alphaFeedback

WorksMathematics

The continuum limit of three-dimensional SU(2) lattice Yang–Mills theory on a torus V: Short-distance and weak-coupling asymptotics

AI contributions
Not recorded for this paper
View details
Ancillary data
1 code link
View

Abstract

We consider the Wilson lattice gauge measure for SU(2)\mathrm{SU}(2) on a periodic three-dimensional torus of fixed size, with bare coupling g2=g32ag^2=g_3^2a proportional to the lattice spacing aa, as dictated by the superrenormalizability of three-dimensional Yang–Mills theory. Observables are Wilson loops of the lattice configuration evolved by the Wilson flow, the lattice gradient flow of the Wilson action, at positive flow time. We prove that, at every fixed value of the coupling, the joint laws of finitely many flowed Wilson loops converge as the lattice spacing tends to zero along the sequences of lattice sides nMknM^k, for fixed odd M≥3M\ge3 and fixed positive nn divisible by four. For each such refinement class, the limits are realized by a unique probability measure on the space of gauge orbits of Yang–Mills heat-flow trajectories at positive times, a version of the state space introduced by Cao and Chatterjee. At each fixed positive time, the energies of the selected trajectories πk(U)\pi_k(U), with UU distributed under the lattice Wilson measures, are tight uniformly in the lattice spacing. The limiting measure is invariant under the lattice symmetries and the center symmetries. We also show that, at short distances, the rescaled deficits (1−W)/(g32ε)(1-W)/(g_3^2\varepsilon) of the normalized fundamental Wilson loops WW of loops x+εℓx+\varepsilon\ell, flowed for time σε2\sigma\varepsilon^2 with fixed σ>0\sigma>0, converge to explicit quadratic functions of the heat-smoothed Gaussian free field. As the coupling tends to zero, the measure concentrates on flat connections, with Gaussian fluctuations of explicit covariance near regular commuting holonomies and fluctuations governed by the constant-mode quartic form near the central holonomies. The proof is a multiscale renormalization group analysis in the tradition of Bałaban, carried out on a small-field event whose complement we show to have small probability, uniformly in the lattice spacing, using reflection positivity and chessboard estimates. It is combined with stochastic estimates for the lattice heat flow and a deterministic analysis of the Wilson flow for rough initial data.

Detail from Abraham Ortelius's Theatrum orbis terrarum

Figure 1.

WARNING!

We have extensively audited this manuscript using large language models, including adversarial reviews by multiple models. However, the proof is too complex for Lean formalization at the present time, and it has not yet undergone verification by a human expert.

Image: detail from Abraham Ortelius, Theatrum orbis terrarum (1570). Library of Congress, Geography and Map Division. https://www.loc.gov/resource/g3200m.gct00126/?sp=106

Authors’ Note

With the exception of this note, the entire document is machine-written. We have taken care to supervise this writing to ensure that the proofs meet a minimum standard of readability and that previous literature is appropriately cited.

The manuscript began as an attempt to pursue the program of Magnen, Rivasseau, and Sénéor [132] using large language models. Our hope was that understanding the problem on the torus might offer some insight into the general case. The construction that resulted from this starting point is three-dimensional and lattice-based and draws extensively on Bałaban’s renormalization group methods.

As we were verifying these results, we learned that Alpöge and Sussman announced that they appear to have a YM4 existence argument, following Bałaban’s program (https://github.com/ethanwsussman/Yang--Mills-LLM-experiment). We are thrilled and look forward to learning more about these exciting developments. We hope that this manuscript nonetheless contributes to understanding constructive approaches to three-dimensional Yang–Mills theory. The first version of these results was posted to the first author’s GitHub on October 17, 2026 (https://github.com/pmaronow/3d-ym-torus). Prior to posting the first version of this work, we did not inspect the ongoing work of Alpöge and Sussman. Further, to the best of our knowledge, the LLMs we used did not access their work during the mathematical development and drafting of this manuscript. This version contains additional clarifications relative to the first version; it has also been partitioned into five volumes.

We welcome suggestions concerning mathematical corrections, omitted citations, and attribution of ideas.

P. L. was partially supported by NSF grant DMS-2450004.

Gaussian short-distance limits

Reconstruction estimates and divergence-free currents

This section and § 2.2 prove the short-distance theorem, Theorem 2.8. We study the heat-smoothed circulations defined in Definition 31.1: circulations, around small lattice loops of size ε\varepsilon, of the linear heat evolution of the reconstructed fine field, divided by g32ε\sqrt{g_3^2\varepsilon}. They are linear in the link logarithms of one fixed gauge representative; flowed Wilson loops are compared with them in Lemma 32.11.

