alphaFeedback

WorksMathematics

Entropy and periodic points in pseudo-Anosov isotopy classes

AI contributions
  • ChatGPT · OpenAI
View details

Abstract

Let ff be a pseudo-Anosov homeomorphism of a closed orientable surface of genus at least two. We prove that, for every C∞C^\infty diffeomorphism gg isotopic to ff, the exponential growth rate of the number of nonempty Nielsen classes of its iterates equals htop(g)h_{\mathrm{top}}(g) if and only if htop(g)=htop(f)h_{\mathrm{top}}(g)=h_{\mathrm{top}}(f). Thus Nielsen growth captures the full entropy precisely for representatives minimizing entropy in their isotopy class. For C1+αC^{1+α} diffeomorphisms, α>0α>0, we identify this growth rate with the entropy of the global orbit quotient in Fathi's hyperbolic extension and establish Bowen's periodic-point formula for the quotient. We also prove that quotient entropy is upper semicontinuous in the C0C^0 topology throughout the isotopy class and continuous at every C1+αC^{1+α} diffeomorphism, even under perturbations by arbitrary homeomorphisms in the class.

Introduction

Let MM be a closed connected orientable surface of genus at least two. The Nielsen–Thurston classification [29] describes its mapping classes in terms of periodic, reducible, and pseudo-Anosov representatives. Periodic representatives have finite order. Reducible representatives preserve a nonempty finite collection of disjoint essential simple closed curves; after cutting along a suitable such collection and passing to an iterate, the induced mapping classes on the complementary components are periodic or pseudo-Anosov. The pseudo-Anosov pieces are therefore the source of positive entropy in the canonical decomposition. Their importance for dynamics lies in the complexity they impose on every representative of the isotopy class.

We fix a pseudo-Anosov homeomorphism f:M→Mf:M\to M. It preserves two transverse singular measured foliations, multiplying their transverse measures by λ\lambda and λ−1\lambda^{-1}, where λ>1\lambda>1 is its stretch factor. This expansion and contraction determine its entropy, which is minimal in its isotopy class:

htop(f)=log⁡λ=inf⁡{htop(g):g isotopic to f}.h_{\mathrm{top}}(f)=\log\lambda=\inf\{h_{\mathrm{top}}(g):g\text{ isotopic to }f\}.

Thus the isotopy class already requires positive entropy, while its representatives may have additional dynamical complexity.

The complexity of map is typically related to the presence of periodic points. In the case of surfaces, the powerful Nielsen’s fixed point theory [21] provides a way to group periodic points according to some topological criterion. Let g≃fg\simeq f and n≥1n\geq1 where, from now on, g≃fg\simeq f means that gg is isotopic to ff.

Definition 1.1. Two points p,q∈Fix⁡(gn)p,q\in\operatorname{Fix}(g^n) are Nielsen equivalent if there is a path cc from pp to qq such that cc and gn∘cg^n\circ c are homotopic while their endpoints remain fixed.

The resulting equivalence classes are the Nielsen classes of gng^n. We denote

Cn(g)=#{nonempty Nielsen classes of gn}.C_n(g)=\#\{\text{nonempty Nielsen classes of }g^n\}.

Key words and phrases. Pseudo-Anosov homeomorphism, Nielsen classes, entropy of maximal entropy.

P.D. Carrasco was partially supported by CNPq (Produtividade em Pesquisa) 305197/2025-8, Projeto Universal CNPq 401737/2025-0, FAPEMIG APQ-02338-24, and CAPES through the MATH-AMSUD program.

F. Rodriguez-Hertz was partially supported by NSF grant DMS-2453688. and define

hN(g)=lim sup⁡n→∞1nlog⁡max⁡{1,Cn(g)}.(1)h_N(g)=\limsup_{n\to\infty}\frac{1}{n}\log\max\{1,C_n(g)\}. \tag*{(1)}

We count every nonempty class. Our purpose is to determine how much of the dynamical complexity of gg is detected by the growth of these classes, and when this growth captures its full topological entropy.

The basic bounds are

htop⁡(f)=hN(f)≤hN(g)≤htop⁡(g).h_{\operatorname{top}}(f)=h_N(f)\le h_N(g)\le h_{\operatorname{top}}(g).

Handel’s results [13 Corollary 3.6] characterize the minimum: hN(g)=htop⁡(f)h_N(g)=h_{\operatorname{top}}(f) precisely when gg admits a semiconjugacy onto ff homotopic to the identity. To compare Nielsen growth with the entropy of other representatives, we use Fathi’s hyperbolic extension [10] and the global orbit quotients constructed in [23]. These quotients place the dynamics of every representative inside a common ambient system.

