alphaFeedback

WorksMathematics

Weak solutions to granular medium equations via stochastic particle approximations

AI contributions
Not recorded for this paper
View details

Abstract

We establish weak existence for McKean–Vlasov stochastic differential equations associated with granular medium equations with porous medium diffusion, for m>1 in arbitrary dimension. The result covers a class of nonconvex potentials with locally Lipschitz gradients of polynomial growth. Our particle approximation generates nonlinear diffusion through density-dependent noise and allows initial densities with finite Boltzmann entropy but infinite internal energy.

Introduction

The granular medium equation with porous medium diffusion has been studied for many years. However, a detailed proof of existence of weak solutions to the associated McKean–Vlasov stochastic differential equation does not appear to be readily available in the literature. The aim of this work is to fill this gap. Specifically, we establish the existence of weak solutions to a stochastic differential equation (SDE) whose time-marginal densities solve the following partial differential equation (PDE):

(PDE)

{∂tu=div⁡(u∇V)+div⁡(u(∇W∗u))+Δumin Rd×(0,T),u(⋅,0)=u0in Rd.\begin{cases} \partial_t u = \operatorname{div}(u\nabla V) + \operatorname{div}\bigl(u(\nabla W * u)\bigr) + \Delta u^m & \text{in } \mathbb{R}^d \times(0,T), \\ u(\cdot,0) = u_0 & \text{in } \mathbb{R}^d. \end{cases}

Here, m>1m > 1, VV and WW are the confinement and interaction potentials, respectively, and ∗* denotes convolution in the spatial variable. For each t∈[0,T)t \in[0,T), the function ut=u(t,⋅)u_t = u(t,\cdot) is a probability density on Rd\mathbb{R}^d.

More precisely, we construct a process (Yt)t∈[0,T)(Y_t)_{t\in[0,T)} that solves, in the weak sense, the McKean–Vlasov SDE

(SDE)

{dYt=−(∇V(Yt)+(∇W∗ut)(Yt)) dt+2 ut(Yt)m−12 dBt,t∈(0,T),Law⁡(Yt)(dx)=ut(x) dx,Y0∼u0(x) dx.\begin{cases} dY_t = -\bigl(\nabla V(Y_t) + (\nabla W * u_t)(Y_t)\bigr)\,dt + \sqrt{2}\,u_t(Y_t)^{\frac{m-1}{2}}\,dB_t, & t \in(0,T), \\ \operatorname{Law}(Y_t)(dx) = u_t(x)\,dx, \\ Y_0 \sim u_0(x)\,dx. \end{cases}

where (Bt)t∈[0,T)(B_t)_{t\in[0,T)} is a standard dd-dimensional Brownian motion.

In the one-dimensional case, equation PDE was introduced to model granular media in [3, 4]. Consider many infinitesimal particles colliding inelastically, then u(t,x)u(t,x) represents a density of the velocity of a representative particle (among infinitely many). The potential VV represents the friction and WW the inelastic collisions between particles with different velocities. In a different context, equations of this type were also considered in the recent survey [20] where it is used to describe such phenomena as aggregation, diffusion, and self-propulsion mechanisms among particles.

Several works study the long-time behaviour of solutions to this equation, including the existence of stationary measures and rates of convergence to equilibrium [11, 12, 26], or develop numerical schemes for its approximation [5, 27]. The question of existence, however, is not always treated in full detail in these works. In particular, [11] provides a detailed existence proof on bounded domains and outlines the argument for Rd\mathbb{R}^d. Under stronger assumptions on VV and WW, existence in the convex regime can also be established using gradient flow theory [2, 18], whereas our approach applies to a broader class of potentials than those covered by these results.

The problem of existence for linear diffusion (m=1m=1) was rigorously solved in [13] using a probabilistic technique called propagation of chaos that has been known since [23, 28, 32] and surveyed in [14, 15]. The core of this approach is to consider a system of NN particles Xt1,N,…,XtN,NX_t^{1,N},\ldots,X_t^{N,N} that are governed by NN linear SDEs and consider their empirical measure. If it converges to a deterministic limit as N→∞N \to\infty, we call it propagation of chaos. The name comes from the observation that, under natural assumptions, this property is equivalent to the asymptotic independence of the particles. More precisely, if we fix k∈Nk \in\mathbb{N}, then Law⁡(Xt1,N,…,Xtk,N)→N→∞ft⊗⋯⊗ft\operatorname{Law}(X_t^{1,N},\ldots,X_t^{k,N}) \xrightarrow[N\to\infty]{} f_t \otimes\cdots\otimes f_t in the weak sense, where ftf_t is the limit of the empirical measures.

