alphaFeedback

WorksMathematics

Kwapień's property (K) in Lipschitz-free spaces

AI contributions
Not recorded for this paper
View details

Abstract

We prove that a Lipschitz-free space \F(M) fails Kwapień's property (K) whenever its underlying metric space MM contains a bi-Lipschitz copy of C×KC\times K, where C⊂RC\subset\R is closed with positive measure and KK contains a Cantor metric space. Consequently, this holds for every subset of Rn\R^n, n⩾2n\geqslant2, whose closure has positive measure, and for a compact planar set of Assouad dimension one. These Lipschitz-free spaces embed into no strongly weakly compactly generated space and no L1L_1-space; in the separable case their duals are not isomorphic to ℓ∞\ell_\infty. Combining our result with a decomposition of Aliaga and Medina, we show that \F(\R^n\times\Z^m) is strongly weakly compactly generated if and only if it has (K), and this occurs precisely when n⩽1n\leqslant1. In particular, \F(\R^2) does not embed isomorphically into \F(\R\times\Z), answering a question of Aliaga. The planar examples nevertheless have the Dunford–Pettis property and Pełczyński's property (V∗)(V^*) and are weakly sequentially complete.

Introduction

Kwapień’s property (K), in the formulation of Kalton and Pełczyński [15 Section 2], concerns convex blocks of weak*-null sequences in a dual Banach space. A Banach space XX has property (K) if every such sequence admits a convex block subsequence converging to zero uniformly on each weakly compact subset of XX. Equivalently, the blocks converge to zero in the Mackey topology μ(X∗,X)\mu(X^*, X). Avilés and Rodríguez [7 Corollary 2.3] show that every subspace of a strongly weakly compactly generated (SWCG) space has (K). Finite-measure L1L_1-spaces are strongly weakly compactly generated [22], so their subspaces have (K). Kwapień’s argument in Kalton and Pełczyński [15 Section 2] already shows that finite-measure L1L_1-spaces have (K).

The Lipschitz-free space of I=[0,1]I = [0, 1] is isometric to L1[0,1]L_1[0, 1] [10 Corollary 3.3] and therefore has (K). We show that already a Cantor family of suitable subsets of an interval forces failure of (K). The proof constructs a uniformly null, uniformly Lipschitz sequence whose every convex block subsequence is detected on one fixed fibre. The fibre depends on the whole block sequence. No linear extension operator on the ambient metric space is required.

All Banach spaces are real, N={1,2,…}\mathbb{N} = \{1, 2, \ldots\}, and ≅\cong denotes a Banach space isomorphism. A Cantor metric space is a metric space homeomorphic to {0,1}N\{0, 1\}^{\mathbb{N}}. On C×KC \times K, where C⊂RC \subset\mathbb{R} and (K,dK)(K, d_K) is a metric space, we use the metric

d2((x,t),(y,u))=(∣x−y∣2+dK(t,u)2)1/2.d_2((x,t),(y,u)) = \left(|x-y|^2 + d_K(t,u)^2\right)^{1/2}.

Equivalent standard product metrics give the same conclusions. We equip Rn×Zm\mathbb{R}^n \times\mathbb{Z}^m with the Euclidean metric inherited from Rn+m\mathbb{R}^{n+m}. Any other norm on Rn+m\mathbb{R}^{n+m} gives an isomorphic Lipschitz-free space, since the identity map is bi-Lipschitz.

2020 Mathematics Subject Classification. Primary 46B20, 46E15; Secondary 46A20, 28A80.

Key words and phrases. Lipschitz-free space, Kwapień’s property (K), Mackey topology, strongly weakly compactly generated space, Cantor set, Assouad dimension.

RVO: 67985840.

Theorem A. Suppose that a metric space MM contains a bi-Lipschitz copy of C×KC \times K, where C⊂RC \subset\mathbb{R} is closed and has positive Lebesgue measure, and KK contains a Cantor metric space. Then F(M)\mathcal{F}(M) fails property (K) and is isomorphic to no subspace of a strongly weakly compactly generated space or of any L1L_1-space. If MM is separable, then Lip⁡0(M)≇ℓ∞\operatorname{Lip}_0(M) \not\cong\ell_\infty.

In particular, the theorem applies to I×KI \times K for every uncountable compact metric space KK, to every cube InI^n with n≥2n \ge2, and to every normed space of dimension at least two. Indeed, every uncountable compact metric space contains a Cantor subspace.

An application to the isomorphic classification of Lipschitz-free spaces follows from Aliaga and Medina’s decomposition [5 Proposition 3.14]: for n,m≥1n,m \ge1, the space F(Rn×Zm)\mathcal{F}(\mathbb{R}^n \times\mathbb{Z}^m) is isomorphic to the direct sum of F(Rn)\mathcal{F}(\mathbb{R}^n) and F(Zn+m)\mathcal{F}(\mathbb{Z}^{n+m}). Their proof uses the maximum norm; the preceding norm equivalence gives the Euclidean formulation used here. Throughout, R0\mathbb{R}^0 and Z0\mathbb{Z}^0 denote singletons.

Theorem B. Let n,m≥0n,m \ge0 be integers. The following conditions are equivalent:

  1. F(Rn×Zm)\mathcal{F}(\mathbb{R}^n \times\mathbb{Z}^m) is strongly weakly compactly generated;

  2. F(Rn×Zm)\mathcal{F}(\mathbb{R}^n \times\mathbb{Z}^m) has property (K);

  3. n≤1n \le1.

Moreover, if d≥2d \ge2 and m≥0m \ge0, then F(Rd)\mathcal{F}(\mathbb{R}^d) does not embed isomorphically into F(R×Zm)\mathcal{F}(\mathbb{R} \times\mathbb{Z}^m).

In particular, F(R×Z)≇F(R2)\mathcal{F}(\mathbb{R} \times\mathbb{Z}) \not\cong\mathcal{F}(\mathbb{R}^2). This answers [1 Question 5], also recorded in [5 Section 3.5] and [17 Problem 2]. Mason’s recent Dunford–Pettis theorem [17 Theorem 1 and Corollary 2] shows that both spaces have the Dunford–Pettis property, so that property cannot distinguish them. Property (K) does, and the SWCG conclusion yields the stronger nonembeddability result. In the original topological formulation of SWCG, Theorem B also says that the closed unit ball of Lip⁡0(Rn×Zm)\operatorname{Lip}_0(\mathbb{R}^n \times\mathbb{Z}^m) is metrisable in its Mackey topology precisely when n≤1n \le1.

An Eggleston-type product lemma gives a further geometric consequence.

Theorem C. Every subset E⊂RnE \subset\mathbb{R}^n whose closure has positive Lebesgue measure, where n≥2n \ge2, satisfies all the conclusions of Theorem A.