Let M~\widetilde{M} be the universal cover of MM, with deck group Γ\Gamma, and fix a lift FF of ff. Collapsing each leaf of the lifted stable or unstable foliation gives a real tree TsT^s or TuT^u, respectively, whose metric is induced by the transverse measure. Write T^s\widehat{T}^s and T^u\widehat{T}^u for their metric completions, and let

T=T^s×T^uT=\widehat{T}^s\times\widehat{T}^u
Z=T/Γ.Z=T/\Gamma.

where Γ\Gamma acts diagonally. The lift FF induces a product homeomorphism Φ~\widetilde{\Phi} of TT, expanding distances in T^s\widehat{T}^s by λ\lambda and contracting distances in T^u\widehat{T}^u by λ−1\lambda^{-1}. The superscript records the foliation being collapsed: the stable-leaf tree is the expanding coordinate. The product map descends to a homeomorphism Φ:Z→Z\Phi:Z\to Z. The pairs of intersecting stable and unstable leaves determine an embedded copy L(f)L(f) of MM in ZZ, and Φ∣L(f)\left.\Phi\right|_{L(f)} is conjugate to ff.

For g≃fg\simeq f, choose the lift GG obtained by lifting an isotopy from ff to gg, starting at FF.

Definition 1.2. Two points x,y∈Mx,y\in M are globally orbit equivalent if suitable lifts satisfy

x∼gy⟺sup⁡n∈ZD(Gnx~,Gny~)<∞,x\sim_g y\quad\Longleftrightarrow\quad\sup_{n\in\mathbb{Z}}D\left(G^n\widetilde{x},G^n\widetilde{y}\right)<\infty,

where DD is the lifted metric induced by the measured foliations.

Thus this relation identifies points whose lifted orbits remain at bounded distance in both time directions. Fathi’s construction gives a continuous surjection Hg:M→L(g)H_g:M\to L(g) onto a compact Φ\Phi-invariant subset of ZZ such that

Hg∘g=Φg∘Hg,Φg=Φ∣L(g),L(f)⊂L(g).H_g\circ g=\Phi_g\circ H_g,\qquad\Phi_g=\left.\Phi\right|_{L(g)},\qquad L(f)\subset L(g).

The last three authors of this article identified the fibers of HgH_g precisely [23]:

Hg(x)=Hg(y)⟺x∼gy.H_g(x)=H_g(y)\quad\Longleftrightarrow\quad x\sim_g y.

It follows that L(g)L(g) realizes the quotient M/∼gM/\sim_g, and Φg\Phi_g realizes its induced dynamics. The ambient map Φ\Phi is fixed throughout the isotopy class; the representative gg determines the invariant set L(g)L(g) on which it is restricted.

The inclusion L(f)⊂L(g)L(f)\subset L(g) expresses the persistence of the pseudo-Anosov dynamics under global shadowing. Handel [12] proved that every g≃fg\simeq f has a compact invariant subset whose dynamics factors onto ff; in this construction, that subset is

Jg=Hg−1(L(f)).J_g=H_g^{-1}(L(f)).

The complement L(g)∖L(f)L(g)\setminus L(f) records the global orbit classes that do not correspond to orbits of ff.

For periodic points, the relation with Nielsen classes is particularly direct. If p,q∈Fix⁡(gn)p,q\in\operatorname{Fix}(g^n), then Hg(p)=Hg(q)H_g(p)=H_g(q) if and only if pp and qq are Nielsen equivalent [19 Lemma 2.8]. Thus each nonempty Nielsen class of gng^n determines a point of Fix⁡(Φgn)\operatorname{Fix}(\Phi_g^n), and distinct classes determine distinct points.

Our first theorem identifies the exponential growth rates of these two counts with the entropy of the quotient.

Theorem 1.3 (Entropy formula). Let gg be a C1+αC^{1+\alpha} diffeomorphism, α>0\alpha> 0, or a C1C^1 Axiom-A diffeomorphism, in the isotopy class of ff. Then

hN(g)=htop(Φg)=lim sup⁡n→∞1nlog⁡max⁡{1,#Fix⁡(Φgn)}.h_N(g) = h_{\mathrm{top}}(\Phi_g) = \limsup_{n\to\infty} \frac{1}{n} \log\max\{1,\#\operatorname{Fix}(\Phi_g^n)\}.