In [13], the authors considered the following system of SDEs for i=1,…,Ni=1,\ldots,N and t>0t>0:

{dXti,N=−(∇V(Xti,N)+1N∑j=1N∇W(Xti,N−Xtj,N))dt+2 dBti,X0i∼μ0,(1)\begin{cases} \mathrm{d}X_t^{i,N}=-\left(\nabla V(X_t^{i,N})+\frac{1}{N}\sum_{j=1}^{N}\nabla W(X_t^{i,N}-X_t^{j,N})\right)\mathrm{d}t+\sqrt{2}\,\mathrm{d}B_t^i,\\ X_0^{i}\sim\mu_0, \tag*{(1)} \end{cases}

where Bt1,…,BtNB_t^1,\ldots,B_t^N are independent dd-dimensional standard Brownian motions. They showed that this problem is well-posed, the sequence of distributions of their empirical measures, i.e,

Law⁡(μ⋅N):=Law⁡(1N∑k=1NδX⋅k,N)∈P(P(C([0,T],Rd))),\operatorname{Law}(\mu_{\cdot}^{N}):=\operatorname{Law}\left(\frac{1}{N}\sum_{k=1}^{N}\delta_{X_{\cdot}^{k,N}}\right)\in\mathcal{P}\left(\mathcal{P}\left(C([0,T],\mathbb{R}^{d})\right)\right),

is tight and the limit is δQ∈P(P(C([0,T],Rd)))\delta_Q\in\mathcal{P}\left(\mathcal{P}\left(C([0,T],\mathbb{R}^{d})\right)\right), where QQ is the law of a solution to SDE for m=1m=1. For t>0t>0, the time marginals of QQ have densities utu_t solving PDE. Moreover X⋅1,N→Y⋅X_{\cdot}^{1,N}\to Y_{\cdot} in law, where Y⋅Y_{\cdot} solves SDE for linear diffusion case, i.e. with m=1m=1.

Our goal is to adapt this approach to obtain an analogous result for m>1m>1. A key difficulty in constructing a particle approximation of this SDE is that the diffusion coefficient depends on pointwise values of the probability density. Since empirical measures are atomic, they cannot be used directly to evaluate this coefficient. We address this difficulty by regularizing the empirical measure and using the resulting density approximation to define the diffusion coefficients of the particle system.

When V=W=0V=W=0, equation (PDE) reduces to the classical porous medium equation

{∂tu=Δ(um)in Rd×(0,T),u(⋅,0)=u0in Rd.\begin{cases} \partial_t u=\Delta(u^m)&\text{in }\mathbb{R}^{d}\times(0,T),\\ u(\cdot,0)=u_0&\text{in }\mathbb{R}^{d}. \end{cases}

Stochastic particle approximations of this equation have been studied in several settings. In one dimension, Jourdain [21] established a propagation of chaos result for a formulation in which the solution represents a cumulative distribution function. This result was extended to broader classes of functions in [6]. Philipowski [30] constructed an interacting diffusion approximation for the quadratic porous medium equation, m=2m = 2, in arbitrary spatial dimension. Figalli and Philipowski [19] subsequently extended this approach to general exponents m>1m > 1, using an additional approximation of the nonlinearity when 1<m<21 < m < 2. Their construction represents nonlinear diffusion through a regularized interaction drift and includes auxiliary Brownian noise. In our construction, nonlinear diffusion is instead approximated through a diffusion coefficient depending on a regularized empirical density.

Alongside these stochastic approaches, deterministic particle approximations of the porous medium equation have also been studied. In [1, 10], convergence of such approximations to solutions of (PME) was established using a gradient flow approach. Related results in [8, 9] concern the convergence of solutions to non-local diffusion equations, whose diffusion operators involve an interaction kernel, to solutions of (PDE). These results cover the cases m≤1m \le1 and m=2m = 2, under the assumption that VV and WW are semiconvex and grow at most quadratically. In particular, the authors of [10] used the JKO scheme (see, e.g., [2]) to construct solutions to the following non-local equation:

∂tuε=mm−1div⁡(uε∇φε∗(φε∗uε)m−1).\partial_t u^\varepsilon= \frac{m}{m-1}\operatorname{div}\left(u^\varepsilon\nabla\varphi_\varepsilon* \left(\varphi_\varepsilon* u^\varepsilon\right)^{m-1}\right).

where φε(x)=1εdφ(xε)\varphi_\varepsilon(x) = \frac{1}{\varepsilon^d}\varphi\left(\frac{x}{\varepsilon}\right) is a standard mollifier, and showed the convergence of uεu^\varepsilon with ε→0\varepsilon\to0 to the solution of PME.

