The Dimension of the Two-Adic Hecke Algebra at Odd Level
Abstract
For every odd positive integer N, every irreducible component of the full two-adic Hecke algebra of level has Krull dimension four. This proves the p = 2 case of Emerton's dimension conjecture, including all residual components.
Introduction
The congruences between classical modular forms of different weights assemble their Hecke eigenvalues into a single -adic algebra. Its spectrum is larger than an individual family of eigenforms: many such families can pass through the same classical point. The dimension of this spectrum measures how much variation is present when no slope or residual irreducibility condition is imposed.
Fix an odd positive integer . For , let be the complex vector space of modular forms of weight and level , including Eisenstein series. For every prime , write for the usual Hecke operator and let act on as , where is the diamond operator. Let
be the -algebra generated by and for . Set
with transition maps given by restriction. The topology on is the inverse-limit topology, with the -adic topology on each . All dimensions below are Krull dimensions.
Theorem 1.1. For every odd positive integer , every irreducible component of has dimension exactly 4.
This is the case of Emerton’s Conjecture 2.9 [8]. The algebra in (1) retains all weights, all Eisenstein systems, and all residual systems of eigenvalues. In particular, the theorem does not require a residual Galois representation to be irreducible, nonscalar, or distinguished at 2.
History and the main input
Hida’s ordinary families [10] and the eigencurve of Coleman and Mazur [5] give fundamental constructions of -adic families of modular eigenforms. Gouvêa and Mazur’s infinite fern [9] explains how families intersect and produce higher-dimensional Zariski closures. Emerton’s account [8] formulates the dimension question for the full prime-to- Hecke algebra, without restricting to one residual deformation problem. His Corollary 2.28 gives the lower bound needed here: every irreducible component has dimension at least 4.
The complementary upper bound is a deformation-theoretic question. Mazur’s deformation theory [14] relates infinitesimal deformations of a Galois representation to its adjoint cohomology. For automorphic representations, the finite local conditions of Bloch and Kato [2] isolate a Selmer group within this cohomology. Under suitable hypotheses, Kisin [13] proved geometric adjoint Selmer vanishing and applied it to local deformation and eigencurve geometry. Allen [1] established adjoint Selmer vanishing under residual hypotheses and related local genericity to unobstructed deformations. Newton and Thorne [16] subsequently proved the vanishing theorem used here without the residual restrictions that would obstruct its application to all components at 2.
We use their Theorem 5.4 for classical cuspidal forms over . The theorem includes and also includes a CM form provided its CM field is not contained in the cyclotomic 2-power extension. Odd level guarantees this last condition. The result concerns the full adjoint representation, of dimension four, which is the one required when the determinant is allowed to vary.
Method and organization
The proof works at characteristic-zero points, even on components whose residual systems are reducible or scalar. There are three steps. First, the integral algebra is a finite product of complete Noetherian local rings, and its classical points are Zariski dense. At 2 we justify Noetherianity using Chenevier’s determinant laws [4], avoiding division by 2 in the integral pseudorepresentation. Second, the Eisenstein locus has dimension at most 2. Together with Emerton’s lower bound, this supplies a classical cuspidal point of weight at least 3 on every component. Third, the tangent space at such a point has dimension at most 3: the Newton–Thorne theorem annihilates the global finite Selmer group, and the only nonzero local quotient has dimension 3 at 2. A dimension formula then adds the one-dimensional arithmetic quotient.
Two passages in this argument are useful beyond the immediate application. Section 3 constructs the Eisenstein interpolation maps directly from the inverse-limit Hecke algebra by a compact graph argument. Section 4 gives a characteristic-zero tangent bound for a compact Noetherian algebra carrying a two-dimensional determinant. In particular, it proves the continuity of the derivations that occur in its algebraic tangent space. Neither passage assumes residual irreducibility.
We supply these arguments in detail. The deep external inputs are the classical attachment and local compatibility of Galois representations, Emerton’s lower bound, Chenevier’s determinant theorems, and Newton–Thorne’s Selmer vanishing. Their relevant forms and hypotheses are stated where they are used.
