates (4). They give separately
Put uk(t)=Ptkfk. First, there are c>0 and t0>0 such that
∥η+u0(t)∥2≥c(0<t≤t0).(25)
Otherwise some tn↓0 would satisfy η+Ptn0f0→0 in L2. Since Ptn0f0→f0 in L2, this would imply η+f0=0 distributionally. The function f0 is real, so (6) gives Xf0=Hf0=0. These two horizontal derivatives determine the base differential of a degree-zero function; hence df0=0. On the connected surface M, a function with vanishing distributional differential is constant almost everywhere, contrary to the construction of f0. This proves (25).
Heat smoothing need not preserve the flow invariance Xf=0. The resulting error is XPtf=[X,Pt]f, where Ptf=∑kuk(t). We denote its degree-(2ℓ+1) Fourier component by
rℓ(t):=([X,Pt]f)2ℓ+1=η+u2ℓ(t)+η−u2ℓ+2(t).
Thus rℓ(t) measures the failure of the recurrence (7) after smoothing. That recurrence gives
rℓ(t)=[η+,Pt]f2ℓ+[η−,Pt]f2ℓ+2,
so Proposition 4 bounds precisely this error.
Since every Fourier component fk is supported in F, Proposition 4 gives
∥rℓ(t)∥2≲t3/2(ℓ+1)(∥f2ℓ∥2+∥f2ℓ+2∥2).(26)
The Guillemin–Kazhdan inequality (9) and the triangle inequality imply
Choose one a>0, with a≤t0, sufficiently small that the last bound at t=a/j is at most c/2, for every j≥1. Combining (25), (27), (28), and (12) yields
2c≤∥η+Pa/j2jf2j∥2≲(aj)1/2∥f2j∥2.
Consequently ∥f2j∥22≳j−1, with a positive constant independent of j. A final application of Parseval’s identity gives the contradiction
∞>∥f∥22≥j=1∑∞∥f2j∥22≳j=1∑∞j1=∞.
Hence m(S)=0. Pesin’s theorem on the regular set [7] proves Theorem 1.
AI use acknowledgement
We used ChatGPT (OpenAI) to assist with mathematical arguments, exposition, and reference searches. The authors take full responsibility for the content of this paper.
References
[1]W. Ballmann, M. Brin, and P. Eberlein, Structure of manifolds of nonpositive curvature. I, Ann. of Math. (2) 122 (1985), no. 1, 171–203. doi:10.2307/1971373.DOI
[2]V. Guillemin and D. Kazhdan, Some inverse spectral results for negatively curved 2-manifolds, Topology 19 (1980), no. 3, 301–312. doi:10.1016/0040-9383(80)90015-4.DOI
[3]V. Guillemin and D. Kazhdan, On the cohomology of certain dynamical systems, Topology 19 (1980), no. 3, 291–299. doi:10.1016/0040-9383(80)90014-2.DOI
[4]Y. Kannai, Off diagonal short time asymptotics for fundamental solution of diffusion equation, Comm. Partial Differential Equations 2 (1977), no. 8, 781–830. doi:10.1080/03605307708820048.DOI
[6]G. P. Paternain, M. Salo, and G. Uhlmann, Spectral rigidity and invariant distributions on Anosov surfaces, J. Differential Geom. 98 (2014), no. 1, 147–181. doi:10.4310/jdg/1406137697.DOI
[7]Ya. B. Pesin, Geodesic flows on closed Riemannian manifolds without focal points, Math. USSR-Izv. 11 (1977), no. 6, 1195–1228. doi:10.1070/IM1977v011n06ABEH001766.DOI
Olayemi Adeyemi, Ron Buckmire, Ranthony A. Clark, Shanzhen Gao, Jakini Kauba, Lakeshia Legette-Jones, Apoorva Mate, Omayra Ortega, José Pabón, Robin T. Wilson ·