Most of the approximations discussed above can be viewed as variants of the following particle system, which is deterministic for δ=0\delta= 0 and stochastic for δ>0\delta> 0:

dXti,N=−mm−1∫∇φε(y)(1N∑j=1Nφε(Xti,N−y−Xtj,N))m−1 dy dt+2δ dBti,X0i,N∼μ0.(2)\begin{aligned} \mathrm{d}X_t^{i,N} &= -\frac{m}{m-1}\int\nabla\varphi_\varepsilon(y)\left(\frac{1}{N}\sum_{j=1}^{N}\varphi_\varepsilon\left(X_t^{i,N}-y-X_t^{j,N}\right)\right)^{m-1}\,\mathrm{d}y\,\mathrm{d}t + \sqrt{2\delta}\,\mathrm{d}B_t^i, \\ X_0^{i,N} &\sim\mu_0. \tag*{(2)} \end{aligned}

In most of the particle approximations discussed above, nonlinear diffusion is represented through a regularized interaction drift, while any additional Brownian noise serves as an auxiliary regularization that vanishes in the limit. Exceptions include [21], which is restricted to one spatial dimension, and [22], which assumes a Lipschitz diffusion coefficient.

The key feature of our construction is that nonlinear diffusion is generated entirely by a Brownian term whose coefficient depends on a regularized empirical density. Our approach applies in arbitrary spatial dimension and does not require the limiting diffusion coefficient to be Lipschitz. Crucially, the density-dependent stochastic term remains present in the limiting SDE: letting δ\delta tend to zero removes only the auxiliary viscosity. More precisely, for i=1,…,Ni=1,\ldots,N, we consider the particle system

(PSDE)

dXti,N=−(∇V(Xti,N)+1N∑j=1N∇W(Xti,N−Xtj,N)) dt+2(∫Rd(1N∑j=1Nφϵ(Xti,N−y−Xtj,N))m−1φϵ(y) dy)+2δ dBti,X0i,N∼μ0.\begin{aligned} dX_t^{i,N}={}&-\left(\nabla V(X_t^{i,N})+\frac{1}{N}\sum_{j=1}^{N}\nabla W(X_t^{i,N}-X_t^{j,N})\right)\,dt\\ &+\sqrt{2\left(\int_{\mathbb{R}^{d}}\left(\frac{1}{N}\sum_{j=1}^{N}\varphi_{\epsilon}(X_t^{i,N}-y-X_t^{j,N})\right)^{m-1}\varphi_{\epsilon}(y)\,dy\right)+2\delta}\,dB_t^{i},\\ &X_0^{i,N}\sim\mu_0. \end{aligned}

For fixed ϵ\epsilon and δ\delta, we establish convergence of particle system, as N→∞N\to\infty. The limiting one-particle distributions are the martingale solution to the following non-local SDE:

References

  1. [1]A. Amassad and D. Zhou, A deterministic particle method for the porous media equation, arXiv:2501.18745 (2025).arxiv.org/abs/2501.18745
  2. [2]L. Ambrosio, N. Gigli and G. Savaré, Gradient Flows in Metric Spaces and in the Space of Probability Measures, 2nd ed., Lectures in Mathematics ETH Zürich, Birkhäuser, Basel, 2008.
  3. [3]D. Benedetto, E. Caglioti, J. A. Carrillo and M. Pulvirenti, A non-Maxwellian steady distribution for one-dimensional granular media, J. Statist. Phys. 91 (1998), nos. 5–6, 979–990.DOI
  4. [4]D. Benedetto, E. Caglioti and M. Pulvirenti, A kinetic equation for granular media, RAIRO Modél. Math. Anal. Numér. 31 (1997), no. 5, 615–641.
  5. [5]M. Benko, I. Chlebicka, J. Endal and B. Miasojedow, Convergence rates of particle approximation of forward-backward splitting algorithm for granular medium equations, Numer. Math. 158 (2026), 411–454.arxiv.org/abs/2405.18034
  6. [6]P. Blanchard, M. Röckner and F. Russo, Probabilistic representation for solutions of an irregular porous media type equation, Ann. Probab. 38 (2010), no. 5, 1870–1900.arxiv.org/abs/0805.2383
  7. [7]V. I. Bogachev, N. V. Krylov, M. Röckner and S. V. Shaposhnikov, Fokker–Planck–Kolmogorov Equations, Math. Surveys Monogr. 207, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2015.DOI
  8. [8]J. A. Carrillo, K. Craig and F. S. Patacchini, A blob method for diffusion, Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations 58 (2019), art. 53, 53 pp.arxiv.org/abs/1709.09195
  9. [9]J. A. Carrillo, A. Esposito, J. Skrzeczkowski and J. S.-H. Wu, Nonlocal particle approximation for linear and fast diffusion equations, arXiv:2408.02345 (2024).arxiv.org/abs/2408.02345
  10. [10]J. A. Carrillo, A. Esposito and J. S.-H. Wu, Nonlocal approximation of nonlinear diffusion equations, Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations 63 (2024), art. 100, 44 pp.arxiv.org/abs/2302.08248
  11. [11]J. A. Carrillo, R. J. McCann and C. Villani, Kinetic equilibration rates for granular media and related equations: entropy dissipation and mass transportation estimates, Rev. Mat. Iberoamericana 19 (2003), no. 3, 971–1018.DOI
  12. [12]J. A. Carrillo, R. J. McCann and C. Villani, Contractions in the 2-Wasserstein length space and thermalization of granular media, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 179 (2006), no. 2, 217–263.DOI
  13. [13]P. Cattiaux, A. Guillin and F. Malrieu, Probabilistic approach for granular media equations in the non-uniformly convex case, Probab. Theory Related Fields 140 (2008), nos. 1–2, 19–40.
  14. [14]L.-P. Chaintron and A. Diez, Propagation of chaos: a review of models, methods and applications. I. Models and methods, Kinet. Relat. Models 15 (2022), no. 6, 895–1015.DOI
  15. [15]L.-P. Chaintron and A. Diez, Propagation of chaos: a review of models, methods and applications. II. Applications, Kinet. Relat. Models 15 (2022), no. 6, 1017–1173.
  16. [16]E. Di Nezza, G. Palatucci and E. Valdinoci, Hitchhiker’s guide to the fractional Sobolev spaces, Bull. Sci. Math. 136 (2012), no. 5, 521–573.
  17. [17]L. C. Evans, Partial Differential Equations, 2nd ed., Grad. Stud. Math. 19, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2010.
  18. [18]A. Figalli and F. Glaudo, An Invitation to Optimal Transport, Wasserstein Distances, and Gradient Flows, EMS Textbooks in Mathematics, EMS Press, Berlin, 2021.
  19. [19]A. Figalli and R. Philipowski, Convergence to the viscous porous medium equation and propagation of chaos, ALEA Lat. Am. J. Probab. Math. Stat. 4 (2008), 185–203.
  20. [20]D. Gómez-Castro, Beginner’s guide to aggregation-diffusion equations, SeMA J. 81 (2024), 531–587.
  21. [21]B. Jourdain, Probabilistic approximation for a porous medium equation, Stochastic Process. Appl. 89 (2000), 91–99.
  22. [22]B. Jourdain and S. Méléard, Propagation of chaos and fluctuations for a moderate model with smooth initial data, Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré Probab. Statist. 34 (1998), no. 6, 727–766.
  23. [23]M. Kac, Foundations of kinetic theory, in: Proceedings of the Third Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, 1954–1955, Vol. III, Univ. California Press, Berkeley–Los Angeles, 1956, 171–197.DOI
  24. [25]R. Khasminskii, Stochastic Stability of Differential Equations, 2nd ed., Stochastic Modelling and Applied Probability 66, Springer, Berlin–Heidelberg, 2012.DOI
  25. [26]F. Malrieu, Logarithmic Sobolev inequalities for some nonlinear PDE’s, Stochastic Process. Appl. 95 (2001), no. 1, 109–132.
  26. [27]F. Malrieu, Convergence to equilibrium for granular media equations and their Euler schemes, Ann. Appl. Probab. 13 (2003), no. 2, 540–560.DOI
  27. [28]S. Méléard, Asymptotic behaviour of some interacting particle systems; McKean–Vlasov and Boltzmann models, in: Probabilistic Models for Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations (Montecatini Terme, 1995), Lecture Notes in Math. 1627, Springer, Berlin, 1996, 42–95.DOI
  28. [30]R. Philipowski, Interacting diffusions approximating the porous medium equation and propagation of chaos, Stochastic Process. Appl. 117 (2007), 526–538.DOI
  29. [31]J. Simon, Compact sets in the space Lᵖ(0, T; B), Ann. Mat. Pura Appl. (4) 146 (1986), 65–96.
  30. [32]A.-S. Sznitman, Topics in propagation of chaos, in: École d’Été de Probabilités de Saint-Flour XIX—1989, Lecture Notes in Math. 1464, Springer, Berlin, 1991, 165–251.DOI

Paper details

vlnc:W_sff8d278
v1 · latestHistory (1)

published · Fresh — added to the Hub within the last 30 days

added ·

Usage

views · 7

downloads · 0

A view counts once per browser per day, a download each time the PDF is requested.

CC BY 4.0

Original source

  • Mathematics

Not recorded for this paper · View statement →

Looking for related papers…
Contents