This answers [23 Question 4.2] under the stated regularity hypotheses. In particular, the quotient satisfies Bowen’s periodic-point entropy formula. Although Φg\Phi_g is expansive, this formula requires an argument beyond the hyperbolicity of the ambient extension: the sets L(g)L(g) are not locally maximal, and the ambient shadowing property does not pass to their restrictions.

Our second theorem compares the entropy of the quotient with that of the surface dynamics. The geometry of L(g)L(g) is essential here. These spaces need not be surfaces: their local stable and unstable components are dendrites, that is, locally connected continua containing no simple closed curve. Every periodic point outside L(f)L(f) is an endpoint of both components [23]. We use this endpoint geometry together with the recent method developed by the authors [9], that relates entropy and semiconjugacy on surfaces. We emphasize that several additional difficulties appear while dealing with global orbit quotients, due to lack of any differentiable structure.

Theorem 1.4 (Strict entropy gap). If gg is a C∞C^\infty diffeomorphism isotopic to ff, then

htop(f)<htop(Φg)⟹htop(Φg)<htop(g).h_{\mathrm{top}}(f) < h_{\mathrm{top}}(\Phi_g) \quad\Longrightarrow\quad h_{\mathrm{top}}(\Phi_g) < h_{\mathrm{top}}(g).

Thus, whenever the quotient entropy exceeds the pseudo-Anosov minimum, it is strictly smaller than the entropy of the representative. Together with Theorem 1.3 and the basic entropy bounds, this shows that Nielsen growth captures the full entropy of a smooth representative precisely when that representative minimizes entropy in its isotopy class. We record this consequence as Theorem 4.2 in § 4.

Our third theorem concerns the dependence of quotient entropy on the representative.

Theorem 1.5 (Continuity of quotient entropy). On the space of homeomorphisms isotopic to ff, the map

g⟼htop(Φg)g \longmapsto h_{\mathrm{top}}(\Phi_g)

is upper semicontinuous in the C0C^0 topology. Moreover, let g≃fg \simeq f be a C1+αC^{1+\alpha} diffeomorphism, with α>0\alpha> 0. For every sequence of homeomorphisms gj≃fg_j \simeq f converging uniformly to gg, one has

htop(Φgj)⟶htop(Φg).h_{\mathrm{top}}(\Phi_{g_j}) \longrightarrow h_{\mathrm{top}}(\Phi_g).

No differentiability is required of the approximating homeomorphisms gjg_j.

Quotient entropy therefore refines the pseudo-Anosov entropy bound while remaining stable, at these representatives, under perturbations that impose no control on derivatives. This answers the continuity part of [23 Question 4.1] at C1+αC^{1+\alpha} diffeomorphisms. Together with Theorem 1.3, this implies that if gjg_j and gg are C1+αC^{1+\alpha} diffeomorphisms isotopic to ff and gj→gg_j \to g uniformly, then hN(gj)→hN(g)h_N(g_j) \to h_N(g).

The invariant foliations of ff also connect these entropy questions with Teichmüller theory. They are the horizontal and vertical foliations of a quadratic differential and determine a geodesic in Teichmüller space, the space of marked conformal structures on MM. The mapping class of ff translates along this geodesic by log⁡λ\log\lambda [4]. The minimum entropy in the isotopy class thus has a geometric interpretation: it is the translation length of the class on Teichmüller space. The projective classes of the two foliations are its two fixed points on Thurston’s boundary.

These same foliations give the dual trees used in this paper. The translation lengths of the deck transformations on each tree record intersection numbers of closed curves with the corresponding measured foliation. Such tree actions belong to the geometric picture developed by Morgan and Shalen [20], in which real trees describe degenerations of hyperbolic structures. Fathi’s construction [10] brings the two trees together in the hyperbolic system (Z,Φ)(Z,\Phi), and the sets L(g)L(g) of [23] realize the global orbit quotients of representatives throughout the isotopy class inside this common space. The geometry supplied by ff therefore also allows us to study the additional complexity of gg. Our results compare the entropy retained by this quotient with both the geometric minimum log⁡λ\log\lambda and the full entropy of the representative.

We note that in a recent preprint of García-Sassi and Tal [11], the authors consider a related quotient construction for maps in the isotopy class of a pseudo-Anosov, by collapsing maximal continua with bounded infinite orbit in the universal cover. The resulting quotient map sits above Fathi’s construction, and is CW-expansive. It seems very likely that some methods in this paper can be applied in that situation; investigating such extent remains as an interesting open problem.