The integral algebra and its Galois determinant
Our first goal is to put the inverse limit eq:1 in the category of Noetherian rings while retaining all of its classical systems. Write for the set of finite primes dividing , and let be the Galois group of the maximal extension of unramified at finite primes outside . Ramification at infinity is allowed. All Galois cohomology will be continuous cohomology.
Finite stages and classical systems
We use the classical rationality, integrality, and simultaneous semisimplicity of the prime-to-level Hecke action; a convenient statement including weight one and Eisenstein forms is [8], Proposition 1.12 and Remark 1.13. For cusp forms, old copies have the same good-prime eigenvalues as their associated newforms. On the Eisenstein subspace the eigenvalues are sums and products of Dirichlet character values and powers of primes.
Consequently, for every nonzero finite stage there is an embedding
where each is finite and the coordinate maps are classical eigenvalue systems, with all necessary -adic embeddings included. Indeed, before tensoring with the algebra embeds into a finite product of rings of integers of number fields. It is therefore finite and torsion-free over ; flatness of preserves the embedding. Thus is finite free over , and its image in (2) is closed. Zero initial stages, if present, can be discarded.
A classical point of means the kernel of a classical eigenvalue map obtained from some finite stage. The following consequences will be used repeatedly.
Lemma 2.1. The ring is compact, Hausdorff, and reduced. Its classical points are Zariski dense, and the operators , , , topologically generate it over .
Proof. The restriction maps between finite-stage algebras are surjective: the generators at the smaller stage are restrictions of the same generators at the larger stage. Compactness and Hausdorffness follow from (1). Reducedness follows from the injections (2). Those injections also show that the intersection of all classical kernels in is zero, which is equivalent to the asserted density. Finally, the -algebra of polynomials in the indicated generators surjects onto each , and is therefore dense in the inverse limit.
For every classical system, the theorems of Deligne and Deligne–Serre [6, 7] give a continuous two-dimensional representation of over a finite extension of ; in the Eisenstein case one uses a direct sum of characters. Choose the Frobenius convention so that its characteristic polynomial at is
after specialization. A stable lattice ensures integral traces and determinants at every element of .
An integral determinant law
A two-dimensional determinant over a commutative ring is a unital multiplicative homogeneous polynomial law of degree two , compatible with extension of scalars; see [4], Section 1.
For a determinant , its trace and determinant on a group element are defined by . This notion works over rings in which 2 is not invertible.
Lemma 2.2. There is a continuous two-dimensional determinant over whose trace and determinant satisfy
Proof. At a fixed finite stage, take the tuple of traces and determinants of its classical Galois representations. The tuple belongs to the image of (2) on Frobenius conjugacy classes, by (2.2). The union of these classes is dense in by Chebotarev. The tuples are continuous class functions, and the image of (2) is closed. Hence the tuples belong to at every . Uniqueness on the dense union of Frobenius classes makes these functions compatible as varies. They give continuous functions with values in .
For completeness, the determinant law itself can be constructed without recovering it by division by 2. On a finite formal sum , prescribe the quadratic polynomial
where any ordering of the finite support may be used. In every classical representation this is the determinant of ; the formula is symmetric since . All polynomial identities expressing normalization and multiplicativity hold coefficientwise in every classical specialization. Their coefficients therefore vanish in by Lemma 2.1. Formula (3) defines the required polynomial law over arbitrary -algebras, with trace and determinant . □
Noetherianity at two
Proposition 2.3. The ring is a finite product of complete Noetherian local rings with finite residue fields. Its given topology on each factor is the maximal-ideal-adic topology.