Naor and Schechtman [20] proved that the L1L_1-distortion of planar earthmover metrics on square grids tends to infinity, with a lower bound of order log⁡n\sqrt{\log n} for grids of side length nn. Their theorem implies that F(I2)\mathcal{F}(I^2) and F(R2)\mathcal{F}(\mathbb{R}^2) do not embed into L1L_1. This also implies Lip⁡0(I2)≇ℓ∞\operatorname{Lip}_0(I^2) \not\cong\ell_\infty: otherwise F(I2)\mathcal{F}(I^2) would embed into ℓ∞\ell_\infty and hence, by the measure-domination argument in Lemma 2.4, into a finite-measure L1L_1-space. Theorem A gives a direct qualitative proof of these consequences. Its additional scope includes arbitrary positive-measure sets, products I×KI \times K with null Cantor sets KK, and the example below, where square grids of uniformly bounded distortion are unavailable.

Theorem D. There is a compact planar set MM with dim⁡AM=1\dim_A M = 1 satisfying all the conclusions of Theorem A. For each fixed distortion bound, MM contains bi-Lipschitz copies of square grids of only bounded size, even when arbitrary rescaling is allowed. The space F(M)\mathcal{F}(M) has the Dunford–Pettis property and property (V∗V^*) and is weakly sequentially complete.

The Euclidean examples above combine failure of (K) with the Dunford–Pettis property, property (V∗V^*) and weak sequential completeness [16, 6, 17]. By contrast, complete purely 1-unrectifiable metric spaces have Schur Lipschitz-free spaces [4 Theorem C] and hence have (K); neither these Schur spaces nor our weakly sequentially complete examples contain c0c_0.

Preliminaries

For a pointed metric space (M,o)(M,o), let Lip⁡0(M)\operatorname{Lip}_0(M) be the Banach space of real Lipschitz functions vanishing at oo, with norm ∥f∥Lip⁡\|f\|_{\operatorname{Lip}}. Its canonical predual is the Lipschitz-free space

F(M)=span⁡‾{δp:p∈M}⊂Lip⁡0(M)∗,⟨f,δp⟩=f(p).\mathcal{F}(M)=\overline{\operatorname{span}}\{\delta_p:p\in M\}\subset\operatorname{Lip}_0(M)^*,\qquad\langle f,\delta_p\rangle=f(p).

Changing the base point gives canonically isometric spaces. McShane’s extension theorem [23 Theorem 1.33] identifies F(N)\mathcal{F}(N) isometrically with a closed subspace of F(M)\mathcal{F}(M) whenever N⊂MN\subset M contains the base point. Moreover, F(M)\mathcal{F}(M) is canonically isometric to F(M‾)\mathcal{F}(\overline{M}), where M‾\overline{M} is the metric completion. A uniformly bounded sequence in Lip⁡0(M)\operatorname{Lip}_0(M) is weak∗^*-null if it converges pointwise to zero, by density of the evaluation functionals.

For a Banach space XX, write BXB_X for its closed unit ball. The Mackey topology μ(X∗,X)\mu(X^*,X) on X∗X^* is the locally convex topology of uniform convergence on weakly compact subsets of XX. It is generated by the seminorms

pW(f)=sup⁡x∈W∣⟨f,x⟩∣,W⊂X weakly compact.p_W(f)=\sup_{x\in W}|\langle f,x\rangle|,\qquad W\subset X\text{ weakly compact}.

One may equivalently restrict to absolutely convex weakly compact sets, since the closed absolutely convex hull of a weakly compact set is weakly compact. Thus gk→0g_k\to0 in μ(X∗,X)\mu(X^*,X) means that pW(gk)→0p_W(g_k)\to0 for every such WW. The weak∗^* topology σ(X∗,X)\sigma(X^*,X) requires only pointwise convergence on XX.

A convex block subsequence of (fm)(f_m) has the form

gk=∑m∈Ekamfm,am≥0,∑m∈Ekam=1,max⁡Ek<min⁡Ek+1,(1)g_k=\sum_{m\in E_k}a_mf_m,\qquad a_m\ge0,\qquad\sum_{m\in E_k}a_m=1,\qquad\max E_k<\min E_{k+1}, \tag*{(1)}

where the Ek⊂NE_k\subset\mathbb{N} are finite and non-empty. The following standard consequence of Eberlein–Šmulian connects the Mackey formulation of (K) with the pairing formulation in [15]. We recall the proof for completeness; see also the quantitative version in [9 Lemma 3.1].

Lemma 2.1. A weak∗^*-null sequence (gk)(g_k) in X∗X^* converges to zero in μ(X∗,X)\mu(X^*,X) if and only if ⟨gk,xk⟩→0\langle g_k,x_k\rangle\to0 for every weakly null sequence (xk)(x_k) in XX.

Proof. One implication follows by applying uniform convergence to the weakly compact set {0,x1,x2,…}\{0,x_1,x_2,\ldots\}. Conversely, failure of uniform convergence on a weakly compact set WW gives ε>0\varepsilon>0, indices kjk_j and points xj∈Wx_j\in W with ∣⟨gkj,xj⟩∣≥ε|\langle g_{k_j},x_j\rangle|\ge\varepsilon. By Eberlein–Šmulian, pass to a subsequence such that xj→xx_j\to x weakly. Set zkj=xj−xz_{k_j}=x_j-x and zk=0z_k=0 at all other indices. Then (zk)(z_k) is weakly null, whereas weak∗^* convergence gives ∣⟨gkj,zkj⟩∣≥ε/2|\langle g_{k_j},z_{k_j}\rangle|\ge\varepsilon/2 eventually. □\square

The proof of Theorem A uses only the forward implication. The converse reconciles the two formulations of property (K).

Definition 2.2. A Banach space YY is strongly weakly compactly generated (SWCG) if the relative Mackey topology μ(Y∗,Y)\mu(Y^*,Y) on BY∗B_{Y^*} is metrisable.

This is the original definition of Schlüchtermann and Wheeler. By [22 Theorem 2.1], it is equivalent to the existence of a weakly compact absolutely convex set H⊂YH\subset Y such that

∀W⊂Y weakly compact∀ε>0∃n∈N:W⊂nH+εBY.(2)\forall W\subset Y\text{ weakly compact}\quad\forall\varepsilon>0\quad\exists n\in\mathbb{N}:\quad W\subset nH+\varepsilon B_Y. \tag*{(2)}

Here nH={nh:h∈H}nH=\{nh:h\in H\}, and HH is said to strongly generate YY. We use this characterisation below. Equivalently, there is a sequence (Aj)(A_j) of weakly compact absolutely convex subsets of YY such that, for every weakly compact W⊂YW\subset Y and every ε>0\varepsilon>0, some AjA_j satisfies W⊂Aj+εBYW \subset A_j + \varepsilon B_Y. This expresses the weakly compact density condition: a countable family approximates every weakly compact set to arbitrary norm accuracy. The three equivalent formulations are also recorded in [13 Theorem 10]; for the density-condition viewpoint, see [12 Section 6.7, pp. 177–183].

The result below for separable Schur spaces is due to Schlüchtermann and Wheeler [22]; see also Mercourakis and Stamati [18 Example 1.3(ii)]. We include its short proof and the elementary permanence properties needed for Theorem B.