The main result of this section is an exact decomposition of the heat-smoothed circulation IK,sI^{K,s} under the conditioned Wilson measure, proved in Lemma 31.8:

IK,s=Ts+∑j=1K−sΓj(θ^j−1)(wj−w‾j)+NK,s.I^{K,s}=T_s+\sum_{j=1}^{K-s}\Gamma_j(\widehat{\theta}_{j-1})(w_j-\overline{w}_j)+N_{K,s}.

Here TsT_s is the contribution of the coarse field on the lattice of side nsn_s; the jj-th summand is linear in the centered normalized fluctuation variables of the jj-th RG step, so that the sum is a martingale; and NK,sN_{K,s} collects conditional means and nonlinear terms. For a≤ε≤ε0(s)a\leq\varepsilon\leq\varepsilon_0(s) and η=g32ε\eta=g_3^2\varepsilon, we show that

∣Ts∣+E∣NK,s∣≤Crg3Hsε+Cg3Dsε+Cη[1+log⁡(1/η)]2.\lvert T_s\rvert+\mathbb{E}\lvert N_{K,s}\rvert\leq\frac{Cr}{g_3H_s}\sqrt{\varepsilon}+Cg_3D_s\sqrt{\varepsilon}+C\sqrt{\eta}\left[1+\log(1/\eta)\right]^2.

uniformly in the number KK of RG steps, where Hs=L/nsH_s=L/n_s is the coarse mesh and DsD_s is bounded uniformly in ss. Theorem 31.6 identifies the covariance of the martingale increments at the zero field:

∑j=1K−sΓj(0)Γj(0)T=Ca,ε,L⊗I3−Cs,a,εret.\sum_{j=1}^{K-s}\Gamma_j(0)\Gamma_j(0)^{\mathsf{T}}=C^{a,\varepsilon,L}\otimes I_3-C^{\mathrm{ret}}_{s,a,\varepsilon}.

In the linearized Gaussian theory, Ca,ε,L⊗I3C^{a,\varepsilon,L}\otimes I_3 is the covariance of the circulation of the lattice Maxwell Gaussian field, and Cs,a,εretC^{\mathrm{ret}}_{s,a,\varepsilon} is the covariance of its conditional expectation given the linearized coarse field. As a→0a\to0 and then ε→0\varepsilon\to0, with ss fixed, the right side converges to Σ⊗I3\Sigma\otimes I_3, where Σ\Sigma is the covariance in (2.6). § 2.2 uses these facts to show that the martingale is asymptotically Gaussian.

The normalization by g32ε\sqrt{g_3^2\varepsilon} comes from the Gaussian Maxwell field. If AA has covariance g32(−Δ)−1g_3^2(-\Delta)^{-1} in three dimensions, then eσε2ΔAe^{\sigma\varepsilon^2\Delta}A has typical size g3ε−1/2g_3\varepsilon^{-1/2}, and its circulation around a loop of length of order ε\varepsilon has typical size g3ε=ηg_3\sqrt{\varepsilon}=\sqrt{\eta}.

Two ideas enter the proof of the decomposition. The first concerns the zero-fluctuation reconstruction, in which every fluctuation variable is set to zero. Let L^i\widehat{L}_i be the linearization at the zero field of the ii-th zero-fluctuation reconstruction map; it takes link logarithms on the lattice of mesh ai−1a_{i-1} to link logarithms on the lattice of mesh aia_i. Each L^i\widehat{L}_i is a constrained minimization of the Maxwell quadratic form. By Theorem 31.3, a product of them agrees, up to a periodic gradient, with a single constrained minimization over all the averaging steps at once:

a−1L^k⋯L^j+1v=aj−1Ejav+dafj(v).a^{-1}\widehat{L}_k\cdots\widehat{L}_{j+1}v=a_j^{-1}E_j^a v+d_a f_j(v).

The circulation around a closed lattice loop annihilates the gradient exactly, and EjaE_j^a obeys bounds that do not depend on k−jk-j. The nonlinear Taylor remainders R^i\widehat{R}_i of the reconstruction maps are inserted at their own scale and then propagated to the fine lattice by the linearizations:

mesh aj→P^i−1∘⋯∘P^j+1mesh ai−1→R^imesh ai→L^k⋯L^i+1mesh a.\text{mesh }a_j \xrightarrow{\widehat{P}_{i-1}\circ\cdots\circ\widehat{P}_{j+1}} \text{mesh }a_{i-1} \xrightarrow{\widehat{R}_i} \text{mesh }a_i \xrightarrow{\widehat{L}_k\cdots\widehat{L}_{i+1}} \text{mesh }a.