Proof. Jochnowitz’s finiteness theorem [11], in the form [8], says that the reductions of the classical systems at fixed prime-to-2 level form a finite set. Every maximal ideal of is detected by such a reduction: the product in (2) is finite integral over , so one can apply lying over. Each is a finite product of complete local rings with finite residue fields. A surjective transition map injects the set of maximal ideals of into that of . These increasing sets have bounded cardinality, so stabilize on a tail. The corresponding local-factor maps are surjective, and identify their residue fields. We obtain
where each is a profinite local ring with finite residue field . The canonical Witt coefficient maps into the finite-stage local rings are the unique unramified lifts of the residue-field identifications. Their uniqueness makes them compatible, and gives its -algebra structure. Project the determinant of Lemma 2.2 to this factor, and let be its reduction. Chenevier’s determinant deformation theorem [4] provides a complete Noetherian local universal ring with finite residue field, representing continuous deformations of . Here the relevant finiteness hypothesis is Mazur’s condition: every open subgroup has only finitely many continuous homomorphisms to . For this follows from number-field finiteness for quadratic extensions with ramification restricted to a fixed finite set; see also [4].
Apply the universal property to finite quotients and pass to the inverse limit. This gives a continuous map
Its image contains the projections of every and . The image is compact and therefore closed, so Lemma 2.1 makes the map surjective. Its kernel is closed; the quotient is a complete Noetherian local ring. The continuous bijection from this compact quotient to the Hausdorff ring is a homeomorphism. This proves the topology assertion as well.
The determinant argument supplies the justification for the pseudodeformation step in [8], whose original references included an odd-prime restriction. No division by 2 has been used in Proposition 2.3.
We now record the geometric input from the infinite fern.
Theorem 2.4 (Emerton). For the algebra in (1.1), every irreducible component of has dimension at least 4.
This is [8], with the definitions in Sections 2.1 and 2.5 of that paper and with . It concerns the Hecke algebra of all modular forms used here, rather than a universal deformation ring for an irreducible residual representation.
Finding cuspidal points on every component
The lower bound in Theorem 2.4 lets us exclude small classical loci. We show that Eisenstein systems cannot fill a component, even when all weights are allowed.
Proposition 3.1. The closure of the classical points of bounded weight has dimension at most 1. The closure of all Eisenstein points has dimension at most 2.
Proof. Systems of weights at most factor through , which is finite over . Their closure therefore lies in the one-dimensional closed subset defined by . In particular, we may discard weights one and two when considering the Eisenstein locus.
In weight , an Eisenstein system has eigenvalues
where are Dirichlet characters of conductors dividing . The standard Eisenstein description gives these formulas; oldforms do not change the good-prime system. There are finitely many possible pairs, including their 2-adic embeddings. Partition the systems by pair and by the parity of . A family with finitely many weights has already been dealt with, so fix an infinite family, indexed by a set of weights, and a finite extension containing the character values. Put .
Every odd prime has a unique expression
On the fixed parity class, is constant. In (3.1), replace by . The resulting series specialize correctly at
We next verify that this prescription extends from generators to the inverse-limit algebra. Give its maximal-ideal-adic topology. Let be the closure in of the -algebra generated by the paired Hecke generators and their prescribed series. The projection is surjective: its image is closed by compactness and contains a dense subalgebra. For every and , continuity gives
where is the corresponding classical system. If , then vanishes at all the distinct . The series is a restricted power series, since its coefficients tend to zero. Strassmann’s theorem therefore implies , and hence . Thus is also injective. It is a homeomorphism, and the second projection defines a continuous map
Let , a compact, hence closed, subring of . Choose a prime with
Such primes exist by the Chinese remainder theorem and Dirichlet’s theorem. For this prime , , and . It follows from the image of that . The series
converges in , and its partial sums belong to . Closedness gives and then . A finite -basis of consequently generates as a -module. This is a finite integral extension, so . All the points in this family factor through by (6); their closure has dimension at most 2. Taking the finite union over the families, and adding weights one and two, proves the claim.
Corollary 3.2. For every minimal prime of , there is a classical cuspidal map of weight at least 3 such that and belongs to no other irreducible component of .
Proof. Let be the closure of the Eisenstein points and of the points of weights one and two. By Proposition 3.1, , whereas by Theorem 2.4. Since is Noetherian, it has finitely many minimal primes. Removing and every component other than leaves an open subset of containing the point . This open subset is nonempty and lies in . Lemma 2.1 supplies a classical point in it, which has the asserted properties.