Lemma 2.3. Every separable Schur space is SWCG. Finite direct sums of SWCG spaces are SWCG, and the property is invariant under isomorphisms.

Proof. Let YY be a non-zero separable Schur space and let (yj)(y_j) be dense in its unit sphere. The closed absolutely convex hull HH of {2−jyj:j∈N}\{2^{-j}y_j:j\in\mathbb{N}\} is norm compact and has dense linear span. Since HH is absolutely convex, ⋃k≥1kH\bigcup_{k\geq1} kH is norm dense in YY. Every weakly compact set W⊂YW\subset Y is norm compact, by the Schur property and Eberlein–Šmulian. A finite ε/2\varepsilon/2-net in WW, followed by approximation of its points in ⋃kkH\bigcup_k kH, gives W⊂kH+εBYW\subset kH+\varepsilon B_Y for some kk. The zero space is immediate. For a finite direct sum with the maximum norm, take the product of weakly compact absolutely convex generating sets and apply the inclusions in (2) to the coordinate projections of WW. Finally, an isomorphism transports a generating set and changes only the required approximation tolerance. □

SWCG itself does not pass to closed subspaces: Mercourakis and Stamati [18 Corollary 3.10] construct a non-SWCG closed subspace of L1[0,1]L_1[0,1]. Thus the nonembedding conclusion in Theorem A uses the stronger fact that every subspace of an SWCG space has (K), due to Avilés and Rodríguez [7 Corollary 2.3]. Together with the finite-measure L1L_1 case of [22], this also gives the following observation for arbitrary measures and dual isomorphisms.

Lemma 2.4. Every separable closed subspace of any L1L_1-space is isomorphic to a subspace of a finite-measure L1L_1-space, and hence has (K). If a separable Banach space XX satisfies X∗≅ℓ∞X^* \cong\ell_\infty, then XX has (K).

Proof. For a dense sequence (uj)(u_j) in a separable subspace of L1(μ)L_1(\mu), put w=∑j≥12−j∣uj∣/(1+∥uj∥1)w=\sum_{j\geq1}2^{-j}|u_j|/(1+\lVert u_j\rVert_1) and dν=w dμd\nu=w\,d\mu. Every element of that subspace vanishes off {w>0}\{w>0\}, and u↦u/wu\mapsto u/w, defined as zero when w=0w=0, is an isometry into L1(ν)L_1(\nu), where ν\nu is finite.

For the second part, identify XX, up to isomorphism, with a separable subspace YY of X∗∗≅ℓ∞∗=M(βN)X^{**}\cong\ell_\infty^*=M(\beta\mathbb{N}). For a dense sequence (νj)(\nu_j) in YY, the finite positive measure ν=∑j≥12−j∣νj∣/(1+∥νj∥)\nu=\sum_{j\geq1}2^{-j}|\nu_j|/(1+\lVert\nu_j\rVert) dominates every νj\nu_j. Absolute continuity is preserved under variation-norm limits, so Radon–Nikodým derivatives embed YY isometrically into L1(ν)L_1(\nu). The subspace theorem for (K) completes the proof. □

The derivative map identifies Lip⁡0(I)\operatorname{Lip}_0(I) isometrically with L∞(I)L_\infty(I); Pełczyński’s theorem [21] gives L∞(I)≅ℓ∞L_\infty(I)\cong\ell_\infty. We shall also use that Schur spaces have (K): their weakly compact sets are norm compact, and bounded weak∗^*-null sequences converge uniformly on norm-compact sets. Recall also that the Dunford–Pettis property is equivalent to ⟨xj∗,xj⟩→0\langle x_j^*,x_j\rangle\to0 whenever both (xj)⊂X(x_j)\subset X and (xj∗)⊂X∗(x_j^*)\subset X^* are weakly null. In contrast, the dual sequences in the definition of (K) are only assumed to be weak∗^*-null.

The product construction

Passing to a compact subset and rescaling, it suffices to consider compact C⊂IC\subset I with min⁡C=0\min C=0, max⁡C=1\max C=1 and c=∣C∣>0c=|C|>0. When normalising CC, rescale the metric on KK by the same factor; this rescaling leaves the distortion of the embedding unchanged. Let

rj(x)=(−1)⌊2jx⌋(0≤x<1),Hj(x)=∫0x1C(s)rj(s) ds.r_j(x)=(-1)^{\lfloor2^j x\rfloor}\quad(0\le x<1),\qquad H_j(x)=\int_0^x \mathbf{1}_C(s)r_j(s)\,\mathrm{d}s.

The Rademacher functions are orthonormal in L2(I)L_2(I). By Bessel’s inequality, applied to 1C∩[0,x]\mathbf{1}_{C\cap[0,x]}, we have Hj(x)→0H_j(x)\to0 for every xx, and their common Lipschitz bound 1 implies

∥Hj∥∞⟶0.(3)\lVert H_j\rVert_\infty\longrightarrow0. \tag*{(3)}

Lemma 3.1. There is a weakly null sequence (νj)(\nu_j) in the unit sphere of F(C)\mathcal{F}(C) such that ⟨Hj∣C,νj⟩=1\langle H_j|_C,\nu_j\rangle=1 for all jj.

Proof. We first describe the affine extension used in [10 Theorem 3.2]. Since CC is compact and contains 0 and 1, each component of I∖CI\setminus C is an open interval (a,b)(a,b) with a,b∈Ca,b\in C. For h∈Lip⁡0(C)h\in\operatorname{Lip}_0(C), define Λh=h\Lambda h=h on CC and

(Λh)(x)=b−xb−ah(a)+x−ab−ah(b)(a<x<b).(\Lambda h)(x)=\frac{b-x}{b-a}h(a)+\frac{x-a}{b-a}h(b)\qquad(a<x<b).

This defines a linear operator Λ:Lip⁡0(C)→Lip⁡0(I)\Lambda:\operatorname{Lip}_0(C)\to\operatorname{Lip}_0(I). On [a,b][a,b], the slope of Λh\Lambda h is (h(b)−h(a))/(b−a)(h(b)-h(a))/(b-a), whose modulus is at most ∥h∥Lip\lVert h\rVert_{\mathrm{Lip}}. If x<yx<y do not lie in the closure of one gap, let aa and bb be the first and last points of C∩[x,y]C\cap[x,y]. Applying the preceding estimate on [x,a][x,a] and [b,y][b,y], and the Lipschitz bound for hh on [a,b][a,b], gives

∣(Λh)(y)−(Λh)(x)∣≤∥h∥Lip((a−x)+(b−a)+(y−b))=∥h∥Lip(y−x).\left|(\Lambda h)(y)-(\Lambda h)(x)\right| \le\lVert h\rVert_{\mathrm{Lip}}\bigl((a-x)+(b-a)+(y-b)\bigr) =\lVert h\rVert_{\mathrm{Lip}}(y-x).