The proofs proceed as follows. § 2 recalls the dual trees, Fathi’s extension, and the realization of the global orbit quotient. § 3 collects the preliminaries on hyperbolic measures, homoclinic classes, conditional measures, and horseshoes.

§ 4 proves Theorems 1.3 and 1.4 and derives Corollary 4.2. For the entropy formula, the correspondence between Nielsen classes and images of periodic points, together with expansivity, gives one inequality. For the reverse inequality, we lift positive-entropy quotient measures to hyperbolic measures on the surface. The Brin–Katok formula [6] supplies many return segments whose images in the quotient are separated; Katok’s closing lemma [15] turns these segments into periodic points belonging to distinct Nielsen classes.

The proof of the strict gap develops the geometric argument of [9]. Under entropy equality above htop⁡(f)h_{\operatorname{top}}(f), a maximal-entropy measure of the quotient lifts to a hyperbolic maximal-entropy measure with zero relative entropy over HgH_g. The conditional-measure argument recalled in § 3.3 then gives injectivity on full conditional-measure subsets of stable and unstable manifolds. Homoclinic periodic approximation provides a saddle projecting outside L(f)L(f), where the endpoint geometry forces a fold in the tree image of its unstable manifold. The HHTU Sard argument [25], in its adaptation to maximal-entropy measures [8], supplies transverse stable crossings of the folded arc. Ben Ovadia’s absolute continuity result [3] allows these crossings to be chosen in the set of injectivity, giving a contradiction. The C∞C^\infty hypothesis enters through the Sard argument.

§ 5 proves Theorem 1.5. Upper semicontinuity follows from the Hausdorff continuity of L(g)L(g) inside the common expansive ambient system. For lower semicontinuity, we incorporate returns separated in the quotient into the Katok–Mendoza construction, obtaining locally maximal horseshoes on which HgH_g is injective. Nitecki’s C0C^0 semistability theorem [22], together with expansivity, ensures that their images in the quotient persist under nearby homeomorphisms.

§ 6 presents the remaining questions.

For convenience of the reader we reproduce the unpublished article [23] in the Appendix.

Dual trees and the universal hyperbolic extension

Let MM be a closed connected orientable surface of genus at least two, and let f ⁣:M→Mf \colon M \to M be a pseudo-Anosov homeomorphism with dilatation λ>1\lambda> 1. We denote by Fs,Fu\mathcal{F}^{s},\mathcal{F}^{u} its stable and unstable measured foliations, respectively. Fix a universal covering p ⁣:M~→Mp \colon\widetilde{M} \to M, with deck group Γ\Gamma, and a lift F ⁣:M~→M~F \colon\widetilde{M} \to\widetilde{M} of ff.

We recall Fathi’s hyperbolic extension [10] and the realization of the orbit quotients in [23].