Fix a point furnished by Corollary 3.2. Its system comes from a cuspidal newform of weight and level dividing . Enlarging if necessary, let
be its absolutely irreducible Galois representation. Absolute irreducibility here is a characteristic-zero theorem for cuspidal newforms [17]; nothing is asserted about its reduction. The specializations are the trace and determinant of .
A tangent bound in characteristic zero
We prove the tangent estimate in a form that separates it from the particular Hecke algebra. For a representation , the notation means with the conjugation action, not its trace-zero subspace.
Proposition 4.1. Let be a compact Hausdorff Noetherian topological -algebra, with continuous structure map . Suppose a profinite group has a continuous two-dimensional determinant over , with trace and determinant , and that their values topologically generate over . Let be a continuous -algebra map, where is finite, and suppose its specialized determinant is that of an absolutely irreducible continuous representation . For ,
Proof. The first inequality is the usual dimension bound for a Noetherian local ring. We prove the second by relating derivations to first-order Galois deformations.
The algebraic tangent space consists of continuous derivations. The image is a -submodule of , so is finite over . Its fraction field is the residue field of and is finite over . Since , is a -algebra. Put . Separability of gives a coefficient field in , and every -derivation kills this field. It follows that
so the left side has -dimension . The coefficient field can also be obtained by lifting a primitive element of the finite separable extension across the square-zero ideal; its minimal polynomial has invertible derivative.
Let be such a derivation, restricted to . It is -linear and vanishes on . Noetherianity makes finite over , and the exact sequence
shows that is finite over . Every finitely generated ideal of is closed: it is the image of a continuous map , hence compact. The quotient topology on is its usual finite-module topology, since a continuous surjection from a finite free -module to it is a quotient map between compact Hausdorff spaces. Any -linear map from a finite -module to is continuous. In particular, is continuous.
First-order determinants lift to continuous representations. Write for the dual-number -algebra, with . The map specializes the determinant to a continuous determinant lifting that of . Passing to the canonical Cayley–Hamilton quotient of (the quotient imposing the characteristic-polynomial identities of this determinant), the absolutely irreducible lifting theorem for determinants [4] gives a representation
with this determinant, whose reduction can be identified with . Its applicability is over the Henselian local ring : the residual representation at this point is the split absolutely irreducible representation over the characteristic-zero field .
Here continuity of follows from continuity of its trace. Choose such that the matrices form an -basis of ; absolute irreducibility guarantees such a choice. The lifts form a basis over . The trace pairing on this matrix algebra is nondegenerate, so the coordinates of in that basis are obtained by inverting a fixed Gram matrix and using the four functions
These functions are continuous. Hence is continuous.
Traces detect tangent vectors. Write . The homomorphism identity is exactly the cocycle identity for a continuous . Comparing traces gives
Coboundaries have zero image under the linear map
where is the -vector space of all functions . Thus the image of the linear map lies in the image of (11).
This map on derivations is injective. Indeed the degree-two trace identity gives
If for every , applying and working in the characteristic-zero field gives for every . The derivation then vanishes on the algebra of generators, and on its closure by continuity. Its restriction to determines it on by the quotient rule. The injection and (10) now prove (9). □
Apply Proposition 4.1 to , , , and the classical point chosen above. Propositions and lemmas in Section 2 verify its hypotheses. With , we obtain
The use of characteristic zero in the last proof does not impose any condition on the residual system of the component.
The adjoint cohomology bound
We now show that the right side of (12) is at most 3. For a finite place , write for the cohomology of its absolute Galois group. The Bloch–Kato finite subspace is
where is inertia and is Fontaine’s crystalline period ring. The global group consists of classes satisfying these conditions at every finite place. Conditions at infinity impose nothing here: the positive-degree cohomology of the real Galois group with -coefficients vanishes, since 2 is invertible in .
Global Selmer vanishing
The input from [16], Theorem 5.4, specialized to , is the following: if a regular algebraic cuspidal automorphic representation is non-CM, or is CM by a quadratic field not contained in , then the finite Selmer group of its full 2-adic adjoint representation vanishes. There is no hypothesis of residual irreducibility or an odd-prime restriction in this statement.