Since restriction to CC recovers hh, Λ\Lambda is an isometry. Its adjoint sends an evaluation at x∈Cx\in C to the same evaluation on CC, and for x∈(a,b)⊂I∖Cx\in(a,b)\subset I\setminus C it satisfies

Λ∗δx=b−xb−aδa+x−ab−aδb,\Lambda^*\delta_x=\frac{b-x}{b-a}\delta_a+\frac{x-a}{b-a}\delta_b,

where the evaluations on the right belong to F(C)\mathcal{F}(C). Thus Λ∗\Lambda^* maps the linear span of the evaluations on II into F(C)\mathcal{F}(C) and, by continuity, restricts to a contraction P:F(I)→F(C)P:\mathcal{F}(I)\to\mathcal{F}(C). The identity ⟨h,Pμ⟩=⟨Λh,μ⟩\langle h,P\mu\rangle=\langle\Lambda h,\mu\rangle for h∈Lip⁡0(C)h\in\operatorname{Lip}_0(C) and μ∈F(I)\mu\in\mathcal{F}(I) gives P∗=ΛP^*=\Lambda.

For H∈Lip⁡0(I)H\in\operatorname{Lip}_0(I), write H′H' for its almost-everywhere derivative. Such a function is absolutely continuous, H(x)=∫0xH′(s) dsH(x)=\int_0^x H'(s)\,\mathrm{d}s, and ∥H′∥∞=∥H∥Lip\lVert H'\rVert_\infty=\lVert H\rVert_{\mathrm{Lip}}. The interval representation in [10 Corollary 3.3] can therefore be described directly by

⟨H,Ju⟩=∫01H′(x)u(x) dx(H∈Lip⁡0(I), u∈L1(I)).\langle H,Ju\rangle=\int_0^1 H'(x)u(x)\,\mathrm{d}x \qquad(H\in\operatorname{Lip}_0(I),\ u\in L_1(I)).

Indeed, J1(a,b]=δb−δaJ\mathbf{1}_{(a,b]}=\delta_b-\delta_a whenever 0≤a<b≤10\le a<b\le1. Interval step functions are dense in L1(I)L_1(I), so the estimate ∥Ju∥≤∥u∥1\lVert Ju\rVert\le\lVert u\rVert_1 shows that Ju∈F(I)Ju\in\mathcal{F}(I) for every u∈L1(I)u\in L_1(I). Taking H(x)=∫0xsgn⁡u(s) dsH(x)=\int_0^x\operatorname{sgn}u(s)\,\mathrm{d}s gives the reverse inequality, hence J:L1(I)→F(I)J:L_1(I)\to\mathcal{F}(I) is an isometry. Its range is closed and contains every evaluation δx=J1(0,x]\delta_x=J\mathbf{1}_{(0,x]}, so it is onto.

Put νj=c−1PJ(1Crj)\nu_j=c^{-1}PJ(\mathbf{1}_C r_j). Since ∥1Crj∥1=c\lVert\mathbf{1}_C r_j\rVert_1=c, we have ∥νj∥≤1\lVert\nu_j\rVert\le1. For every h∈Lip⁡0(C)h\in\operatorname{Lip}_0(C),

⟨h,νj⟩=c−1∫Crj(x)(Λh)′(x) dx⟶0\langle h,\nu_j\rangle=c^{-1}\int_C r_j(x)(\Lambda h)'(x)\,\mathrm{d}x\longrightarrow0

by Bessel’s inequality, since 1C(Λh)′∈L2(I)\mathbf{1}_C(\Lambda h)'\in L_2(I). Thus (νj)(\nu_j) is weakly null. The function HjH_j is constant on every gap of CC, so Λ(Hj∣C)=Hj\Lambda(H_j|_C)=H_j. Consequently

⟨Hj∣C,νj⟩=c−1∫Crj(x)2 dx=1.\langle H_j|_C,\nu_j\rangle=c^{-1}\int_C r_j(x)^2\,\mathrm{d}x=1.

As ∥Hj∣C∥Lip≤1\lVert H_j|C\rVert_{\mathrm{Lip}} \le1, this also gives ∥νj∥=1\lVert\nu_j\rVert= 1.

Let KK be a Cantor metric space. Fix a homeomorphism S↦tSS \mapsto t_S from the subsets of N\mathbb{N}, identified with {0,1}N\{0,1\}^{\mathbb{N}}, onto KK. For a finite binary word σ\sigma, define the compact cylinder

Kσ={tS:1S∣{1,…,∣σ∣}=σ}.K_\sigma=\{t_S: \mathbf{1}_{S|_{\{1,\ldots,|\sigma|\}}}=\sigma\}.

For b≥1b \ge1, put

db=min⁡∣σ∣=∣τ∣=bσ≠τdist⁡(Kσ,Kτ)>0,εb=min⁡(2−b,d1/2,…,db/2).d_b=\min_{\substack{|\sigma|=|\tau|=b\\\sigma\ne\tau}}\operatorname{dist}(K_\sigma,K_\tau)>0,\qquad\varepsilon_b=\min(2^{-b},d_1/2,\ldots,d_b/2).

The sequence (εb)(\varepsilon_b) decreases to zero. By (3), choose strictly increasing indices jbj_b with ∥Hjb∥∞≤εb\lVert H_{j_b}\rVert_\infty\le\varepsilon_b. For a fixed mm and a subset S⊂NS\subset\mathbb{N}, call the elements of S∩{m,m+1,…}S\cap\{m,m+1,\ldots\} the selected indices. Define on C×KC\times K

fm(x,tS)={Hjb(x),b=min⁡(S∩{m,m+1,…}) exists,0,S∩{m,m+1,…}=∅.(4)f_m(x,t_S)= \begin{cases} H_{j_b}(x), & b=\min(S\cap\{m,m+1,\ldots\})\text{ exists},\\ 0, & S\cap\{m,m+1,\ldots\}=\varnothing. \end{cases} \tag*{(4)}

These functions vanish on {0}×K\{0\}\times K, satisfy ∥fm∥∞≤εm\lVert f_m\rVert_\infty\le\varepsilon_m, and are 1-Lipschitz in the first coordinate. To check the second coordinate, suppose that S,US,U first differ at bb. If b≥mb\ge m and a selected index lies in [m,b)[m,b), the first selected indices agree and the values in (4) coincide. Otherwise all selected indices are at least bb; this also holds when b<mb<m, since they are then at least m>bm>b. The difference is therefore at most 2εb≤db≤dK(tS,tU)2\varepsilon_b\le d_b\le d_K(t_S,t_U). Going through (x′,t)(x',t) now gives the explicit estimate

∣fm(x,t)−fm(x′,u)∣≤∣x−x′∣+dK(t,u)≤2d2((x,t),(x′,u)).(5)|f_m(x,t)-f_m(x',u)|\le|x-x'|+d_K(t,u)\le\sqrt{2}d_2((x,t),(x',u)). \tag*{(5)}

Proof of Theorem A. Reduce CC to the compact normalised case above and KK to a Cantor subspace. Let Φ:C×K→M\Phi:C\times K\to M be a bi-Lipschitz embedding, and choose the base point o=Φ(0,t∅)o=\Phi(0,t_{\varnothing}). Write dMd_M for the metric on MM, put Q=Φ(C×K)Q=\Phi(C\times K), and define gm=fm∘Φ−1g_m=f_m\circ\Phi^{-1} on QQ. By (5), these functions have a common Lipschitz bound L=2∥Φ−1∥LipL=\sqrt{2}\lVert\Phi^{-1}\rVert_{\mathrm{Lip}}. McShane’s extension theorem [23 Theorem 1.33] gives the extensions

F~m(p)=inf⁡q∈Q(gm(q)+LdM(p,q)),p∈M.\widetilde{F}_m(p)=\inf_{q\in Q}\bigl(g_m(q)+L d_M(p,q)\bigr),\qquad p\in M.