Converting link logarithms at mesh aia_i into a potential at the scale aja_j introduces the factor aj/ai=Bi−ja_j/a_i=B^{i-j}. Since R^i\widehat{R}_i vanishes to second order, every monomial contains at least two inputs, each carrying a contraction factor α∗\alpha_* for every preceding step. For i−1−ji-1-j preceding steps, the physical rescaling is therefore controlled by

ajaiα∗2(i−1−j)+1=C∗(Bα∗2)i−1−j,Bα∗2≤14.\frac{a_j}{a_i}\alpha_*^{2(i-1-j)+1}=C_*(B\alpha_*^2)^{i-1-j},\qquad B\alpha_*^2\leq\frac14.

The propagated remainders are therefore summable. The result is an analytic field E^ja\widehat{E}_j^a on the fine lattice with the same circulations as the reconstruction, whose coefficients are bounded uniformly in the number of steps; we need no such bound for the composed gauge representative itself.

The second idea concerns conditional means. The conditional law of the fluctuation variables is interacting. Using its density, the local covariance estimates of Section 13, and global color-rotation symmetry, we show that the conditional means of the nonlinear terms are of order tj2t_j^2 times the size of the coarse field. Their conditional variances are bounded independently of the number of fluctuation variables.

We keep four kinds of variables apart. The link logarithms θ^j\widehat{\theta}_j on the lattice of mesh aja_j are dimensionless; the potentials θ^j/aj\widehat{\theta}_j/a_j are in physical units; the normalized fluctuation variables wjw_j are distributed according to the conditional fluctuation kernel kjk_j of Theorem 31.5, which is supported on a product of balls; and independent standard Gaussian coordinates occur only in the linearized calculation of Theorem 31.6. All circulations are computed for the same gauge representative and with the componentwise heat semigroup.

The inputs come from Sections 4, 8, 10 to 13, 15, 16, and 23. § 2.1.1 fixes notation. § 2.1.2 defines the circulations and computes their covariance under the lattice Maxwell Gaussian field. § 2.1.3 compares linearized reconstructions and controls the nonlinear remainders. § 2.1.4 estimates the coefficients and the conditional means. § 2.1.5 proves the covariance identity, § 2.1.6 proves the decomposition and sums over scales, and § 2.1.7 records that all estimates hold at every fixed positive coupling. All results are used in § 2.2.

Setting and conventions

Fix L>0L > 0, an odd integer M≥3M \ge3, and an upper bound Γ>0\Gamma> 0 on the dimensionless coupling. Let JJ, B=MJB = M^J, the parameter tuple Θ\Theta, the reconstruction maps, and the minimal coarse side nΓn_{\Gamma} be as in Theorem 23.5; they are chosen before the coupling. Fix 0<γ≤Γ0 < \gamma\le\Gamma and set g32=γ/Lg_3^2 = \gamma/L. Fix n∗∈4Nn_* \in4\mathbb{N} and the sequence of lattice sides NK=n∗BKN_K = n_*B^K. For a coarse index s≥0s \ge0 with ns≥nΓn_s \ge n_{\Gamma} and for K≥sK \ge s, set

ns=n∗Bs,Hs=L/ns,k=K−s,n_s = n_*B^s,\qquad H_s = L/n_s,\qquad k = K-s,
aj=HsB−j(0≤j≤k),a=ak=L/NK,a_j = H_sB^{-j}\quad(0 \le j \le k),\qquad a = a_k = L/N_K,
dj=J(k−j),gj=g3aj,λB=M(J−1)/2,tj=λBgj,pj=AWlog⁡(1/tj).d_j = J(k-j),\qquad g_j = g_3\sqrt{a_j},\qquad\lambda_B = M^{(J-1)/2},\qquad t_j = \lambda_B g_j,\qquad p_j = A_{\mathrm{W}}\log(1/t_j).

References

  1. [31]R. Bott.

Paper details

vlnc:W_frh9tgjn
v1 · latestHistory (1)

published · Fresh — added to the Hub within the last 30 days

added ·

Usage

views · 0

downloads · 0

A view counts once per browser per day, a download each time the PDF is requested.

CC BY 4.0

Original source

  • Mathematics

Not recorded for this paper · View statement →

Looking for related papers…
Contents