The dual trees

For σ∈{s,u}\sigma\in\{s,u\}, let

References

  1. [1]L. M. Abramov and V. A. Rokhlin, Entropy of a skew product of mappings with invariant measure, Vestnik Leningradskogo Universiteta 17 (1962), no. 7, 5–13. In Russian.
  2. [2]R. L. Adler, A. G. Konheim, and M. H. McAndrew, Topological entropy, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society 114 (1965), no. 2, 309–319.
  3. [3]S. Ben Ovadia, Invariant family of leaf measures and the Ledrappier–Young property for hyperbolic equilibrium states, Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems 43 (2023), no. 11, 3603–3635.
  4. [4]L. Bers, An extremal problem for quasiconformal mappings and a theorem by Thurston, Acta Mathematica 141 (1978), 73–98.DOI
  5. [5]R. Bowen, Equilibrium States and the Ergodic Theory of Anosov Diffeomorphisms, Lect. Notes in Math., vol. 470, Springer Verlag, 2008.
  6. [6]M. Brin and A. Katok, On local entropy, Geometric Dynamics (Rio de Janeiro, 1981) (J. Palis, Jr., ed.), Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 1007, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1983, pp. 30–38.DOI
  7. [7]D. Burguet, Periodic expansiveness of smooth surface diffeomorphisms and applications, Journal of the European Mathematical Society 22 (2020), no. 2, 413–454.arxiv.org/abs/1705.08832
  8. [8]J. Buzzi, S. Crovisier, and O. Sarig, Measures of maximal entropy for surface diffeomorphisms, Annals of Mathematics 195 (2022), no. 2, 421–508.arxiv.org/abs/1811.02240
  9. [9]P. D. Carrasco, F. Rodriguez Hertz, J. Rodriguez Hertz, and R. Ures, Entropy and semiconjugacy on surfaces, https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.03390, 2026.
  10. [10]A. Fathi, Homotopical stability of pseudo-Anosov diffeomorphisms, Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems 10 (1990), no. 2, 287–294.DOI
  11. [11]Alejo García-Sassi and Fábio Tal, Essential factors for surface homeomorphisms, 2026, arXiv:2610.16743.
  12. [12]M. Handel, Global shadowing of pseudo-Anosov homeomorphisms, Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems 5 (1985), no. 3, 373–377.DOI
  13. [13]——, Entropy and semi-conjugacy in dimension two, Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems 8 (1988), no. 4, 585–596.DOI
  14. [14]V. Yu. Kaloshin, Generic diffeomorphisms with superexponential growth of number of periodic orbits, Communications in Mathematical Physics 211 (2000), 253–271.
  15. [15]A. Katok, Lyapunov exponents, entropy and periodic orbits for diffeomorphisms, Publications Mathématiques de l’IHÉS 51 (1980), 137–173.DOI
  16. [16]A. Katok and B. Hasselblatt, Introduction to the modern theory of dynamical systems, Encyclopedia of Mathematics and its Applications, vol. 54, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1995, With a supplementary chapter by Katok and Leonardo Mendoza.
  17. [17]F. Ledrappier and J.-M. Strelcyn, A proof of the estimation from below in Pesin’s entropy formula, Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems 2 (1982), no. 2, 203–219.DOI
  18. [18]F. Ledrappier and L.-S. Young, The metric entropy of diffeomorphisms. II. relations between entropy, exponents and dimension, Annals of Mathematics 122 (1985), no. 3, 540–574.DOI
  19. [19]J. Lewowicz and R. Ures, On basic pieces of Axiom A diffeomorphisms isotopic to pseudoanosov maps, Astérisque (2003), no. 287, 125–134.
  20. [20]J. W. Morgan and P. B. Shalen, Valuations, trees, and degenerations of hyperbolic structures. I, Annals of Mathematics 120 (1984), no. 3, 401–476.
  21. [21]J. Nielsen, Untersuchungen zur Topologie der geschlossenen zweiseitigen Flächen, Acta Mathematica 50 (1927), 189–358.DOI
  22. [22]Z. Nitecki, On semi-stability for diffeomorphisms, Inventiones Mathematicae 14 (1971), 83–122.DOI
  23. [23]F. Rodriguez Hertz, J. Rodriguez Hertz, and R. Ures, Dynamics in the isotopy class of a pseudo-Anosov map, Preprint, arXiv:math/0407369, 2004.DOI
  24. [24]F. Rodriguez Hertz, M. A. Rodriguez Hertz, A. Tahzibi, and R. Ures, New criteria for ergodicity and nonuniform hyperbolicity, Duke Mathematical Journal 160 (2011), no. 3, 599–629.DOI
  25. [25]——, Uniqueness of SRB measures for transitive diffeomorphisms on surfaces, Communications in Mathematical Physics 306 (2011), no. 1, 35–49.DOI
  26. [26]V. A. Rokhlin, On the fundamental ideas of measure theory, Matematicheskii Sbornik. Novaya Seriya 25(67) (1949), no. 1, 107–150, In Russian.
  27. [27]———, Lectures on the entropy theory of measure-preserving transformations, Russian Mathematical Surveys 22 (1967), no. 5, 1–52.DOI
  28. [28]D. Ruelle, An inequality for the entropy of differentiable maps, Boletim da Sociedade Brasileira de Matemática 9 (1978), no. 1, 83–87.DOI
  29. [29]W. P. Thurston, On the geometry and dynamics of diffeomorphisms of surfaces, Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society 19 (1988), no. 2, 417–431.DOI
  30. [30]M. Viana, Lectures on Lyapunov Exponents, Cambridge Univ. Press, 2014.DOI
  31. [31]P. Walters, An introduction to Ergodic Theory, Springer, 1982.DOI

Paper details

vlnc:W_5yenhrbz
v1 · latestHistory (1)

published · Fresh — added to the Hub within the last 30 days

added ·

Usage

views · 0

downloads · 0

A view counts once per browser per day, a download each time the PDF is requested.

CC BY 4.0

Original source

  • Mathematics

ChatGPT (OpenAI) · View statement →

Looking for related papers…
Contents