Here LdM(p,q)L d_M(p,q) is the distance between pp and qq multiplied by the constant LL. The triangle inequality gives F~m(p)≤F~m(p′)+LdM(p,p′)\widetilde{F}_m(p)\le\widetilde{F}_m(p')+L d_M(p,p'); interchanging pp and p′p' proves the Lipschitz bound LL. For p∈Qp\in Q, the Lipschitz bound on gmg_m gives gm(p)≤gm(q)+LdM(p,q)g_m(p)\le g_m(q)+L d_M(p,q) for every q∈Qq\in Q, and taking q=pq=p shows that F~m(p)=gm(p)\widetilde{F}_m(p)=g_m(p).

To retain the uniform bound εm\varepsilon_m, define

Fm(p)=max⁡{−εm,min⁡{εm,F~m(p)}}.F_m(p)=\max\{-\varepsilon_m,\min\{\varepsilon_m,\widetilde{F}_m(p)\}\}.

This replaces values above εm\varepsilon_m by εm\varepsilon_m and values below −εm-\varepsilon_m by −εm-\varepsilon_m. The scalar map s↦max⁡{−εm,min⁡{εm,s}}s\mapsto\max\{-\varepsilon_m,\min\{\varepsilon_m,s\}\} is 1-Lipschitz and fixes every point of [−εm,εm][-\varepsilon_m,\varepsilon_m]. Since ∣gm∣≤εm|g_m|\le\varepsilon_m on QQ, it follows that FmF_m still extends gmg_m, vanishes at oo, and satisfies ∥Fm∥Lip≤L\lVert F_m\rVert_{\mathrm{Lip}}\le L and ∥Fm∥∞≤εm\lVert F_m\rVert_\infty\le\varepsilon_m. In particular, (Fm)(F_m) is weak*-null in Lip⁡0(M)\operatorname{Lip}_0(M).

For each fixed t∈Kt\in K, the bounded linear map

Tt:F(C)⟶F(M),Ttδx=δΦ(x,t)−δΦ(0,t)T_t:\mathcal{F}(C)\longrightarrow\mathcal{F}(M),\qquad T_t\delta_x=\delta_{\Phi(x,t)}-\delta_{\Phi(0,t)}

has ∥Tt∥≤∥Φ∥Lip\lVert T_t\rVert\le\lVert\Phi\rVert_{\mathrm{Lip}} by the universal linearisation property of Lipschitz-free spaces [23 Theorem 3.6], and sends (νj)(\nu_j) to a weakly null sequence. Let (Gk)(G_k) be any convex block subsequence of (Fm)(F_m), with notation as in (1). Put bk=max⁡Ekb_k=\max E_k and t=t{bk:k≥1}t=t_{\{b_k:k\geq1\}}. For every m∈Ekm\in E_k, the least selected index at least mm is bkb_k. Consequently

Gk(Φ(x,t))=Hjbk(x),⟨Gk,Ttνjbk⟩=1.G_k(\Phi(x,t))=H_{j_{b_k}}(x),\qquad\langle G_k,T_t\nu_{j_{b_k}}\rangle=1.

Lemma 2.1 proves that F(M)\mathcal{F}(M) fails (K). Notice that the same fibre is used for the whole block sequence.

The subspace theorem from [7] excludes an embedding into an SWCG space. To exclude an embedding into an arbitrary L1L_1-space, restrict it to the separable subspace F(Q)\mathcal{F}(Q). Applying the construction with ambient space QQ shows that F(Q)\mathcal{F}(Q) fails (K), contradicting Lemma 2.4. Finally, if MM is separable then so is F(M)\mathcal{F}(M), and the same lemma gives Lip⁡0(M)≇ℓ∞\operatorname{Lip}_0(M)\not\cong\ell_\infty.

The construction also gives a quantitative estimate. Following [9 Section 3], for a bounded sequence (gk)⊂X∗(g_k)\subset X^* put

β((gk))=sup⁡(xk)⊂BXxk→0 weaklylim sup⁡k∣⟨gk,xk⟩∣.\beta((g_k))=\sup_{\substack{(x_k)\subset B_X\\x_k\to0\ \mathrm{weakly}}}\limsup_k|\langle g_k,x_k\rangle|.

The quantity K2(X)K_2(X) is the supremum, over weak*-null sequences in BX∗B_{X^*}, of the infimum of β\beta over their convex block subsequences. If Φ\Phi is as in the proof above and D=∥Φ∥Lip⁡∥Φ−1∥Lip⁡D=\|\Phi\|_{\operatorname{Lip}}\|\Phi^{-1}\|_{\operatorname{Lip}}, then

K2(F(M))≥D−1.(6)K_2(\mathcal{F}(M))\geq D^{-1}. \tag*{(6)}

Indeed, for any η>0\eta>0, choose the indices jbj_b so that ∥Hjb∥∞≤ηεb\|H_{j_b}\|_\infty\leq\eta\varepsilon_b. The functions in (4) are then η\eta-Lipschitz in the second coordinate and have Lipschitz norm at most 1+η2\sqrt{1+\eta^2}. Run the extension construction with Lη=1+η2∥Φ−1∥Lip⁡L_\eta=\sqrt{1+\eta^2}\|\Phi^{-1}\|_{\operatorname{Lip}} and truncate the extensions to [−ηεm,ηεm][-\eta\varepsilon_m,\eta\varepsilon_m]. For every convex block sequence (Gk)(G_k) of these extensions, the weakly null sequence

xk=Ttνjbk∥Φ∥Lip⁡∈BF(M)x_k=\frac{T_t\nu_{j_{b_k}}}{\|\Phi\|_{\operatorname{Lip}}}\in B_{\mathcal{F}(M)}

satisfies

⟨GkLη,xk⟩=11+η2D.\left\langle\frac{G_k}{L_\eta},x_k\right\rangle=\frac{1}{\sqrt{1+\eta^2}D}.

Letting η↓0\eta\downarrow0 gives (6). Since K2(X)≤1K_2(X)\leq1, we obtain K2(F(M))=1K_2(\mathcal{F}(M))=1 whenever the product embeds isometrically.

