WorksPhysics and Astronomy
An exact unstable mode of self-similar Yang–Mills solutionsin 5+1 dimensions
Abstract
Self-similar solutions play an important role in the formation of singularities in the Yang–Mills equations. In five space dimensions, these equations admit infinitely many self-similar solutions with an increasing number of unstable modes. It was observed numerically that all excited profiles share the least unstable eigenvalue . We explain this remarkable spectral property by an elementary construction of the corresponding eigenfunction in terms of the profile.
Self-similar solutions
The spherically symmetric Yang–Mills equation in five space dimensions is
In terms of the similarity coordinates
where is the blowup time, equation (1) becomes
By definition, self-similar solutions are independent of : . The profile therefore satisfies
It was proved in [1] that there exist infinitely many smooth profiles , , where has exactly zeros on . Their endpoint expansions are
corresponding to the regular center and the similarity horizon, respectively. The fundamental profile, found explicitly in [1], is
Numerical computations in [2] indicated that the fundamental profile acts as a universal attractor for generic blowup, while the first excited profile governs the threshold between dispersion and blowup. The nonlinear asymptotic stability of under small equivariant perturbations was subsequently established in [3, 4].
Further numerical computations revealed a remarkable feature: the least unstable mode has the same eigenvalue for every excited profile [1], raising the question of its structural origin. In this note we resolve this little spectral puzzle by constructing the corresponding eigenfunction explicitly.
Linearized eigenvalue problem
Substituting into (2) and retaining terms linear in yields the eigenvalue equation
We seek eigenfunctions .
One such eigenfunction arises from differentiating the family of self-similar solutions with respect to :
which gives the gauge mode
It changes only the blowup time and is therefore not counted as a physical instability.
Self-adjoint formulation
For the spectral analysis and the exact-mode construction, it is convenient to introduce the reciprocal coordinate
In these variables, equation (3) becomes
At the similarity horizon and the center , the profiles have the endpoint expansions
The fundamental profile (6) becomes
Equation (7) is transformed into
Substituting
into (13) we obtain the self-adjoint Sturm–Liouville equation for :
Hereafter we refer to as the energy and to as the similarity eigenvalue. Although the transformation (14) relates the two differential equations for every , it identifies smooth similarity modes with square-integrable Sturm–Liouville eigenfunctions only when . To see this, consider a smooth mode with . Near , its transform satisfies
which is square integrable with weight precisely for . In that half-plane the second branch is not square integrable. At infinity, the regular branch corresponds to , whereas the singular branch corresponds to . Only the regular branch is square integrable with weight at infinity.
Thus, for , the similarity eigenmodes of (13) are in one-to-one correspondence with the eigenfunctions of the problem (15), allowing us to apply Sturm–Liouville theory. In particular, self-adjointness implies that is real and hence that is real. The analogous correspondence for wave maps is discussed in [5]. This equivalence does not apply to similarity modes with .
The gauge mode (8) becomes , which under (14) gives the zero-energy resonance (a bounded but not square-integrable solution)
From the proof of existence in [1], it follows that the profile and its derivative each have exactly interior zeros, which interlace. Therefore, the Sturm oscillation theorem implies that the spectral problem (15) has exactly negative energy levels. We order them as
where , , denote the negative energy levels for the profile . The corresponding eigenfunctions are denoted by . The associated unstable similarity eigenvalues are ordered as
with the corresponding eigenfunctions denoted by .
Numerical computations and asymptotic analysis in [1] indicated that the first eigenvalue in this sequence is independent of the profile:
Equivalently, every excited profile shares the same highest negative energy level , despite the dependence of the Sturm–Liouville operator on . We now explain this spectral feature by constructing the corresponding eigenfunction explicitly and proving that it occupies this position in the spectrum.
Construction of the exact mode
The same energy level for every excited profile suggests seeking a corresponding eigenfunction given by a universal first-order expression in the profile (here we suppress the index on ):
where and are independent of the particular profile . The gauge mode is the simplest example of such an expression. We now seek a nonzero energy for which an ansatz of this form solves the linearized equation for every profile.
Substituting the ansatz (18) into equation (15) and using the profile equation (9) and its derivative to eliminate and , we obtain
A sufficient condition for this expression to vanish for every profile is that the three coefficients vanish separately. Setting the coefficient of the cubic term to zero gives , so the ansatz (18) takes the total-derivative form , while the remaining coefficient equations reduce to
Taking to be constant recovers the gauge mode with . To find a nonconstant solution, we seek bounded at infinity and allow a simple pole at , where every profile vanishes. The simplest rational ansatz in with these properties is
Substituting this into (20) and clearing denominators gives
Since , the second equation yields , and then the first one gives . Normalizing , we obtain
Consequently, for every excited profile , , the first-order ansatz yields the mode, provisionally denoted by ,
which satisfies the eigenvalue equation (15) with , corresponding to .
It remains to verify the behavior of at the endpoints. The endpoint expansions (10) and (11) give
Hence , completing the proof that is an eigenfunction of the spectral problem (15) with energy for every $n\ge 1.
To locate this energy level in the spectrum, let us count the nodes of . Since on , the quotient has exactly zeros. Therefore, Rolle’s theorem gives at least distinct interior zeros of . On the other hand, the spectral problem (15) has exactly negative energy levels, so the Sturm oscillation theorem allows at most interior zeros for an eigenfunction of negative energy. Thus has exactly nodes, and is the highest negative energy level. In the notation (16), this reads
The corresponding similarity eigenfunction with , expressed in the original coordinate , is
An underlying differential identity
It is instructive to recast the preceding calculation without imposing the profile equation. Writing
we obtain, for arbitrary sufficiently smooth functions and ,
With and , the last two terms vanish by (20), yielding the identity
which is valid for any sufficiently smooth function . In particular, for every excited profile , the identity shows that satisfies the eigenvalue equation with , recovering the exact mode constructed above.
Comparison with reflected gauge modes in and .
In dimension , the transformed spectral equation depends on through
and is therefore invariant under . Consequently, the gauge mode with has the formal reflected partner
For smooth profiles in and , the behavior makes the apparent singularity removable. The reflection therefore yields admissible exact modes with and , respectively. Clearly, these modes can also be readily recovered from the first-order ansatz (18), which in these cases reduces to the derivative term alone (). However, for , the case considered here, the reflection fixes the gauge eigenvalue and therefore produces no new mode.
References
- [1]P. Bizón, Formation of singularities in Yang–Mills equations, Acta Phys. Pol. B 33, 1893–1922 (2002).
- [2]P. Bizón, Z. Tabor, On blowup of Yang–Mills fields, Phys. Rev. D 64, 121701(R) (2001).DOI
- [3]R. Donninger, Stable self-similar blowup in energy supercritical Yang–Mills theory, Math. Z. 278, 1005–1032 (2014).
- [4]O. Costin, R. Donninger, I. Glogić, M. Huang, On the stability of self-similar solutions to nonlinear wave equations, Commun. Math. Phys. 343, 299–310 (2016).arxiv.org/abs/1502.06280
- [5]P. Biernat, P. Bizón, M. Maliborski, Threshold for blowup for equivariant wave maps in higher dimensions, Nonlinearity 30, 1513–1522 (2017).DOI