Lemma 5.1. For the representation (3.5), .
Proof. The form has weight at least 3, so its associated cuspidal automorphic representation is regular algebraic, in the usual cohomological normalization. Twists introduced by normalization do not change its adjoint representation.
Only the CM case requires a check. If has CM by , its automorphic representation has the quadratic self-twist . Since the level of divides the odd integer , its local representation at 2 is unramified. The local Langlands parameter of an unramified representation has trivial inertia; tensoring it with a ramified character cannot leave it unchanged. Thus is unramified at 2. The three quadratic subfields of are , , and , all ramified at 2. Therefore is not contained in that cyclotomic extension. Newton–Thorne’s theorem applies in both cases and gives the result. We may enlarge the finite coefficient field to apply the theorem; vanishing descends to under finite extension of scalars. □
The local quotients
Global Selmer vanishing will make restriction to the sum of the local quotients injective. To compute these quotients, we first use local Tate duality to eliminate the terms from the local Euler characteristic formulas.
Lemma 5.2. For every finite place , , where .
Proof. The trace pairing identifies with . The asserted group is therefore .
At , the representation is de Rham, hence Hodge–Tate, with two weights whose difference is . These are the classical comparison and filtration statements for modular Galois representations; see [12], Section 11.3, especially (11.3.3)–(11.3.4). One may pass to an auxiliary fine level when applying that cohomological description; the representation attached to is unchanged. A Tate twist shifts both weights by one, so the weight sets of and are disjoint. Subrepresentations and quotients of Hodge–Tate representations are Hodge–Tate, with their weights among those of the original representation. A nonzero image of a map would have weights in both sets, which is impossible.
Let . Local–global compatibility for cuspidal newforms [3], Theorem A identifies the Frobenius-semisimplified Weil–Deligne parameter of with that of the local automorphic representation, up to the conventional normalizing twist. The local automorphic representation is generic. The genericity criterion [1], Lemma 1.1.3 says that its Frobenius-semisimple Weil–Deligne parameter has . Here the Tate twist is normalized consistently with geometric Frobenius; normalizing character twists do not affect the criterion.
A nonzero Galois morphism would give a nonzero morphism of Weil–Deligne representations. It would remain a morphism after Frobenius semisimplification: an intertwiner of Frobenius also intertwines its semisimple part, and the inertia and monodromy conditions are unchanged. This contradicts the genericity criterion. □
Proposition 5.3. For the representation of a cuspidal newform of weight at least 3 and odd level dividing ,
Proof. Write for the -dimension of a cohomology group. Local Tate duality and the local Euler characteristic formulas are used in their characteristic-zero form; see [15], Chapter 7. Duality and Lemma 5.2 give at every finite place. For , the local Euler characteristic formula yields . The unramified cohomology is
The cokernel and kernel of an endomorphism of a finite-dimensional vector space have the same dimension. Consequently this group has dimension , and
At 2, the Euler characteristic formula instead gives
Write for the filtered de Rham module, where is Fontaine’s de Rham period field. The Bloch–Kato dimension formula [2], Corollary 3.8.4 gives
Indeed the filtration degrees of the adjoint consist of two zeros and two nonzero opposite integers, so exactly one degree contributes to the indicated quotient. We have proved
Finally consider restriction followed by passage to these local quotients:
Inflation identifies the source with a subspace of . Its classes are already unramified outside , so the kernel of (15) lies in , which vanishes by Lemma 5.1. Thus (15) is injective. Equations (13) and (14) give a target of dimension 3.
Dimension of the components
Proof of Theorem 1.1. Let be an arbitrary minimal prime of . By Corollary 3.2, choose a classical cuspidal point of weight at least 3 with . Equation (4.4) and Proposition 5.3 give
The quotient is a complete Noetherian local domain by Proposition 2.3, and is therefore catenary. The classical quotient is finite over and contains , so has dimension one. The dimension formula for a catenary local domain yields
Theorem 2.4 gives the opposite inequality. Since was arbitrary, all irreducible components have dimension 4.