This proof also explains the significance of positive horizontal measure. If a non-empty compact set C⊂IC\subset I has Lebesgue measure zero, then 1Crj=0\mathbf{1}_C r_j=0 in L1(I)L_1(I) and HjH_j is identically zero. Moreover, F(C)\mathcal{F}(C) has the Schur property: if CC is infinite, it is linearly isometric to ℓ1\ell_1 by [10 Corollary 3.4], whereas for finite CC it is finite-dimensional. Thus F(C)\mathcal{F}(C) contains no normalised weakly null sequence. This explains why the fibre argument requires CC to have positive measure; it does not show that this condition is necessary for F(C×K)\mathcal{F}(C\times K) to fail (K).

Proof of Theorem B. Each Zk\mathbb{Z}^k is countable and uniformly discrete, so F(Zk)\mathcal{F}(\mathbb{Z}^k) is a separable Schur space by [14 Proposition 4.4]; it is therefore SWCG by Lemma 2.3. This settles the case n=0n=0, including the zero space if m=0m=0. For n=1n=1 and m≥1m\geq1, [5 Proposition 3.14] gives

F(R×Zm)≅F(R)⊕F(Zm+1)≅L1(R)⊕F(Zm+1),\mathcal{F}(\mathbb{R}\times\mathbb{Z}^m)\cong\mathcal{F}(\mathbb{R})\oplus\mathcal{F}(\mathbb{Z}^{m+1})\cong L_1(\mathbb{R})\oplus\mathcal{F}(\mathbb{Z}^{m+1}),

where the second isomorphism uses [10 Corollary 3.3]. The first summand is isomorphic to L1[0,1]L_1[0,1] and hence is SWCG; Lemma 2.3 applies again. The case n=1,m=0n=1,m=0 is the same L1L_1 observation. Every SWCG space has (K) by [7]. If n≥2n\geq2, then the underlying space contains an isometric copy of I2I^2, so Theorem A gives failure of (K). Finally, F(Rd)\mathcal{F}(\mathbb{R}^d) embeds into no SWCG space when d≥2d\geq2, which proves the final part of the theorem.

Positive-measure Euclidean sets

We include the following Eggleston-type argument for completeness; see [19] for related product theorems and their history.

Lemma 4.1. If E⊂R×RdE \subset\mathbb{R} \times\mathbb{R}^{d}, d≥1d \ge1, is Lebesgue measurable and has positive measure, then EE contains C×KC \times K, where C⊂RC \subset\mathbb{R} is compact with positive measure and K⊂RdK \subset\mathbb{R}^{d} is a Cantor set.

Proof. By inner regularity, replace EE by a compact subset of positive measure. For y∈Rdy \in\mathbb{R}^{d}, set Ey={x:(x,y)∈E}E_y = \{x : (x,y) \in E\} and Ψ(y)=1Ey∈L1(R)\Psi(y) = 1_{E_y} \in L_1(\mathbb{R}). The map Ψ\Psi is measurable: its distances to a countable dense family in L1(R)L_1(\mathbb{R}) are measurable by Fubini. Fubini and Lusin give a compact parameter set P0P_0 of positive measure on which Ψ\Psi is continuous and every EyE_y has positive measure. Replace P0P_0 by the support of Lebesgue measure restricted to P0P_0. The resulting compact set PP has no isolated points and retains both properties.

Choose y∅∈Py_{\varnothing} \in P and let a=∣Ey∅∣>0a = |E_{y_{\varnothing}}| > 0. By continuity and the absence of isolated points, choose inductively ys∈Py_s \in P and relatively open neighbourhoods UsU_s for finite binary words ss, with ys∈Usy_s \in U_s, nested closures, disjoint sibling closures, diameters tending uniformly to zero, and

∥Ψ(ysi)−Ψ(ys)∥1<a2−2∣s∣−4(i=0,1).\lVert\Psi(y_{si})-\Psi(y_s)\rVert_1 < a2^{-2|s|-4}\qquad(i=0,1).

Here and below closures are taken in PP. Then

C=⋂sEys,K=⋂j≥0⋃∣s∣=jUs‾C=\bigcap_s E_{y_s},\qquad K=\bigcap_{j\ge0}\bigcup_{|s|=j}\overline{U_s}

are compact, and the nested construction makes KK a Cantor set. Every point lost from the root fibre is lost at some edge of a finite branch, whence

∣C∣≥a−∑s,i∣Eys∖Eysi∣≥a−∑j≥02j+1a2−2j−4=3a/4>0.|C|\ge a-\sum_{s,i}|E_{y_s}\setminus E_{y_{si}}|\ge a-\sum_{j\ge0}2^{j+1}a2^{-2j-4}=3a/4>0.

For y∈Ky \in K, the points ysy_s along its branch converge to yy. Closedness of EE then gives C×{y}⊂EC \times\{y\} \subset E. □

Proof of Theorem C. Apply Lemma 4.1 to E‾\overline{E}, with d=n−1d=n-1, and then Theorem A. Since F(E)=F(E‾)\mathcal{F}(E)=\mathcal{F}(\overline{E}) canonically, all the conclusions follow. □

Aliaga [1 Theorem 3.7 and Corollary 3.8] proves Lip⁡0(E)≅Lip⁡0(Rn)\operatorname{Lip}_0(E) \cong\operatorname{Lip}_0(\mathbb{R}^{n}) whenever E⊂RnE \subset\mathbb{R}^{n} is non-porous, in particular whenever it has positive measure. That dual isomorphism alone does not identify the weak* topologies determined by the canonical preduals. Theorem C establishes failure of (K) directly for those preduals. Aliaga’s subsequent theorem [2 Theorem 1] gives a complemented copy of F(Zn)\mathcal{F}(\mathbb{Z}^{n}) in F(E)\mathcal{F}(E) whenever EE is non-porous. It does not yield failure of (K), since F(Zn)\mathcal{F}(\mathbb{Z}^{n}) is Schur. Indeed, the positive-measure hypothesis in Theorem C cannot be replaced by non-porosity: Zn\mathbb{Z}^{n} is non-porous in the all-scales sense of [1 Definition 2.1], but its Lipschitz-free space is SWCG. That definition requires a fixed λ>0\lambda>0 such that every ambient ball B(z,R)B(z,R), at every scale R>0R>0, contains a ball of radius λR\lambda R disjoint from the set. Every point of Rn\mathbb{R}^{n} is within n/2\sqrt{n}/2 of Zn\mathbb{Z}^{n}, so every ball of radius greater than n/2\sqrt{n}/2 meets Zn\mathbb{Z}^{n}. Taking λR>n/2\lambda R>\sqrt{n}/2 rules out the required hole. This is compatible with the porosity of Zn\mathbb{Z}^{n} at small scales.

Candido, Cúth and Doucha [8 Theorem 1.16] proved Lip⁡0(Zd)≅Lip⁡0(Rd)\operatorname{Lip}_0(\mathbb{Z}^{d}) \cong\operatorname{Lip}_0(\mathbb{R}^{d}) for every d≥1d\ge1. The non-isomorphism of the canonical preduals was already known: F(Zd)\mathcal{F}(\mathbb{Z}^{d}) is Schur, whereas F(Rd)\mathcal{F}(\mathbb{R}^{d}) contains a copy of L1L_{1} coming from a line. For d≥2d \ge2, the present argument also distinguishes these preduals by property (K).

An example of Assouad dimension one

For a metric space MM, its Assouad dimension is the infimum of the exponents ss for which there is As<∞A_s < \infty such that

Nr(B(p,R)∩M)≤As(R/r)s(p∈M, 0<r<R≤diam⁡M),N_r(B(p,R) \cap M) \le A_s(R/r)^s \qquad(p \in M,\ 0 < r < R \le\operatorname{diam} M),

where diam⁡M\operatorname{diam} M may be infinite and NrN_r is the least number of balls of radius rr needed to cover the indicated set.

Proof of Theorem D. Starting with [0,1][0,1], at stage j≥1j \ge1 retain the two endpoint subintervals of relative length aj=2−j−2a_j = 2^{-j-2} in each remaining interval. Let K∗K_\ast be the resulting Cantor set. The intervals at level jj have length Lj=∏i=1jai=2−j(j+5)/2L_j = \prod_{i=1}^{j} a_i = 2^{-j(j+5)/2}, with L0=1L_0 = 1.

We verify that dim⁡AK∗=0\dim_A K_\ast= 0. Fix ε>0\varepsilon> 0 and choose JJ so that ajε≤1/2a_j^\varepsilon\le1/2 for j≥Jj \ge J. For 0<r<R<10 < r < R < 1, choose k,nk,n with Lk≤R<Lk−1L_k \le R < L_{k-1} and Ln≤r<Ln−1L_n \le r < L_{n-1}. Then n≥kn \ge k. Distinct level-(k−1)(k-1) intervals are separated by gaps of length at least 6Lk−1>2R6L_{k-1} > 2R; for k=1k=1 there is just one such interval. Thus a ball of radius RR meets at most one, and Nr(B(p,R)∩K∗)≤2n−k+1N_r(B(p,R) \cap K_\ast) \le2^{n-k+1}. If n≤k+1n \le k+1, this is at most 4. Otherwise,

2n−k−1≤2J(∏j=k+1n−1aj−1)ε=2J(LkLn−1)ε≤2J(R/r)ε.2^{n-k-1} \le2^J\left(\prod_{j=k+1}^{n-1} a_j^{-1}\right)^\varepsilon= 2^J\left(\frac{L_k}{L_{n-1}}\right)^\varepsilon\le2^J(R/r)^\varepsilon.

The same global estimate treats R=1R=1, so dim⁡AK∗=0\dim_A K_\ast= 0. Product covers give dim⁡A(I×K∗)≤1\dim_A(I \times K_\ast) \le1, and the contained interval gives the reverse inequality. Set M=I×K∗M=I \times K_\ast and apply Theorem A.

Since MM is a compact subset of the plane, [16] gives (V∗)(V^\ast) and weak sequential completeness, while [17 Corollary 2] gives the Dunford–Pettis property.

Finally, suppose that f:{0,…,N}2→Mf:\{0,\ldots,N\}^2 \to M satisfies

λ∣p−q∣≤d(f(p),f(q))≤Dλ∣p−q∣(p,q∈{0,…,N}2).\lambda|p-q| \le d(f(p),f(q)) \le D\lambda|p-q| \qquad(p,q \in\{0,\ldots,N\}^2).

for some λ>0\lambda> 0 and fixed DD. Its (N+1)2(N+1)^2 image points are λ\lambda-separated and lie in a ball of radius 2DλN\sqrt{2}D\lambda N. The Assouad estimate with exponent 3/23/2 and r=λ/3r=\lambda/3 gives

(N+1)2≤A(32DN)3/2.(N+1)^2 \le A(3\sqrt{2}DN)^{3/2}.

If the displayed outer radius exceeds diam⁡M\operatorname{diam} M, use diam⁡M\operatorname{diam} M instead. The constant AA depends only on MM, so NN is bounded for each fixed DD. □

The dimension in Theorem D is minimal even among complete metric spaces. If dim⁡AM<1\dim_A M < 1, every bounded ball in MM has zero H1\mathcal{H}^1-measure, and a countable covering by such balls gives H1(M)=0\mathcal{H}^1(M)=0. Thus MM is purely 1-unrectifiable, and [4 Theorem C] gives the Schur property and (K).

For context, Kochanek and Pernecká [16] establish (V∗)(V^\ast) and weak sequential completeness for Lipschitz-free spaces over compact subsets of superreflexive spaces. Aliaga, Pernecká and Quero [6 Theorem C] prove (V∗)(V^\ast) over Hilbert spaces; as this property passes to closed subspaces, it holds for all our Euclidean examples. More generally, Jung, Petitjean, Procházka and Quilis [11 Proposition 6.1(ii)] obtain (V∗)(V^\ast) for metric spaces of finite Nagata dimension, including doubling spaces. Mason’s theorem [17 Corollary 2] gives the Dunford–Pettis property for every subset of a finite-dimensional Euclidean space. The example above therefore has all three properties despite failing (K).

Further questions

Let Δ\Delta be the middle-third Cantor set. Both I×ΔI \times\Delta and the product in Theorem D are porous in the plane. Indeed, all retention ratios are at most 1/31/3. For a point of either Cantor set and 0<r<40 < r < 4, the first level interval of length at most r/4r/4 has a parent with a middle gap longer than r/12r/12, at distance at most r/4r/4 from the point. This gives a complementary planar ball of radius r/48r/48 inside the ball of radius rr centred at the corresponding product point. Larger scales follow from boundedness. For an arbitrary ambient ball B(z,R)B(z, R), either B(z,R/2)B(z, R/2) misses the product or it contains a product point to which this construction applies with radius R/2R/2. Thus one may take porosity constant 1/961/96.

Porosity, rather than measure zero alone, places these products outside Aliaga’s non-porosity theorem. We know that Lip⁡0(I×Δ)≇ℓ∞\operatorname{Lip}_0(I \times\Delta) \not\cong\ell_\infty, but the argument does not decide whether Lip⁡0(I×Δ)≅Lip⁡0(I2)\operatorname{Lip}_0(I \times\Delta) \cong\operatorname{Lip}_0(I^2). A negative answer would disprove the line-or-plane dichotomy in [1 Question 3]; a positive answer would supply a porous example for [1 Question 4]. The recent theorem of Aliaga, Cúth and Vico [3 Theorem 1.1] makes every Lipschitz-free space the strongly unique isometric predual of its Lipschitz space. This does not require arbitrary Banach space isomorphisms of Lipschitz spaces to preserve their canonical weak* topologies, and therefore does not settle the question above. The example Z2\mathbb{Z}^2 versus R2\mathbb{R}^2 already shows that such an inference would fail.

Question 6.1. If M⊂R2M \subset\mathbb{R}^2 is compact and F(M)\mathcal{F}(M) fails (K), must MM contain a bi-Lipschitz copy of C×KC \times K as in Theorem A?