References
- [1]Patrick B. Allen, Deformations of polarized automorphic Galois representations and adjoint Selmer groups, Duke Mathematical Journal 165 (2016), no. 13, 2407–2460.DOI
- [2]Spencer Bloch and Kazuya Kato, L-functions and Tamagawa numbers of motives, The Grothendieck Festschrift. Vol. I, Progress in Mathematics, vol. 86, Birkhäuser, Boston, 1990, pp. 333–400.
- [3]Henri Carayol, Sur les représentations l-adiques associées aux formes modulaires de Hilbert, Annales Scientifiques de l’École Normale Supérieure 19 (1986), no. 3, 409–468.DOI
- [4]Gaëtan Chenevier, The p-adic analytic space of pseudocharacters of a profinite group and pseudorepresentations over arbitrary rings, Automorphic Forms and Galois Representations. Vol. 1 (Fred Diamond, Payman L. Kassaei, and Minhyong Kim, eds.), London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series, vol. 414, Cambridge University Press, 2014, pp. 221–285.
- [5]Robert F. Coleman and Barry Mazur, The eigencurve, Galois Representations in Arithmetic Algebraic Geometry (Durham, 1996) (A. J. Scholl and R. L. Taylor, eds.), London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series, vol. 254, Cambridge University Press, 1998, pp. 1–113.DOI
- [6]Pierre Deligne, Formes modulaires et représentations ℓ-adiques, Séminaire Bourbaki, volume 1968/69, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 179, Springer, 1971, Exposé 355, pp. 139–172.
- [7]Pierre Deligne and Jean-Pierre Serre, Formes modulaires de poids 1, Annales Scientifiques de l’École Normale Supérieure 7 (1974), no. 4, 507–530.DOI
- [8]Matthew Emerton, p-adic families of modular forms [after Hida, Coleman, and Mazur], Séminaire Bourbaki, volume 2009/2010, exposés 1012–1026, Astérisque, no. 339, Société Mathématique de France, 2011, Exposé 1013, pp. 31–61.
- [9]Fernando Q. Gouvêa and Barry Mazur, On the density of modular representations, Computational Perspectives on Number Theory (Chicago, IL, 1995) (Duncan A. Buell and Jeremy T. Teitelbaum, eds.), AMS/IP Studies in Advanced Mathematics, vol. 7, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1998, pp. 127–142.DOI
- [10]Haruzo Hida, Galois representations into GL₂(ℤₚ[[X]]) attached to ordinary cusp forms, Inventiones Mathematicae 85 (1986), no. 3, 545–613.DOI
- [11]Naomi Jochnowitz, Congruences between systems of eigenvalues of modular forms, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society 270 (1982), no. 1, 269–285.
- [12]Kazuya Kato, p-adic Hodge theory and values of zeta functions of modular forms, Cohomologies p-adiques et applications arithmétiques (III), Astérisque, no. 295, Société Mathématique de France, 2004, pp. 117–290.
- [13]Mark Kisin, Geometric deformations of modular Galois representations, Inventiones Mathematicae 157 (2004), no. 2, 275–328.DOI
- [14]Barry Mazur, Deforming Galois representations, Galois Groups over Q (Berkeley, CA, 1987), Mathematical Sciences Research Institute Publications, vol. 16, Springer, New York, 1989, pp. 385–437.DOI
- [15]Jürgen Neukirch, Alexander Schmidt, and Kay Wingberg, Cohomology of number fields, second ed., Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften, vol. 323, Springer, Berlin, 2008.DOI
- [16]James Newton and Jack A. Thorne, Adjoint Selmer groups of automorphic Galois representations of unitary type, Journal of the European Mathematical Society 25 (2023), no. 5, 1919–1967.arxiv.org/abs/1912.11265
- [17]Kenneth A. Ribet, Galois representations attached to eigenforms with Nebentypus, Modular Functions of One Variable V, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 601, Springer, Berlin, 1977, pp. 17–52.DOI