Compactness is a substantive restriction here: a countable dense subset of the square has the same Lipschitz-free space as the square, but cannot contain such an uncountable product.

Question 6.2. Can the construction give explicit lower bounds for the L1L_1-distortion of finite-dimensional subspaces of F(I×K)\mathcal{F}(I \times K) in terms of the separation scales of KK?

The estimate (6) quantifies failure of (K), but does not by itself give finite-dimensional L1L_1-distortion bounds. In particular, it does not recover the grid estimates of [20].

Use of artificial intelligence

This project originated in 2019. ChatGPT (OpenAI) was subsequently used to assess whether our preliminary results could address more recent problems, notably Aliaga’s question concerning the isomorphism of F(R×Z)\mathcal{F}(\mathbb{R} \times\mathbb{Z}) and F(R2)\mathcal{F}(\mathbb{R}^2) [1 Question 5], also recorded in [17 Problem 2], and his questions about the isomorphism types of Lipschitz spaces over planar sets and the rôle of porosity [1 Questions 3 and 4]. It also assisted with literature searches and the revision of the exposition. We retain responsibility for the mathematical content and references. (T. Kania) MATHEMATICAL INSTITUTE, CZECH ACADEMY OF SCIENCES, ŽITNÁ 25, 115 67 PRAHA 1, CZECH REPUBLIC AND INSTITUTE OF MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTER SCIENCE, JAGIELLONIAN UNIVERSITY, ŁOJASIEWICZA 6, 30-348 KRAKÓW, POLAND

Email address: [email protected], [email protected]

(J. Kąkol) DEPARTMENT OF FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS, FACULTY OF MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTER SCIENCE, ADAM MICKIEWICZ UNIVERSITY, UNIWERSYTETU POZNAŃSKIEGO 4, 61-614 POZNAŃ, POLAND

Email address: [email protected]

References

  1. [1]R. J. Aliaga, Lipschitz spaces over non-porous sets, J. Funct. Anal. 290 (2026), no. 11, Paper No. 111439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfa.2026.111439.
  2. [2]R. J. Aliaga, Lipschitz-free spaces over non-porous subsets of ℝⁿ, preprint (2026), arXiv:2607.29655. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.29655.
  3. [3]R. J. Aliaga, M. Ćuth and F. Vico, Lipschitz-free spaces are strongly unique preduals, preprint (2026), arXiv:2609.24392. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.24392.
  4. [4]R. J. Aliaga, C. Gartland, C. Petitjean and A. Procházka, Purely 1-unrectifiable metric spaces and locally flat Lipschitz functions, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 375 (2022), no. 5, 3529–3567. https://doi.org/10.1090/tran/8591.
  5. [5]R. J. Aliaga and R. Medina, Lipschitz extension and Lipschitz-free spaces over nets in normed spaces, preprint (2026), arXiv:2601.03131. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2601.03131.
  6. [6]R. J. Aliaga, E. Pernecká and A. Quero, Pełczyński’s property (V*) in Lipschitz-free spaces, Results Math. 80 (2025), Paper No. 197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00025-025-02510-6.
  7. [7]A. Avilés and J. Rodríguez, Convex combinations of weak*-convergent sequences and the Mackey topology, Mediterr. J. Math. 13 (2016), no. 6, 4995–5007. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00009-016-0788-3.
  8. [8]L. Candido, M. Ćuth and M. Doucha, Isomorphisms between spaces of Lipschitz functions, J. Funct. Anal. 277 (2019), no. 8, 2697–2727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfa.2019.02.003.
  9. [9]D. Chen, T. Kania and Y. Yuan, Quantifying properties (K) and (μs), Math. Nachr. 296 (2023), no. 3, 996–1012. https://doi.org/10.1002/mana.202100198.
  10. [10]A. Godard, Tree metrics and their Lipschitz-free spaces, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 138 (2010), no. 12, 4311–4320. https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9939-2010-10421-5.
  11. [11]M. Jung, C. Petitjean, A. Procházka and A. Quilis, Affine approximation in finite Nagata dimension and applications to Lipschitz-free spaces, preprint (2026), arXiv:2606.11723. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.11723.
  12. [12]J. Kakol, W. Kubiś, M. López-Pellicer and D. Sobota, Descriptive Topology in Selected Topics of Functional Analysis: Updated and Expanded, 2nd ed., Developments in Mathematics 24, Springer, Cham, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-76062-4.
  13. [13]J. Kakol and M. López-Pellicer, On realmcompact topological vector spaces, Rev. R. Acad. Cienc. Exactas Fís. Nat. Ser. A Mat. RACSAM 105 (2011), 39–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13398-011-0003-0.
  14. [14]N. J. Kalton, Spaces of Lipschitz and Hölder functions and their applications, Collect. Math. 55 (2004), no. 2, 171–217. https://kaltonmemorial.missouri.edu/assets/docs/collect2004.pdf.
  15. [15]N. J. Kalton and A. Pełczyński, Kernels of surjections from L1-spaces with an application to Sidon sets, Math. Ann. 309 (1997), no. 1, 135–158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002080050107.
  16. [16]T. Kochanek and E. Pernecká, Lipschitz-free spaces over compact subsets of superreflexive spaces are weakly sequentially complete, Bull. Lond. Math. Soc. 50 (2018), no. 4, 680–696. https://doi.org/10.1112/blms.12179.
  17. [17]F. Mason, The Dunford–Pettis property for Lipschitz-free spaces over Rn, preprint (2026), arXiv:2609.28842. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.28842.
  18. [18]S. Mercourakis and E. Stamati, A new class of weakly K-analytic Banach spaces, Comment. Math. Univ. Carolin. 47 (2006), no. 2, 291–312. https://dml.cz/handle/10338.dmlcz/119593.
  19. [19]M. Michalski, R. Ralowski and S. Żeberski, Around the Eggleston theorem, Arch. Math. Logic 65 (2026), 193–212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00153-025-00998-x.
  20. [20]A. Naor and G. Schechtman, Planar earthmover is not in L1, SIAM J. Comput. 37 (2007), no. 3, 804–826. https://doi.org/10.1137/05064206X.
  21. [21]A. Pełczyński, On the isomorphism of the spaces m and M, Bull. Acad. Polon. Sci. Sér. Sci. Math. Astr. Phys. 6 (1958), 695–696.
  22. [22]G. Schluchtermann and R. F. Wheeler, On strongly WCG Banach spaces, Math. Z. 199 (1988), no. 3, 387–398. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01159786.
  23. [23]N. Weaver, Lipschitz Algebras, 2nd ed., World Scientific, Hackensack, NJ, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1142/9911.

Paper details

vlnc:W_8kdh7f7x
v1 · latestHistory (1)

published · Fresh — added to the Hub within the last 30 days

added ·

Usage

views · 0

downloads · 2

A view counts once per browser per day, a download each time the PDF is requested.

CC BY 4.0

Original source

  • Mathematics

Not recorded for this paper · View statement →

Looking for related papers…
Contents